[#97086] [Ruby master Bug#16612] Enumerator::ArithmeticSequence#last with float range produces incorrect value — muraken@...
Issue #16612 has been updated by mrkn (Kenta Murata).
4 messages
2020/02/07
[#97307] [Ruby master Feature#16663] Add block or filtered forms of Kernel#caller to allow early bail-out — headius@...
Issue #16663 has been reported by headius (Charles Nutter).
29 messages
2020/02/28
[ruby-core:97242] [Ruby master Misc#16644] why is potential dynamic constant assignment an error when actual dynamic constant assignment is only a warning
From:
merch-redmine@...
Date:
2020-02-22 19:07:46 UTC
List:
ruby-core #97242
Issue #16644 has been updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans).
Backport deleted (2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN)
ruby -v deleted (ruby 2.7.0p0 (2019-12-25 revision 647ee6f091) [x86_64-linux])
Tracker changed from Bug to Misc
These are two different things. Ruby always warns for assigning to an existing constant, regardless of using `const_set` or `CONST = ...`. It does not support using `CONST = ...` inside a method, though `const_set` is allowed. Similarly, you can use `Class.new` and `Module.new` to define classes and modules in method bodies, but you can't use the `class` or `module` keywords directly in method bodies.
This behavior exists at least back to 1.8, and probably before that. I'm fairly sure this is the expected behavior. If you would like the behavior changed, please submit a feature request.
I realize this does not directly answer the question in the issue subject. I'm switching this to the Misc tracker, since this is not a bug report.
----------------------------------------
Misc #16644: why is potential dynamic constant assignment an error when actual dynamic constant assignment is only a warning
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16644#change-84353
* Author: bughit (bug hit)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
```rb
module Mod1
def self.define_consts
const_set(:CONST1, :CONST1)
# this is actual const re-assignment but only a warning
const_set(:CONST1, :CONST1)
# this is const initialization but becomes an error
# because it looks like it could be re-assignment
# if actual const re-assignment is only a warning
# why is a possible const re-assignment (which might not be one), an error
self::CONST2 = :CONST2 unless const_defined?(:CONST2, false)
end
define_consts
end
```
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>