[#97536] [Ruby master Bug#16694] JIT vs hardened GCC with PCH — v.ondruch@...
Issue #16694 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch).
11 messages
2020/03/18
[ruby-core:97420] [Ruby master Feature#16665] Add an Array#except_index method
From:
daniel@...42.com
Date:
2020-03-09 13:31:32 UTC
List:
ruby-core #97420
Issue #16665 has been updated by Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme).
That implementation would return an empty array for `[true,nil,nil].except_index(0)`
Probably something a bit more like this:
```ruby
@@undef = Object.new #using Qundef in C
def except_index(*indexes)
result = dup
indexes.each do |ind|
if ind.is_a?(Range)
ind.each{ |i| result[i] = @@undef }
else
result[ind] = @@undef
end
end
result.reject!{ |e| e == @@undef }
result
end
```
It's fun enough to implement, but is there a real-world use for this? I can't think of one. Usually if you want to remove elements from a list you'd use `reject`; having a list of indexes as an intermediary step seems like quite an unusual situation to me. Just because there's a positive counterpart doesn't mean we need a negative counterpart "for the sake of consistency".
----------------------------------------
Feature #16665: Add an Array#except_index method
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16665#change-84553
* Author: alex_golubenko (Alex Golubenko)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
The main idea is to implement a method that we can use to exclude elements from the array by their indices.
For example:
``` ruby
%w( a b c d e f).except_index(0, -1)
=> ["b", "c", "d", "e"]
%w( a b c d e f g h ).except_index(0..1, 3, -2..-1)
=> ["c", "e", "f"]
```
I was meeting many questions on the StackOverflow about how to do such functionality also found many topics about it.
So I think it might a helpful addition.
I spent a few days finding the proper solution on Ruby that might be acceptable with integers and ranges(both positive and negative) and has good performance:
```ruby
def except_index(*indexes)
indexes.each_with_object(dup) do |ind, obj|
ind.is_a?(Range) ? ind.each { |i| obj[i] = false } : obj[ind] = false
end.select(&:itself)
end
```
As you can see it's have not the best readability so I think it's a good point to add a built-in method on C.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>