ruby-talk

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#407] New feature for Ruby? — Clemens.Hintze@...

Hi all,

27 messages 1999/07/01

[#408] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Julian R Fondren <julian@...> 1999/07/01

> - Range::new(1, 9, -2) -- ERROR!

[#411] Re: New feature for Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/01

Hi,

[#415] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/01

On Thu, 01 Jul 1999, Julian R Fondren wrote:

[#409] open without variables and implicit closing — Julian R Fondren <julian@...> 1999/07/01

If I use File.open without saving its return to a file, how can I or do I

[#410] Re: open without variables and implicit closing — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/01

Hi,

[#414] Re: open without variables and implicit closing — Julian R Fondren <julian@...> 1999/07/01

> (c)

[#413] Re: New feature for Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/01

Hi Clemens,

[#416] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/01

On Thu, 01 Jul 1999, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#417] regular expression lookbehinds — Julian R Fondren <julian@...> 1999/07/01

I'd like to suggest that the zero-width lookbehind and negative

[#418] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/01

Hi

[#426] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/02

Hi,

[#427] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/02

On Fri, 02 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#428] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/03

Hi,

[#429] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/03

On Sat, 03 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#430] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/05

Hi,

[#431] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/07

On Mon, 05 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#432] Re: New feature for Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/08

Hi,

[#433] pearl, perl, ruby, and ruby — Julian R Fondren <julian@...> 1999/07/08

Hi,

[#435] Re: pearl, perl, ruby, and ruby — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/08

Hi,

[#437] Re: pearl, perl, ruby, and ruby — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/08

On Thu, 08 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#434] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/08

On Thu, 08 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#436] redefinition and alias (Re: New feature for Ruby?) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/08

In message "[ruby-talk:00434] Re: New feature for Ruby?"

[#438] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/09

Hi

[#439] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/09

On Fri, 09 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#451] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/11

Hi

[#458] Re: New feature for Ruby? — kikutani@... 1999/07/11

On Sun, 11 Jul 1999 12:23:49 +0900 (JST),

[#440] Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hi,

21 messages 1999/07/09

[#441] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/09

Hi,

[#442] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/09

On Fri, 09 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#452] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/11

Hi,

[#456] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/11

On Sun, 11 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#460] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/12

Hi,

[#465] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/12

On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#466] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/12

In message "[ruby-talk:00465] Re: Now another totally different ;-)"

[#459] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — Akira Endo <akendo@...3.rim.or.jp> 1999/07/12

Hi, gotoken,

[#461] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/12

Hi,

[#462] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/12

Hello, there.

[#464] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/12

On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#467] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/12

Hi,

[#468] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/12

In message "[ruby-talk:00467] Re: Now another totally different ;-)"

[#474] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/13

In message "[ruby-talk:00471] Re: Now another totally different ;-)"

[#480] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/13

On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#493] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/14

In message "[ruby-talk:00480] Re: Now another totally different ;-)"

[#495] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/14

On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#475] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/13

In message "[ruby-talk:00473] Re: Now another totally different ;-)"

[#476] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/13

[#477] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/13

In message "[ruby-talk:00476] Re: Now another totally different ;-)"

[#443] — Michael Hohn <hohn@...>

Hello,

26 messages 1999/07/09

[#444] interactive ruby, debugger — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/09

Hi Michael,

[#445] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — Michael Hohn <hohn@...> 1999/07/09

[#446] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — kikutani@... 1999/07/09

On Sat, 10 Jul 1999 03:20:23 +0900 (JST),

[#447] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/09

In message "[ruby-talk:00446] Re: interactive ruby, debugger"

[#448] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 1999/07/10

Hi,

[#450] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/10

On Sat, 10 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#453] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 1999/07/11

Hi, ....Guten Morgen!

[#455] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 1999/07/11

Hi all,

[#457] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/11

On Sun, 11 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#479] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 1999/07/13

Hi,

[#483] coderefs — Julian R Fondren <julian@...> 1999/07/14

Does Ruby have the concept of an "anonymous" method, similar to Perl's

[#484] Re: coderefs — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/14

Hi,

[#486] Re: coderefs — Michael Hohn <hohn@...> 1999/07/14

[#489] Re: coderefs — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/14

On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#487] Re: coderefs — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/14

Hi,

[#449] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/10

Hi NaHi :-)

[#454] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 1999/07/11

Hi gotoken,

[#463] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/12

[#478] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 1999/07/13

Hi,

[#513] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 1999/07/23

Hello, is there any person who uses debug.rb?

[#517] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/23

Hi,

[#514] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/23

Hi,

[#515] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/23

Hi,

[#518] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 1999/07/23

Hi,

[#516] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — Michael Hohn <hohn@...> 1999/07/23

[#481] Modified debug.rb — Michael Hohn <hohn@...>

Hello again,

4 messages 1999/07/13

[#482] Re: Modified debug.rb — Michael Hohn <hohn@...> 1999/07/13

[#485] Re: Modified debug.rb — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/14

Hi,

[#488] Re: Modified debug.rb — Michael Hohn <hohn@...> 1999/07/14

[#490] Some questions concerning GC in Ruby extensions — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hi matz,

6 messages 1999/07/14

[#491] Ruby's GC (Re: Some questions concerning GC in Ruby extensions) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/14

Hi,

[#494] Re: Ruby's GC (Re: Some questions concerning GC in Ruby extensions) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/14

On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#499] Re: Ruby's GC (Re: Some questions concerning GC in Ruby extensions) — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 1999/07/15

Hi,

[#500] Re: Ruby's GC (Re: Some questions concerning GC in Ruby extensions) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/15

Hi,

[#492] Syntax tree (Re: Some questions concerning GC in Ruby extensions) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/14

Hi,

[#496] serialization of objects? — Michael Hohn <hohn@...>

Hello,

3 messages 1999/07/14

[#497] Re: serialization of objects? — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 1999/07/15

Hi,

[#498] Re: serialization of objects? — Michael Hohn <hohn@...> 1999/07/15

[#501] Ruby 1.3.5 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Ruby 1.3.5 is out, check out:

1 message 1999/07/15

[#502] One question about classes written in C. — Clemens.Hintze@...

3 messages 1999/07/16

[#504] Re: One question about classes written in C. — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/18

In message "[ruby-talk:00502] One question about classes written in C."

[#505] Re: One question about classes written in C. — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/19

Hi,

[#503] FromJapan: #3 — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)

Hi folks!

1 message 1999/07/17

[#506] Re: One question about classes written in C. — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

I think Cle made mistake; forwarded.

4 messages 1999/07/19

[#507] Re: One question about classes written in C. — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/20

On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#508] Re: One question about classes written in C. — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/20

Hi Cle,

[#511] Re: One question about classes written in C. — c.hintze@... 1999/07/20

On 20 Jul, GOTO Kentaro wrote:

[#509] Extension Tutorial? — Clemens.Hintze@...

3 messages 1999/07/20

[#510] Re: Extension Tutorial? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/20

Hi,

[#512] Re: Extension Tutorial? — c.hintze@... 1999/07/20

On 20 Jul, GOTO Kentaro wrote:

[#519] CGI.rb — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>

Hi...

7 messages 1999/07/24

[#520] Re: CGI.rb — OZAWA Sakuro <crouton@...> 1999/07/24

> I am using CGI.rb. It's very nice.

[#524] Re: CGI.rb — Wakou Aoyama <wakou@...> 1999/07/24

CGI.rb included rd(Ruby Document).

[#525] Re: CGI.rb — Wakou Aoyama <wakou@...> 1999/07/24

On Sun, Jul 25, 1999 at 08:16:33AM +0900,

[#521] Re: CGI.rb — Wakou Aoyama <wakou@...> 1999/07/24

Hello.

[#522] Re: CGI.rb — OZAWA Sakuro <crouton@...> 1999/07/24

> > I am using CGI.rb. It's very nice.

[#523] Re: CGI.rb — Wakou Aoyama <wakou@...> 1999/07/24

On Sun, Jul 25, 1999 at 06:47:56AM +0900,

[#526] Another way for this? And a new proposal! — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hi,

6 messages 1999/07/25

[#529] Re: Another way for this? And a new proposal! — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/25

Hi,

[#532] Re: Another way for this? And a new proposal! — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/25

Hi,

[#533] Re: Another way for this? And a new proposal! — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/26

Hi,

[#534] Re: Another way for this? And a new proposal! — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/26

On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#535] Objects in Ruby (Re: Re: Another way for this? And a new proposal!) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/26

Hi,

[#527] What is the difference? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hi,

2 messages 1999/07/25

[#531] Re: What is the difference? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/25

[#528] Single char conventions in Ruby's core? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hi,

2 messages 1999/07/25

[#530] Re: Single char conventions in Ruby's core? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/25

Hi,

[#536] Ruby 1.3.6 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Ruby 1.3.6 is out, check out:

1 message 1999/07/28

[#537] Ruby 1.3.6 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Ruby 1.3.6 is repacked, check out:

1 message 1999/07/28

[#538] OED 1999 Appeal — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)

Hi,

1 message 1999/07/29

[ruby-talk:00476] Re: Now another totally different ;-)

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Date: 1999-07-13 03:23:31 UTC

List: ruby-talk #476

In message "[ruby-talk:00475] Re: Now another totally different ;-)"
    on 99/07/13, GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp> writes:

|Maybe not all classes are fitting such convension. 
|But all mathematical classes seem to be approprieate to that.

Hmm, I agree that all methematical classes are appropriate.  My
concern is about classes which has conversion function of the same
name, i.e. Array and String.  Simply ignore them?

                                                matz.

Thread

In This Thread