[#97652] [Ruby master Feature#16746] Endless method definition — mame@...

Issue #16746 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

24 messages 2020/04/01

[#97655] [Ruby master Misc#16747] Repository reorganization request — shyouhei@...

Issue #16747 has been reported by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe).

12 messages 2020/04/01

[#97745] [Ruby master Bug#16769] Struct.new(..., immutable: true) — takashikkbn@...

Issue #16769 has been reported by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).

10 messages 2020/04/08

[#97803] [Ruby master Misc#16775] DevelopersMeeting20200514Japan — mame@...

Issue #16775 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

20 messages 2020/04/10

[#97810] [Ruby master Bug#16776] Regression in coverage library — deivid.rodriguez@...

Issue #16776 has been reported by deivid (David Rodr刕uez).

11 messages 2020/04/10

[#97828] [Ruby master Misc#16778] Should we stop vendoring default gems code? — deivid.rodriguez@...

Issue #16778 has been reported by deivid (David Rodr刕uez).

37 messages 2020/04/11

[#97878] [Ruby master Feature#16786] Light-weight scheduler for improved concurrency. — samuel@...

Issue #16786 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

72 messages 2020/04/14

[#97893] [Ruby master Bug#16787] [patch] allow Dir.home to work for non-login procs when $HOME not set — salewski@...

Issue #16787 has been reported by salewski (Alan Salewski).

18 messages 2020/04/15

[#97905] [Ruby master Feature#16791] Shortcuts for attributes of Process::Status — 0xfffffff0@...

Issue #16791 has been reported by 0x81000000 (/ /).

10 messages 2020/04/16

[#97907] [Ruby master Bug#16792] Make Mutex held per Fiber instead of per Thread — eregontp@...

Issue #16792 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

9 messages 2020/04/16

[#97989] [Ruby master Misc#16802] Prefer use of RHS assigment in documentation — samuel@...

Issue #16802 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

10 messages 2020/04/21

[#97992] [Ruby master Misc#16803] Discussion: those internal macros reside in public API headers — shyouhei@...

Issue #16803 has been reported by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe).

14 messages 2020/04/21

[#98026] [Ruby master Bug#16809] ruby testsuite fails on s390x alpine (musl) with --with-coroutine=copy — ncopa@...

Issue #16809 has been reported by ncopa (Natanael Copa).

11 messages 2020/04/23

[#98034] [Ruby master Feature#16812] Allow slicing arrays with ArithmeticSequence — zverok.offline@...

Issue #16812 has been reported by zverok (Victor Shepelev).

12 messages 2020/04/23

[#98044] [Ruby master Bug#16814] Segmentation fault in GC while running test/ruby/test_fiber.rb on s390x — Rei.Odaira@...

Issue #16814 has been reported by ReiOdaira (Rei Odaira).

14 messages 2020/04/24

[#98059] [Ruby master Bug#16816] Prematurely terminated Enumerator should stay terminated — headius@...

Issue #16816 has been reported by headius (Charles Nutter).

9 messages 2020/04/24

[#98066] [Ruby master Feature#16818] Rename `Range#%` to `Range#/` — sawadatsuyoshi@...

Issue #16818 has been reported by sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada).

11 messages 2020/04/26

[ruby-core:97972] [Ruby master Bug#16797] Array#flatten not checking `respond_to? :to_ary`

From: daniel@...42.com
Date: 2020-04-20 01:41:25 UTC
List: ruby-core #97972
Issue #16797 has been updated by Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme).


Actually what happens here is pretty interesting. This is all done via `rb_check_array_type` which attempts to convert an object by using `to_ary`.

If your object defines its _own_ `respond_to?` method, it is used to determine if `to_ary` exists and should be called.

```ruby
a = Object.new
def a.method_missing(...); Object.new; end
def a.respond_to?(...); super; end
[a].flatten #=> [#<Object:0x000055ca978ce058>]

b = Object.new
def b.to_ary; bug!; end
def b.respond_to?(...); false; end
[b].flatten #=> [#<Object:0x000055ca9789eab0>]
```

Otherwise if the object only has the _default_ `respond_to?` method, its tries to call `method_missing`. NoMethodError is rescued and taken to mean that the object does not respond to `to_ary`, and the object is not flattened.
Without a NoMethodError it means the object effectively responds to `to_ary`, and the return type must be Array.

```ruby
a = Object.new
def a.method_missing(...); 42; end
[a].flatten #=> TypeError (can't convert Object to Array (Object#to_ary gives Integer))

def a.method_missing(...); [[42]]; end
[a].flatten #=> [42]

def a.method_missing(...); super; end #NoMethodError triggered via super
[a].flatten #=> [#<Object:0x00005603341f3b18>]

def a.method_missing(...); 42.foobar; end #NoMethodError is actually because of foobar
[a].flatten #=> [#<Object:0x0000560334024300>]
```


----------------------------------------
Bug #16797: Array#flatten not checking `respond_to? :to_ary`
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16797#change-85202

* Author: UlyssesZhan (有丘 詹)
* Status: Rejected
* Priority: Normal
* ruby -v: ruby 2.7.1p83 (2020-03-31 revision a0c7c23c9c) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
```ruby
def (a = Object.new).method_missing(...)
  Object.new
end
[a].flatten # TypeError
```
It should check whether an object responds to `to_ary` before trying to convert it into an array.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread