[#377882] remove array bracket — Kamarulnizam Rahim <niezam54@...>

Hi when i run my script, the output is as followed:

18 messages 2011/02/02

[#378046] Setter method for Hash value — Rolf Pedersen <rolfhsp@...>

Hi

20 messages 2011/02/03
[#378052] Re: Setter method for Hash value — Brian Candler <b.candler@...> 2011/02/03

Rolf Pedersen wrote in post #979431:

[#378056] Re: Setter method for Hash value — Rolf Pedersen <rolfhsp@...> 2011/02/03

Hi Brian (and others who have contributed with suggestions along the same

[#378144] C extension: How to check if a VALUE is still alive (not being GC'ed)? — Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@...>

Hi, I'm coding an async DNS resolver for EventMachine based on udns (a

13 messages 2011/02/05
[#378171] Re: C extension: How to check if a VALUE is still alive (not being GC'ed)? — Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...> 2011/02/06

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 4:02 PM, I=F1aki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

[#378179] Re: C extension: How to check if a VALUE is still alive (not being GC'ed)? — Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@...> 2011/02/06

2011/2/6 Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@medioh.com>:

[#378199] Choosing an office suite — Hilary Bailey <my77elephants@...>

I am trying to decide which office suite to choose from. The only

30 messages 2011/02/07
[#378229] Re: Choosing an office suite — Phillip Gawlowski <cmdjackryan@...> 2011/02/07

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Hilary Bailey <my77elephants@gmail.com> wrote:

[#378202] making hash key from arrays — Arihan Sinha <arihan_sinha@...>

Hi All,

11 messages 2011/02/07

[#378254] "permission denied" happening too often — Peter Bailey <pbailey@...>

Hello,

15 messages 2011/02/08
[#378256] Re: "permission denied" happening too often — Anurag Priyam <anurag08priyam@...> 2011/02/08

> I've got Ruby scripts that have been working fine for years now. But,

[#378257] Re: "permission denied" happening too often — Markus Schirp <mbj@...> 2011/02/08

You can also try to strace your script. In the logs you'll find the system

[#378259] Re: "permission denied" happening too often — Peter Bailey <pbailey@...> 2011/02/08

Markus Schirp wrote in post #980289:

[#378307] undefined class/module YAML::PrivateType - Error — "Priya D." <dharsininitt@...>

Hi,

11 messages 2011/02/09

[#378341] System calls with ` in parameters — "Gerad S." <geradstemke@...>

Hi All,

12 messages 2011/02/09

[#378618] Defining class methods — Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...>

It seems there are 3 ways of defining class methods (at least in common

12 messages 2011/02/16

[#378685] LiveAST: a pure Ruby 1.9.2 library obtaining live abstract syntax trees — "James M. Lawrence" <quixoticsycophant@...>

= LiveAST

13 messages 2011/02/18

[#378753] posix_mq : Problem installing on HPUX — Tadeusz Bochan <tad.bochan@...>

Hello,

13 messages 2011/02/20

[#378890] a, b = Array.new(2).map!{|x| data.dup} — Stefan Salewski <mail@...>

I think I can replace this code

19 messages 2011/02/23
[#378892] Re: a, b = Array.new(2).map!{|x| data.dup} — niklas | brueckenschlaeger <niklas@...> 2011/02/23

Are you sure you can't rework your code to *not* copy data 5x? I assume

[#378899] Re: a, b = Array.new(2).map!{|x| data.dup} — Stefan Salewski <mail@...> 2011/02/23

On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 07:00 +0900, niklas | brueckenschlaeger wrote:

[#378941] Automatic question generator libs in Ruby Language — Sniper Abandon <sathish.salem.1984@...>

is there any Automatic question generator libraries in Ruby Language ?

20 messages 2011/02/24
[#379058] Re: Automatic question generator libs in Ruby Language — Sniper Abandon <sathish.salem.1984@...> 2011/02/27

suppose if i have a paragraph (arround 250 words)

[#379172] Re: Automatic question generator libs in Ruby Language — Shadowfirebird <shadowfirebird@...> 2011/03/01

> i want to get all the possible question from that paragraph

[#379174] Re: Automatic question generator libs in Ruby Language — Peter Zotov <whitequark@...> 2011/03/01

On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 19:31:36 +0900, Shadowfirebird wrote:

[#379175] Re: Automatic question generator libs in Ruby Language — Adam Prescott <mentionuse@...> 2011/03/01

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Peter Zotov <whitequark@whitequark.org>wrote:

[#379177] Re: Automatic question generator libs in Ruby Language — Peter Zotov <whitequark@...> 2011/03/01

On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 20:02:13 +0900, Adam Prescott wrote:

[#379179] Re: Automatic question generator libs in Ruby Language — Adam Prescott <mentionuse@...> 2011/03/01

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Peter Zotov <whitequark@whitequark.org>wrote:

[#378949] why is $1 in a grep() equal to nil? — 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@...>

class DataSource

16 messages 2011/02/24
[#378953] Re: why is $1 in a grep() equal to nil? — Eric Christopherson <echristopherson@...> 2011/02/25

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:59 PM, 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> wrote:

[#378958] parsing rule for this code? — 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@...>

1)

11 messages 2011/02/25

[#379000] Symbol#to_proc helping out with #select to beat Scala-s solution — Jarmo Pertman <jarmo.p@...>

Hey!

9 messages 2011/02/25

[#379074] finding a tag in a binary file — rob stanton <tnotnats@...>

I have a binary file in which I'd like to find multiple strings of 10

12 messages 2011/02/27

New Version

From: Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...>
Date: 2011-02-14 22:08:38 UTC
List: ruby-talk #378540
Announcing ri_cal version 0.8.8
a new implementation of RFC2445 in Ruby

A new Ruby implementation of RFC2445 iCalendar.

The existing Ruby iCalendar libraries (e.g. icalendar, vpim) provide
for parsing and generating icalendar files,
but do not support important things like enumerating occurrences of
repeating events.

This is a clean-slate implementation of RFC2445.

A Google group for discussion of this library has been set up
http://groups.google.com/group/rical_gem


Changes:

=== v0.8.8 2011-02-13
   Regenerate gemspec for version 0.8.8
   Version bump to 0.8.8
   fix x property access
   change rakefile to use ad_agency
=== v0.8.7 2010-04-16
   Regenerated gemspec for version 0.8.7
   update history
   Version bump to 0.8.7
   fix tickets #29-supress x-rical-tzsource when not relevant
=== v0.8.6 2010-04-15
   Regenerated gemspec for version 0.8.6
   update history prior to release
   Version bump to 0.8.6
   fix tzinfo timezone export
   force change managment datetimes to zulu time
   added ZuluDateTime property for use by change management properties
   parked a spec
   Convert to jeweler
   Version bump to 0.8.5
   remove unneeeded Date#to_time and DateTime#to_time methods
   remove inf loop spec temporarily
   Working on a bug where a recurrence rule with simple by-parts
caused an infinite loop   See spec/ri_cal/inf_loop_spec

     Although the reported bug is fixed there is still work to do
because giving an event a dtstart
     not within the recurrence rule produces incorrect output.

     1) 'an event with unneeded by parts with a dtstart outside the
recurrence rule should enumerate 10 events first July 12, 1940, July
13, 1940, July 13, 1941 when count is 3' FAILED
     expected: ["1940-07-12", "1940-07-13", "1941-07-13"],
          got: ["1940-07-12", "1940-07-13", "1941-07-12"] (using ==)

      I'm going to push this to github, but not release a new gem
version until I can fix this latter bug.

   fixed infinite loop bug for reported case
   website and gemspec
   Fixed Ticket #26, failing with date values for event dtstart and dtend
   updated website
=== v0.8.4 2009-09-18
   fixed gemspec problem
=== v0.8.3 2009-09-18
   prepared to publish
   refactored occurrence incrementers
   checkpoint
   changed ri_cal.rb to autoload
   changed ri_cal.rb to autoload
=== v0.8.2 2009-09-05
   another attempt to trigger github to rebuild
   fixed gem version so github should now build
   Fixes http://rick_denatale.lighthouseapp.com/projects/30941/tickets/23
        initialization_methodsrb-syntax   Fixes
http://rick_denatale.lighthouseapp.com/projects/30941/tickets/24
  need-to-handle-empty-property-values
   fixed ticket #23
   adopted patch from ebigart
   Support properties with no value (e.g. 'LOCATION;LANGUAGE=en-US:'
gets generated using Outlook)
=== v0.8.1 2009-08-18
   Fixes http://rick_denatale.lighthouseapp.com/projects/30941/tickets/21
        exception-when-count-option-used-to-enumerate-non-recurring-event
=== v0.8.0 2009-08-11
   Minor Version Bump - There is a small potentially breaking change
see section on treatment of X-properties below   * Unknown Components

     Starting with version 0.8.0 RiCal will parse calendars and
components which contain nonstandard components.

     For example, there was a short-lived proposal to extend RFC2445
with a new VVENUE component which would hold structured information
about the location of an event.  This proposal was never accepted and
was withdrawn, but there is icalendar data in the wild which contains
VVENUE components.

     Prior to version 0.8.0, RiCal would raise an exception if unknown
component types were encountered.  Starting with version 0.8.0 RiCal
will 'parse' such components and create instances of NonStandard
component to represent them.  Since the actual format of unknown
components is not known by RiCal, the NonStandard component will
simply save the data lines between the BEGIN:xxx and END:xxx lines,
(where xxx is the non-standard component name, e.g. VVENUE).  If the
calendar is re-exported the original lines will be replayed.

     * Change to treatment of X-properties

     RFC2445 allows 'non-standard' or experimental properties which
property-names beginning with X.  RiCal always supported parsing
these.

     The standard properties are specified as to how many times they
can occur within a particular component.  For singly occurring
properties RiCal returns a single property object, while for
properties which can occur multiple times RiCal returns an array of
property objects.

     While implementing NonStandard properties, I realized that
X-properties were being assumed to be singly occurring. But this isn't
necessarily true.  So starting with 0.8.0 the X-properties are
represented by an array of property objects.

     THIS MAY BREAK SOME APPLICATIONS, but the adaptation should be easy.

   - No changes other than a version number bump.  github seems to
have failed to notice the commit of v0.7.6
        and didn't build the gem.  Hopefully it will notice this one.



-- 
Rick DeNatale

Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: http://github.com/rubyredrick
Twitter: @RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale

In This Thread

Prev Next