From: Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>
Date: 2013-03-12T16:35:43+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:53331] Re: [CommonRuby - Feature #7701] Non-optional (required) keyword args

I am thinking
  def meth(a, b: 0, c: required)
or so would be nice to read, and it could simply be required defined
as a method raising an exception (it would be tricky to get the
missing keyword argument name though),
but of course that might be a namespace problem.

On 11 March 2013 02:47, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
> (2013/03/09 17:12), headius (Charles Nutter) wrote:
>> There's also probably no code out there that relies on the behavior ko1 pointed out. I think it's safe.
>
> It is *my preference*, I don't like empty value (foo:).
> But no idea what should we put it in.
>
> --
> // SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net
>