[#97536] [Ruby master Bug#16694] JIT vs hardened GCC with PCH — v.ondruch@...
Issue #16694 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch).
11 messages
2020/03/18
[ruby-core:97320] [Ruby master Feature#16667] Allow parameters to Symbol#to_proc and Method#to_proc
From:
sawadatsuyoshi@...
Date:
2020-03-01 17:31:19 UTC
List:
ruby-core #97320
Issue #16667 has been updated by sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada).
I am not sure how allowing parameters to `Symbol#to_proc` and `Method#to_proc` would make:
```ruby
ary.map(:dig.to_proc(:id))
```
possible as `Array#map` does not take an argument. What do you want it to return?
Needless to say, it is entirely unclear how that, if possible, would replace:
```ruby
ary.map { |e| e.dig(:id) }
```
or how it is superior to writing like:
```ruby
ary.map { _1.dig(:id) }
```
----------------------------------------
Feature #16667: Allow parameters to Symbol#to_proc and Method#to_proc
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16667#change-84443
* Author: jgomo3 (Jes俍 Gez)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
Allow parameters to Symbol#to_proc and Method#to_proc
So we can say:
``` ruby
ary.map(:dig.to_proc(:id))
```
Instead of
``` ruby
ary.map { |e| e.dig(:id) }
```
Oppening the posibilities to refine the `&` operator in the future, for something like:
``` ruby
ary.map(&(:dig, :id))
```
Related:
* https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11161
* https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16435
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>