[ruby-core:97802] [Ruby master Feature#16428] Add Array#uniq?, Enumerable#uniq?

Issue #16428 has been updated by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe).


kyanagi (Kouhei Yanagita) wrote in #note-5:
> I was developing mobile games, and I met these situations:
> =

> A card deck can't have duplicate characters.
> i.e. `deck.cards.map(&:character_id).uniq.size =3D=3D deck.cards.size`
> -> `deck.cards.map(&:character_id).uniq?` or `deck.cards.uniq?(&:characte=
r_id)`

So you just want to test?  Why doesn't `deck.cards.map(...).uniq!`'s return=
 value work?

> When players compose items, each of them should be different.
> i.e. `materials.map(&:item_id).uniq.size =3D=3D materials.size`
> -> `materials.map(&:item_id).uniq?` or `materials.uniq?(&:item_id)`

So you just want to test?  Don't you want to show the duplicated materials =
to the players?  Does `uniq?` help then?

> Another situation:
> =

> I developed a registration form for relay runners.
> A request body is like this:
> ```
> # Missing sections are allowed. You can send them later.
> [
>   { section: 1, name: 'aaa' },
>   { section: 3, name: 'bbb' },
>   { section: 5, name: 'ccc' },
> ]
> ```
> In this case, duplication of `section` is not allowed.
> `runners.map(&:section).uniq.size =3D=3D runners.size`
> -> `runners.map(&:section).uniq?` or `runners.uniq?(&:section)`

So you just want to test?  Don't you want to render error message about wha=
t is the duplicated section?  Does `uniq?` help then?

> I think `uniq?` is easier to write and read than `x.uniq.size =3D=3D x.si=
ze`
> for expression of no duplication. It's even faster.

My main question is: it isn't faster when you render error messages.  How d=
o you use it?

> This check is also found in Ruby's repository (bundler):
> https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/master/spec/bundler/support/matchers.rb=
#L84

Honestlt I don't understand what this matcher is trying to achieve.

----------------------------------------
Feature #16428: Add Array#uniq?, Enumerable#uniq?
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16428#change-85018

* Author: kyanagi (Kouhei Yanagita)
* Status: Feedback
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
I propose Array#uniq?.

I often need to check if an array have duplicate elements.

This method returns true if no duplicates are found in self, otherwise retu=
rns false.
If a block is given, it will use the return value of the block for comparis=
on.

This is equivalent to `array.uniq.size =3D=3D array.size`, but faster.

```
% ~/tmp/r/bin/ruby -rbenchmark/ips -e 'a =3D Array.new(100) { rand(1000) };=
 Benchmark.ips { |x| x.report("uniq") { a.uniq.size =3D=3D a.size }; x.repo=
rt("uniq?") { a.uniq? } }'
Warming up --------------------------------------
                uniq    25.765k i/100ms
               uniq?    76.544k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
                uniq    278.144k (=B1 4.1%) i/s -      1.391M in   5.010858s
               uniq?    981.868k (=B1 5.1%) i/s -      4.975M in   5.081611s
```

I think the name `uniq?` is natural because Array already has `uniq`.

patch: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/2762



-- =

https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:[e-mail]?subject=3Dunsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>