[#407] New feature for Ruby? — Clemens.Hintze@...

Hi all,

27 messages 1999/07/01
[#413] Re: New feature for Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/01

Hi Clemens,

[#416] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/01

On Thu, 01 Jul 1999, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#418] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/01

Hi

[#426] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/02

Hi,

[#440] Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hi,

21 messages 1999/07/09
[#441] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/09

Hi,

[#442] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/09

On Fri, 09 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#443] — Michael Hohn <hohn@...>

Hello,

26 messages 1999/07/09
[#444] interactive ruby, debugger — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/09

Hi Michael,

[ruby-talk:00507] Re: One question about classes written in C.

From: Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Date: 1999-07-20 06:20:50 UTC
List: ruby-talk #507
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, you wrote:
>I think Cle made mistake; forwarded.

You was right! Sorry for my mistake.

Any opinions so far? :-)

\cle

>
>------- Start of forwarded message -------
>From: Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@gmx.net>
>To: matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
>Subject: Re: [ruby-talk:00502] One question about classes written in C.
>Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 08:19:44 +0200
>
>On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, you wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>In message "[ruby-talk:00502] One question about classes written in C."
>>    on 99/07/16, Clemens.Hintze@bln.sel.alcatel.de <Clemens.Hintze@bln.s=
>el.alcatel.de> writes:

[...]

In This Thread