[#97678] [Ruby master Feature#16752] :private param for const_set — bughitgithub@...
Issue #16752 has been reported by bughit (bug hit).
5 messages
2020/04/02
[ruby-core:97807] [Ruby master Feature#16428] Add Array#uniq?, Enumerable#uniq?
From:
yanagi@...
Date:
2020-04-10 16:06:38 UTC
List:
ruby-core #97807
Issue #16428 has been updated by kyanagi (Kouhei Yanagita).
In my cases, I (server side) only had to check duplication because a client also have validations.
Legal users can't send a request with duplicates, so detailed error message was not required.
(If needed, I could investigate logged request.)
`uniq!`'s return value is also usable, but I think `uniq?` is more fitting.
(I'd like to check duplication, not to get uniq array.)
----------------------------------------
Feature #16428: Add Array#uniq?, Enumerable#uniq?
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16428#change-85026
* Author: kyanagi (Kouhei Yanagita)
* Status: Feedback
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
I propose Array#uniq?.
I often need to check if an array have duplicate elements.
This method returns true if no duplicates are found in self, otherwise returns false.
If a block is given, it will use the return value of the block for comparison.
This is equivalent to `array.uniq.size == array.size`, but faster.
```
% ~/tmp/r/bin/ruby -rbenchmark/ips -e 'a = Array.new(100) { rand(1000) }; Benchmark.ips { |x| x.report("uniq") { a.uniq.size == a.size }; x.report("uniq?") { a.uniq? } }'
Warming up --------------------------------------
uniq 25.765k i/100ms
uniq? 76.544k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
uniq 278.144k (4.1%) i/s - 1.391M in 5.010858s
uniq? 981.868k (ア 5.1%) i/s - 4.975M in 5.081611s
```
I think the name `uniq?` is natural because Array already has `uniq`.
patch: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/2762
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>