[#97086] [Ruby master Bug#16612] Enumerator::ArithmeticSequence#last with float range produces incorrect value — muraken@...
Issue #16612 has been updated by mrkn (Kenta Murata).
4 messages
2020/02/07
[#97307] [Ruby master Feature#16663] Add block or filtered forms of Kernel#caller to allow early bail-out — headius@...
Issue #16663 has been reported by headius (Charles Nutter).
29 messages
2020/02/28
[ruby-core:97310] [Ruby master Feature#16665] Add an Array#except_index method
From:
alexandr1golubenko@...
Date:
2020-02-29 14:46:05 UTC
List:
ruby-core #97310
Issue #16665 has been reported by alex_golubenko (Alex Golubenko).
----------------------------------------
Feature #16665: Add an Array#except_index method
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16665
* Author: alex_golubenko (Alex Golubenko)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
The main idea is to implement a method that we can use to exclude elements from the array by their indices.
For example:
``` ruby
%w( a b c d e f).except_index(0, -1)
=> ["b", "c", "d", "e"]
%w( a b c d e f g h ).except_index(0..1, 3, -2..-1)
=> ["c", "e", "f"]
```
I was meeting many questions on the StackOverflow about how to do such functionality also found many topics about it.
So I think it might a helpful addition.
I spent a few days finding the proper solution on Ruby that might be acceptable with integers and ranges(both positive and negative) and has good performance:
```ruby
def except_index(*indexes)
indexes.each_with_object(dup) do |ind, obj|
ind.is_a?(Range) ? ind.each { |i| obj[i] = false } : obj[ind] = false
end.select(&:itself)
end
```
As you can see it's have not the best readability so I think it's a good point to add a built-in method on C.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>