[#97652] [Ruby master Feature#16746] Endless method definition — mame@...

Issue #16746 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

24 messages 2020/04/01

[#97655] [Ruby master Misc#16747] Repository reorganization request — shyouhei@...

Issue #16747 has been reported by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe).

12 messages 2020/04/01

[#97745] [Ruby master Bug#16769] Struct.new(..., immutable: true) — takashikkbn@...

Issue #16769 has been reported by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).

10 messages 2020/04/08

[#97803] [Ruby master Misc#16775] DevelopersMeeting20200514Japan — mame@...

Issue #16775 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

20 messages 2020/04/10

[#97810] [Ruby master Bug#16776] Regression in coverage library — deivid.rodriguez@...

Issue #16776 has been reported by deivid (David Rodr刕uez).

11 messages 2020/04/10

[#97828] [Ruby master Misc#16778] Should we stop vendoring default gems code? — deivid.rodriguez@...

Issue #16778 has been reported by deivid (David Rodr刕uez).

37 messages 2020/04/11

[#97878] [Ruby master Feature#16786] Light-weight scheduler for improved concurrency. — samuel@...

Issue #16786 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

72 messages 2020/04/14

[#97893] [Ruby master Bug#16787] [patch] allow Dir.home to work for non-login procs when $HOME not set — salewski@...

Issue #16787 has been reported by salewski (Alan Salewski).

18 messages 2020/04/15

[#97905] [Ruby master Feature#16791] Shortcuts for attributes of Process::Status — 0xfffffff0@...

Issue #16791 has been reported by 0x81000000 (/ /).

10 messages 2020/04/16

[#97907] [Ruby master Bug#16792] Make Mutex held per Fiber instead of per Thread — eregontp@...

Issue #16792 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

9 messages 2020/04/16

[#97989] [Ruby master Misc#16802] Prefer use of RHS assigment in documentation — samuel@...

Issue #16802 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

10 messages 2020/04/21

[#97992] [Ruby master Misc#16803] Discussion: those internal macros reside in public API headers — shyouhei@...

Issue #16803 has been reported by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe).

14 messages 2020/04/21

[#98026] [Ruby master Bug#16809] ruby testsuite fails on s390x alpine (musl) with --with-coroutine=copy — ncopa@...

Issue #16809 has been reported by ncopa (Natanael Copa).

11 messages 2020/04/23

[#98034] [Ruby master Feature#16812] Allow slicing arrays with ArithmeticSequence — zverok.offline@...

Issue #16812 has been reported by zverok (Victor Shepelev).

12 messages 2020/04/23

[#98044] [Ruby master Bug#16814] Segmentation fault in GC while running test/ruby/test_fiber.rb on s390x — Rei.Odaira@...

Issue #16814 has been reported by ReiOdaira (Rei Odaira).

14 messages 2020/04/24

[#98059] [Ruby master Bug#16816] Prematurely terminated Enumerator should stay terminated — headius@...

Issue #16816 has been reported by headius (Charles Nutter).

9 messages 2020/04/24

[#98066] [Ruby master Feature#16818] Rename `Range#%` to `Range#/` — sawadatsuyoshi@...

Issue #16818 has been reported by sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada).

11 messages 2020/04/26

[ruby-core:98036] [Ruby master Feature#16812] Allow slicing arrays with ArithmeticSequence

From: eregontp@...
Date: 2020-04-23 20:04:40 UTC
List: ruby-core #98036
Issue #16812 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).


Rather neutral on this, but would you want that to work for `Array#[]=` too?
I would be against `Array#[]=` as it's already so complicated and that would just make it a lot more so.

In `Array#[]` it's probably fine though.

----------------------------------------
Feature #16812: Allow slicing arrays with ArithmeticSequence
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16812#change-85265

* Author: zverok (Victor Shepelev)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
I believe when concepts of ArithmeticSequence and `Range#%` were introduced, one of the main intended usages was array slicing in scientific data processing. So, it seems to make sense to allow this in `Array#[]`:

```ruby
ary[(5..20) % 2] # each second element between 5 and 20
ary[(0..) % 3] # each third element
ary[10.step(by: -1)] # elements 10, 9, 8, 7 ....
```

PR is [here](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3055).

My reasoning is as follows:
1. As stated above, ArithmeticSequence and `Range#%` seem to have been introduced exactly for this goal
2. Python has its slicing syntax as `begin:end:step` (with a possibility to omit either), and it seems to be well respected and used feature for data processing. So I believe it is useful, and relatively easy to integrate into existing functionality

I expect the usual "it is ugly and unreadable!" backlash. 
I don't have an incentive, nor energy, to "defend" the proposal, so I would not.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread