From: Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
Date: 2007-01-13T10:39:00+09:00
Subject: Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7680 ] a block argument within a block which argument has the same name leaks


On Jan 12, 2007, at 4:38 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: [ ruby-Bugs-7680 ] a block argument within a block  
> which argument has the same name leaks"
>     on Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:19:10 +0900, Evan Phoenix  
> <evan@fallingsnow.net> writes:
>
> |I agree they need work. Why not go back to the rubyconf 2005
> |proposal? I believe it was to allow new vars created in a block to be
> |normal local variables (not dvars). I've discussed the expected
> |behavior of local variables in ruby to new users and this is what
> |they expect.
>
> Evan, I have considered your words for these days, and you gave me an
> inspiration.  I think I get an idea.  Thank you.  Stay tuned.

I eagerly await to here to hear what idea you have. The behavior I've  
described is the behavior that rubinius currently has, btw.

   - Evan

>
> 							matz.
>