[#9854] BUG: ruby-yarv 1.9 undefined method `close' for nil:NilClass in ensure — ville.mattila@...
Hello,
[#9864] String#upto edge case - empty string causes infinite loop — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On 1/8/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
On 1/8/07, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
On 1/9/07, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
[#9869] a block argument within a block which argument has the same name leaks — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #7680, was opened at 2007-01-08 22:53
Hi,
On Jan 8, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi --
Hi,
Hi --
Hi,
Hi,
Evan Phoenix wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Jan 10, 2007, at 8:43 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
[#9897] Time Zone printing differently for 1.8.4 and 1.8.5. — "Jim Freeze" <jim@...>
> ruby -rparsedate -ve 'puts Time.mktime(* ParseDate.parsedate("Thu Nov 02
[#9908] rdoc for 1.8.5 not creating Module docs? — James Britt <james.britt@...>
When running rdoc over the current 1.8.5 source, the resulting HTML file
[#9926] Fix for File and File::Stat to deal with bogus stat.st_size member — <noreply@...>
Patches item #7760, was opened at 2007-01-11 14:26
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Berger, Daniel wrote:
[#9949] sandbox 0.4 (r115) with a new patch — _why <why@...>
Okay, here's the latest release of the freaky freaky sandbox.
[#9959] anonymous classes share single alloc function — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #7974, was opened at 2007-01-18 13:28
[#9960] Scoping and locating definitions — Jos Backus <jos@...>
Consider the following:
Jos Backus schrieb:
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 06:40:03PM +0900, Pit Capitain wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:18:19AM +0900, Jos Backus wrote:
On 1/20/07, Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com> wrote:
Jos Backus schrieb:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 04:39:52AM +0900, Pit Capitain wrote:
Jos Backus schrieb:
[#9969] Allowing Unicode in the grammar? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi Matz,
[#9996] new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal) — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
Hi,
It's late for me here, so I have just brief comments below...
Hi,
SASADA Koichi wrote:
Hi,
On Jan 23, 2007, at 7:41 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, James Edward Gray II wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
The more this discussion goes on, the more I worry that Joe Q Public
Hi,
[#10019] stable branch policy & schedule for 1.8.6 — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Core developers,
Akinori MUSHA wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Jan 23, 2007, at 22:13, Joel VanderWerf wrote:
At Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:13:52 +0900,
Hello,
Hi,
[#10066] class variables and inheritance — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #8156, was opened at 2007-01-25 15:05
[#10068] Re: Method Dispatch (was Adding methods to String, but only in my own Module?) — gwtmp01@...
[#10085] Collaborative Ruby Language Specification — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>
Hi Everyone,
On 1/28/07, John Lam (CLR) <jflam@microsoft.com> wrote:
Hi --
>> I'm not sure what there is to be non-neutral about :-)
Hi --
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
John Lam (CLR) wrote:
> I hope such a spec would be developed "in the open" from the beginning,
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 1/30/07, Eustaquio Rangel de Oliveira Jr. <eustaquiorangel@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 1/30/07, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:
> > I was checking some CLR opinions and - correct me please if I'm wrong - seems
[#10114] add usage of uri.userinfo to open-uri.rb — <noreply@...>
Patches item #8309, was opened at 2007-01-30 15:25
On 2007/01/31, at 06:07, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:19:34AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi matz,
Hi,
On Feb 2, 2007, at 7:40 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#10135] Another .document patch. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I have been looking at the tips for irb at:
[ ruby-Patches-7569 ] RDoc patch for multiple classes and/or modules within C extensions
Patches item #7569, was opened at 2007-01-04 13:09
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1700&aid=7569&group_id=426
Category: Ruby1.8
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Daniel Berger (djberg96)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: RDoc patch for multiple classes and/or modules within C extensions
Initial Comment:
Hi,
As it stands now, if you want to document multiple classes or modules within the same source file you must use the 'Document-class' or 'Document-module' directives in a clunky, standalone fashion. The following patch allows you to document a class or module in the same manner that you would document a method, constant or attribute, i.e. with a comment immediately prior to rb_define_class, rb_define_module, rb_define_class_under or rb_define_module_under.
If a user puts a comment above the "Init_xxx" line, then that comment still has priority, and so this patch is also backwards compatible.
This patch is against 1.8.5p12. It's a little on the ugly side as a result of Ruby's 1.8.x regex engine lack of support for positive lookbehind.
In addition, I've attached a sample C source file that contains a sampling of the sorts of styles I see and use for rb_define_class, etc, so you can see the results when you run rdoc over it.
If accepted, I'll followup with a patch for the text comments at the top of the parse_c.rb file regarding multiple classes and the 'Document-class' directive, etc.
This patch can most likely be refactored for 1.9, where positive lookbehind should enable a single extended regex, instead of the split + scan approach I had to take here.
Regards,
Dan
--- parse_c.orig Thu Jan 4 11:25:41 2007
+++ parse_c.rb Thu Jan 4 12:31:46 2007
@@ -271,6 +271,20 @@
comment = $1
elsif @body =~ %r{Document-(class|module):\s#{class_name}\s*?\n((?>.*?\*/))}m
comment = $2
+ else
+ if @body =~ /rb_define_class|rb_define_module/m
+ class_name = class_name.split("::").last
+ array = []
+ @body.split(/(\/\*.*?\*\/)\s*?\n/m).each_with_index{ |line, index|
+ array[index] = line
+ if line =~ /rb_define_(class|module).*?"(\w+?)"/m
+ if class_name == $2
+ comment = array[index-1]
+ break
+ end
+ end
+ }
+ end
end
class_meth.comment = mangle_comment(comment) if comment
end
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1700&aid=7569&group_id=426