[#9854] BUG: ruby-yarv 1.9 undefined method `close' for nil:NilClass in ensure — ville.mattila@...
Hello,
[#9864] String#upto edge case - empty string causes infinite loop — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On 1/8/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
On 1/8/07, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
On 1/9/07, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
[#9869] a block argument within a block which argument has the same name leaks — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #7680, was opened at 2007-01-08 22:53
Hi,
On Jan 8, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi --
Hi,
Hi --
Hi,
Hi,
Evan Phoenix wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Jan 10, 2007, at 8:43 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
[#9897] Time Zone printing differently for 1.8.4 and 1.8.5. — "Jim Freeze" <jim@...>
> ruby -rparsedate -ve 'puts Time.mktime(* ParseDate.parsedate("Thu Nov 02
[#9908] rdoc for 1.8.5 not creating Module docs? — James Britt <james.britt@...>
When running rdoc over the current 1.8.5 source, the resulting HTML file
[#9926] Fix for File and File::Stat to deal with bogus stat.st_size member — <noreply@...>
Patches item #7760, was opened at 2007-01-11 14:26
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Berger, Daniel wrote:
[#9949] sandbox 0.4 (r115) with a new patch — _why <why@...>
Okay, here's the latest release of the freaky freaky sandbox.
[#9959] anonymous classes share single alloc function — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #7974, was opened at 2007-01-18 13:28
[#9960] Scoping and locating definitions — Jos Backus <jos@...>
Consider the following:
Jos Backus schrieb:
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 06:40:03PM +0900, Pit Capitain wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:18:19AM +0900, Jos Backus wrote:
On 1/20/07, Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com> wrote:
Jos Backus schrieb:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 04:39:52AM +0900, Pit Capitain wrote:
Jos Backus schrieb:
[#9969] Allowing Unicode in the grammar? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi Matz,
[#9996] new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal) — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
Hi,
It's late for me here, so I have just brief comments below...
Hi,
SASADA Koichi wrote:
Hi,
On Jan 23, 2007, at 7:41 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, James Edward Gray II wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
The more this discussion goes on, the more I worry that Joe Q Public
Hi,
[#10019] stable branch policy & schedule for 1.8.6 — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Core developers,
Akinori MUSHA wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Jan 23, 2007, at 22:13, Joel VanderWerf wrote:
At Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:13:52 +0900,
Hello,
Hi,
[#10066] class variables and inheritance — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #8156, was opened at 2007-01-25 15:05
[#10068] Re: Method Dispatch (was Adding methods to String, but only in my own Module?) — gwtmp01@...
[#10085] Collaborative Ruby Language Specification — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>
Hi Everyone,
On 1/28/07, John Lam (CLR) <jflam@microsoft.com> wrote:
Hi --
>> I'm not sure what there is to be non-neutral about :-)
Hi --
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
John Lam (CLR) wrote:
> I hope such a spec would be developed "in the open" from the beginning,
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 1/30/07, Eustaquio Rangel de Oliveira Jr. <eustaquiorangel@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 1/30/07, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:
> > I was checking some CLR opinions and - correct me please if I'm wrong - seems
[#10114] add usage of uri.userinfo to open-uri.rb — <noreply@...>
Patches item #8309, was opened at 2007-01-30 15:25
On 2007/01/31, at 06:07, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:19:34AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi matz,
Hi,
On Feb 2, 2007, at 7:40 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#10135] Another .document patch. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I have been looking at the tips for irb at:
Re: String#upto edge case - empty string causes infinite loop
On 1/8/07, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Arnaud Bergeron [mailto:abergeron@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 12:49 PM
> > To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
> > Subject: Re: String#upto edge case - empty string causes infinite loop
>
> <snip>
>
> > Since "\377".succ yields "\001\000" I belive it would make
> > more sense having "".succ return "\000" and continue on from there.
>
> Hm, it does seem to be a tradition among other languages:
These examples are not exactly the same situation, as none of these
languages have the equivalent of succ for strings.
> # Perl
> my $str = "";
> print ++$str; # 1
Perl is the only language I'm not familiar with here, so I am not
really sure what happens here but I heard about automagic conversion
of string to numbers.
> /* C */
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> int main(){
> char* empty = "";
> printf("Value: %i\n", atoi(empty) + 1); /* 1 */
> return 0;
> }
Here you are explicitly converting the string to a number (and due to
stupidity, atoi interprets "" as being the number 0). After adding 1
it is no suprise that it prints 1.
> /* Java */
> public class EmptyTest{
> public static void main(String[] args){
> String empty = "";
> System.out.println(empty + 1); /* 1 */
> }
> }
Here you get string concatenation. You could have written "" + "1"
and it would have only been more explicit. The number 1 gets
converted to a string and if you concatenate that string with the
empty string you get "1".
The .succ function is a different beast than these examples because it
returns the next string in order.
> > However there might be a problem because letters are treated
> > differently. "z".succ yield "aa" and not "}" and the same is
> > true for "Z" so this might need more thought, but in my
> > opinion yielding the empty string once is the last expected behavior.
>
> As you suggest, I'm not sure what repurcussions changing the return
> value of "".succ might have. My approach at least has the advantage of
> being safe in that regard. However, I can live with either approach.
> It is just an edge case after all. :)
I would have it return "\000" because "" < "\000" and is the lowest
value for a string for which this inegality is true. Having "".succ
return "" breaks the implicit assuption that foo < foo.succ.
irb(main):001:0> a = 1
=> 1
irb(main):002:0> a < a.succ
=> true
irb(main):003:0> a = ""
=> ""
irb(main):004:0> a < a.succ
=> false
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
> This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or
> privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication
> in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
> all copies of the communication and any attachments.
>
>
--
I'm trying to launch the internet; so I open a terminal and go
"percent sign 'Internet'" at the prompt and it doesn't work. What
gives??!! -- random troll