[#9854] BUG: ruby-yarv 1.9 undefined method `close' for nil:NilClass in ensure — ville.mattila@...
Hello,
[#9864] String#upto edge case - empty string causes infinite loop — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On 1/8/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
On 1/8/07, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
On 1/9/07, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
[#9869] a block argument within a block which argument has the same name leaks — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #7680, was opened at 2007-01-08 22:53
Hi,
On Jan 8, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi --
Hi,
Hi --
Hi,
Hi,
Evan Phoenix wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Jan 10, 2007, at 8:43 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
[#9897] Time Zone printing differently for 1.8.4 and 1.8.5. — "Jim Freeze" <jim@...>
> ruby -rparsedate -ve 'puts Time.mktime(* ParseDate.parsedate("Thu Nov 02
[#9908] rdoc for 1.8.5 not creating Module docs? — James Britt <james.britt@...>
When running rdoc over the current 1.8.5 source, the resulting HTML file
[#9926] Fix for File and File::Stat to deal with bogus stat.st_size member — <noreply@...>
Patches item #7760, was opened at 2007-01-11 14:26
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Berger, Daniel wrote:
[#9949] sandbox 0.4 (r115) with a new patch — _why <why@...>
Okay, here's the latest release of the freaky freaky sandbox.
[#9959] anonymous classes share single alloc function — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #7974, was opened at 2007-01-18 13:28
[#9960] Scoping and locating definitions — Jos Backus <jos@...>
Consider the following:
Jos Backus schrieb:
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 06:40:03PM +0900, Pit Capitain wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:18:19AM +0900, Jos Backus wrote:
On 1/20/07, Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com> wrote:
Jos Backus schrieb:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 04:39:52AM +0900, Pit Capitain wrote:
Jos Backus schrieb:
[#9969] Allowing Unicode in the grammar? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi Matz,
[#9996] new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal) — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
Hi,
It's late for me here, so I have just brief comments below...
Hi,
SASADA Koichi wrote:
Hi,
On Jan 23, 2007, at 7:41 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, James Edward Gray II wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
The more this discussion goes on, the more I worry that Joe Q Public
Hi,
[#10019] stable branch policy & schedule for 1.8.6 — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Core developers,
Akinori MUSHA wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Jan 23, 2007, at 22:13, Joel VanderWerf wrote:
At Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:13:52 +0900,
Hello,
Hi,
[#10066] class variables and inheritance — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #8156, was opened at 2007-01-25 15:05
[#10068] Re: Method Dispatch (was Adding methods to String, but only in my own Module?) — gwtmp01@...
[#10085] Collaborative Ruby Language Specification — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>
Hi Everyone,
On 1/28/07, John Lam (CLR) <jflam@microsoft.com> wrote:
Hi --
>> I'm not sure what there is to be non-neutral about :-)
Hi --
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
John Lam (CLR) wrote:
> I hope such a spec would be developed "in the open" from the beginning,
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 1/30/07, Eustaquio Rangel de Oliveira Jr. <eustaquiorangel@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 1/30/07, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:
> > I was checking some CLR opinions and - correct me please if I'm wrong - seems
[#10114] add usage of uri.userinfo to open-uri.rb — <noreply@...>
Patches item #8309, was opened at 2007-01-30 15:25
On 2007/01/31, at 06:07, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:19:34AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi matz,
Hi,
On Feb 2, 2007, at 7:40 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#10135] Another .document patch. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I have been looking at the tips for irb at:
Re: Scoping and locating definitions
Hi Terry, On 1/20/07, Terry Weissman <terry@liveops.com> wrote: > The point is, in Python, if file A chooses to import package B, it is > very unlikely to affect code operating in completely unrelated file > C. In Ruby, it's entirely possible that the import of B could have > broken something that C depended on. As you pointed out, this is a trade off between having a powerful language and having a safe one. Most languages that I know won't let me redefine the + operator for integers. I really like that Ruby lets me do it. (I haven't needed to redefine +, at least not yet.) I can imagine a reasonable language that has the features you'd like. I just wouldn't call it Ruby. I'm glad Matz chose to position Ruby much more towards the "powerful" end of the spectrum rather than the "safe" end. There are domains that can benefit from a lot of safety, and others that can benefit from a lot of power. If I were programming the control system for a nuclear reactor, Ruby probably wouldn't be my first choice. But that's one reason I don't do those kinds of projects. > If you are in a world where all the code is written by good, > competent programmers who've agreed on the ground rules, Ruby can > give them all a lot of power. But if you're not so sure about your > fellow programmers, or about code that you are loading off the net, > then Ruby's model offers much less protection than Python's. > > This kind of thing would make me much more scared to work on a big > project in Ruby than I would be in Python. I wouldn't want to program a large project in Ruby with programmers that I didn't trust. But having been on projects like this using "safer" languages, I also wouldn't want to program a large project in _any_ language with programmers that I didn't trust. There are just so many ways another programmer can make a project difficult, and any language can only protect you from a handful of them. (Hi Jos! How are you doing?) Wayne --- Wayne Vucenic No Bugs Software Ruby, C#, and Erlang Agile Contract Programming in Silicon Valley