[#407] New feature for Ruby? — Clemens.Hintze@...

Hi all,

27 messages 1999/07/01
[#413] Re: New feature for Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/01

Hi Clemens,

[#416] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/01

On Thu, 01 Jul 1999, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#418] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/01

Hi

[#426] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/02

Hi,

[#440] Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hi,

21 messages 1999/07/09
[#441] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/09

Hi,

[#442] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/09

On Fri, 09 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#443] — Michael Hohn <hohn@...>

Hello,

26 messages 1999/07/09
[#444] interactive ruby, debugger — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/09

Hi Michael,

[ruby-talk:00512] Re: Extension Tutorial?

From: c.hintze@...
Date: 1999-07-20 19:57:03 UTC
List: ruby-talk #512
On 20 Jul, GOTO Kentaro wrote:
>  Hi, 
>  
>  In message "[ruby-talk:00509] Extension Tutorial?"
>      on 99/07/20, Clemens.Hintze@bln.sel.alcatel.de <Clemens.Hintze@bln.sel.alcatel.de> writes:
>  

[...]

>  
>  Great! I could meet that earlier :-)
>  Though Matz's README is not bad, I love step-by-step tutorial too. 

Here we both feel the same :-)

[...]

>  
>  Maybe, texinfo is better. Some tools to convert into html are known. 

I have already begun to dig out my texinfo Manual. :-) I have not used
it for a long long time :-)))

>  
>  Could you write about tips on finding pre-defined function or
>  the customary naming rules?

Am I a mirror of your thoughts ;-) Both is intended to be introduced
into the tutorial already!

>  
>  -- gotoken

\cle

In This Thread

Prev Next