[#97319] [Ruby master Feature#16667] Allow parameters to Symbol#to_proc and Method#to_proc — jgomo3@...

Issue #16667 has been reported by jgomo3 (Jes=FAs G=F3mez).

10 messages 2020/03/01

[#97344] [Ruby master Feature#16670] Reverse order of `expression` in `pattern` for 1-line pattern matching while it's still experimental — ttilberg@...

Issue #16670 has been reported by ttilberg (Tim Tilberg).

9 messages 2020/03/03

[#97355] [Ruby master Misc#16671] BASERUBY version policy — ko1@...

Issue #16671 has been reported by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).

10 messages 2020/03/04

[#97359] [Ruby master Bug#16672] net/http leaves original content-length header intact after inflating response — justin.reid@...

Issue #16672 has been reported by jmreid (Justin Reid).

15 messages 2020/03/04

[#97390] [Ruby master Bug#16677] Negative integer powered (**) to a float number results in a complex — camille.drapier@...

Issue #16677 has been reported by CamilleDrapier (Camille Drapier).

25 messages 2020/03/07

[#97410] [Ruby master Bug#16680] [Breaking Change] Ruby 2.7 not support symlinks folder in $LOAD_PATH to work with autoload. — vil963@...

SXNzdWUgIzE2NjgwIGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IHp3OTYzIChXZWkgWmhlbmcpLg0KDQot

8 messages 2020/03/07

[#97416] [Ruby master Bug#16682] Ruby 2.7.0p0 crash on exit if there is an active RUBY_INTERNAL_EVENT_GC_EXIT tracepoint — jean.boussier@...

Issue #16682 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

16 messages 2020/03/09

[#97448] [Ruby master Feature#16688] Allow #to_path object as argument to system() — daniel@...42.com

Issue #16688 has been reported by Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme).

12 messages 2020/03/11

[#97528] [Ruby master Misc#16693] DevelopersMeeting20200410Japan — mame@...

Issue #16693 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

12 messages 2020/03/16

[#97536] [Ruby master Bug#16694] JIT vs hardened GCC with PCH — v.ondruch@...

Issue #16694 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch).

11 messages 2020/03/18

[#97538] [Ruby master Bug#16695] Stack consistency error when using the return value — s.wakeup31@...

Issue #16695 has been reported by s4ichi (takamasa saichi).

10 messages 2020/03/18

[#97554] [Ruby master Bug#16697] Hash.ruby2_keywords_hash?(value) should support any object — eregontp@...

Issue #16697 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

12 messages 2020/03/19

[#97588] [Ruby master Feature#16739] Allow Hash#keys and Hash#values to accept a block for filtering output — jacobevelyn@...

SXNzdWUgIzE2NzM5IGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IGphY29iZXZlbHluIChKYWNvYiBFdmVs

7 messages 2020/03/24

[#97609] [Ruby master Bug#16740] Deprecating and removing the broken Process.clock_getres — eregontp@...

Issue #16740 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

14 messages 2020/03/28

[#97621] [Ruby master Bug#16743] problem with multi threading [BUG] Segmentation fault — pauloo.jansen@...

Issue #16743 has been reported by paulorja (paulo jansen).

12 messages 2020/03/29

[#97629] [Ruby master Feature#16744] Flag to load current bundle without using bundle exec — headius@...

Issue #16744 has been reported by headius (Charles Nutter).

11 messages 2020/03/30

[ruby-core:97361] [Ruby master Bug#16660] Struct#deconstruct_keys inconsistent behavior

From: dementiev.vm@...
Date: 2020-03-04 23:42:30 UTC
List: ruby-core #97361
Issue #16660 has been updated by palkan (Vladimir Dementyev).


(For some reason cannot edit the original post).


> Prior to that change an empty hash was returned in both cases.

I think, the less confusing behavior would be to ignore the unknown keys without "failing fast" (i.e., returning an empty Hash if key is unknown). 

That is:

```ruby
s.deconstruct_keys([:a, :c])
#=> {a: 1}

s.deconstruct_keys([:a, :b, :c])
#=> {a: 1, b: 2}
```

IMO, that better reflects the pattern matching: if some key is present in one pattern (one key set), it must be present in another pattern with the same key.

I guess, that have been done for optimization (fail-fast if more keys then we have) but I believe that such optimization should be done within the pattern matching implementation, not a particular class API. The proposed behaviour would be even easier to optimize (e.g., we can re-use the deconstruction hash for keys subsets or cache the result of the key presence check).

----------------------------------------
Bug #16660: Struct#deconstruct_keys inconsistent behavior 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16660#change-84488

* Author: palkan (Vladimir Dementyev)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* ruby -v: ruby 2.7.0p0 (2019-12-25 revision 647ee6f091) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Here is an example of a kind of surprising (at least to me) `Struct#deconstruct_keys` behaviour:

```ruby
klass = Struct.new(:a, :b)
s = klass.new(1, 2)
```

1) When some keys are not recognized and the total number of the keys is not greater than the size of the struct:

```ruby
s.deconstruct_keys([:a, :c])
#=> {a: 1}
```

2) When some keys are not recognized but the total number of the keys is greater than the size of the struct:

```ruby
s.deconstruct_keys([:a, :b, :c])
#=> {}
```

It's not clear why the first one filters unknown keys and the latter one returns an empty Hash instead of the `{a: 1}`.

This behaviour was introduced in https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/2439948bcc0ec9daf91cf79301195e59bad49aff. Prior to that change an empty hash was returned in both cases.






-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread