[#97086] [Ruby master Bug#16612] Enumerator::ArithmeticSequence#last with float range produces incorrect value — muraken@...
Issue #16612 has been updated by mrkn (Kenta Murata).
4 messages
2020/02/07
[#97307] [Ruby master Feature#16663] Add block or filtered forms of Kernel#caller to allow early bail-out — headius@...
Issue #16663 has been reported by headius (Charles Nutter).
29 messages
2020/02/28
[ruby-core:97104] [Ruby master Bug#16618] Rescue called twice when raise in ensure
From:
davidsiaw@...
Date:
2020-02-10 02:13:52 UTC
List:
ruby-core #97104
Issue #16618 has been reported by davidsiaw (David Siaw). ---------------------------------------- Bug #16618: Rescue called twice when raise in ensure https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16618 * Author: davidsiaw (David Siaw) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 2.6.5p114 (2019-10-01 revision 67812) [x86_64-linux-musl] * Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Under very specific circumstances (a `return` with code after it), a `raise` in an `ensure` block causes the `ensure` block to be called twice after rescuing in a `rescue` block above it. Here is a very small reproduction case: ```ruby class ABC < StandardError; end def meow return puts 'a' rescue ABC puts 'rescue' ensure puts 'ensure' raise ABC end meow ``` Causes the output ``` ensure rescue ensure Traceback (most recent call last): 1: from spec/meow.rb:13:in `<main>' spec/meow.rb:10:in `meow': ABC (ABC) ``` However, if I remove the code below the `return`, the behavior is more reasonable: ```ruby class ABC < StandardError; end def meow return rescue ABC puts 'rescue' ensure puts 'ensure' raise ABC end meow ``` ``` ensure Traceback (most recent call last): 1: from spec/meow.rb:14:in `<main>' spec/meow.rb:9:in `meow': ABC (ABC) ``` It does not seem to matter what code comes after `return`. It also does not seem to matter what code comes before the `return`, as long as the `return` is run. It could throw errors or it might not, but there seems to be a definite requirement that there is code after the `return` for this bug to occur. Possibly related to #13930? I am not sure. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>