From: "D. Deryl Downey" <me@...>
Date: 2013-04-01T09:22:07+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:53856] Re: An evaluation of 2.0.0 release

--f46d04016b3b4a622804d9419c9c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I'm definitely not trying to ne a jerk here. However, I do feel the need to
ask, did people somehow NOT expect to have to make significant changes, nor
expect there would be significant challenges going forward from 1.9 to 2.0?

Please tell me I'm just in a dark mood and so just reading a negative vibe
into the comments so far. Matz and others did say there were going to be a
great many changes made, with some incompatiblities.

Am I misreading a listing of what people have run into as a list of
complaints against the changes needed to deal with a Major version rollout?

I'm seriously asking because I'm known for assuming whining where folks are
merely enumerating issues they've run into.

--f46d04016b3b4a622804d9419c9c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<p>I&#39;m definitely not trying to ne a jerk here. However, I do feel the need to ask, did people somehow NOT expect to have to make significant changes, nor expect there would be significant challenges going forward from 1.9 to 2.0?</p>

<p>Please tell me I&#39;m just in a dark mood and so just reading a negative vibe into the comments so far. Matz and others did say there were going to be a great many changes made, with some incompatiblities. </p>
<p>Am I misreading a listing of what people have run into as a list of complaints against the changes needed to deal with a Major version rollout?</p>
<p>I&#39;m seriously asking because I&#39;m known for assuming whining where folks are merely enumerating issues they&#39;ve run into.</p>

--f46d04016b3b4a622804d9419c9c--