From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2007-01-13T09:38:20+09:00
Subject: Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7680 ] a block argument within a block which argument has the same name leaks

Hi,

In message "Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7680 ] a block argument within a block which argument has the same name leaks"
    on Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:19:10 +0900, Evan Phoenix <evan@fallingsnow.net> writes:

|I agree they need work. Why not go back to the rubyconf 2005  
|proposal? I believe it was to allow new vars created in a block to be  
|normal local variables (not dvars). I've discussed the expected  
|behavior of local variables in ruby to new users and this is what  
|they expect.

Evan, I have considered your words for these days, and you gave me an
inspiration.  I think I get an idea.  Thank you.  Stay tuned.

							matz.