[#38647] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5130][Open] Thread.pass sticks on OpenBSD — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>

16 messages 2011/08/01

[#38653] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5135][Open] Ruby 1.9.3-preview1 tests fails in Fedora Rawhide — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>

31 messages 2011/08/01

[#38666] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>

61 messages 2011/08/01
[#38667] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/08/01

On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 07:35:15AM +0900, Yehuda Katz wrote:

[#38669] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2011/08/01

(08/02/2011 07:46 AM), Aaron Patterson wrote:

[#38671] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/08/01

Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#38695] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5144][Open] Remove GPL file from repository — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>

17 messages 2011/08/02

[#38706] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5147][Open] mkmf should not require static library when ruby is built with --enable-shared — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>

9 messages 2011/08/02

[#38894] Why Ruby has versioned paths? — V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>

Hello, could somebody please elaborate about reasons why Ruby uses versioned

9 messages 2011/08/10

[#38972] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5193][Open] ruby_thread_data_type linker errors fixed with RUBY_EXTERN — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>

28 messages 2011/08/16

[#38980] :symbol.is_a?(String) — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>

http://viewsourcecode.org/why/redhanded/inspect/SymbolIs_aString.html

8 messages 2011/08/16

[#39025] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5206][Open] ruby -K should warn — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

14 messages 2011/08/19

[#39062] Releasing r33028 as Ruby 1.9.3 RC1 — Yugui <yugui@...>

Hi,

17 messages 2011/08/23

[#39093] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5227][Open] Float#round fails on corner cases — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

14 messages 2011/08/24
[#39115] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5227][Assigned] Float#round fails on corner cases — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/08/26

[#39126] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5227][Assigned] Float#round fails on corner cases — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2011/08/26

Hi

[#39120] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5233][Open] OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket has problems with encodings other than "ascii" — Niklas Baumstark <niklas.baumstark@...>

9 messages 2011/08/26

[#39142] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5239][Open] bootstraptest/runner.rb: assert_normal_exit logic broken on Debian/GNU kFreeBSD — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>

11 messages 2011/08/27

[#39162] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5244][Open] Continuation causes Bus Error on Debian sparc — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>

29 messages 2011/08/28

[ruby-core:38780] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5135] Ruby 1.9.3-preview1 tests fails in Fedora Rawhide

From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
Date: 2011-08-04 10:06:12 UTC
List: ruby-core #38780
> Actually I am building Ruby 1.9.3 from SRPM [1] in mock, i.e. using Koji [2]. Here [3] you can see the build output and the build failures (note that the output slightly differs, since the test are not stable for some reason I don't understand).
>
> Also note that I am actually executing the test suite after "make install" as you can see either from the log [3] or from spec file [4], however it does not mean that the newly installed Ruby becomes available in the $PATH, which is probably what you expect.

Yup, I expected.
I think following two test failure indicate such issue. This is hard
to fix properly because Webrick is micro web server. and adding
careless knob for loading another executable files
might make security issue in future.

Therefore I hope you avoid this issue by your test environment craft.


 51) Failure:
test_cgi(TestWEBrickCGI)
[/builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-1.9.3-preview1/test/webrick/test_cgi.rb:33]:
webrick log start:
  [2011-08-04 08:47:33] INFO  WEBrick 1.3.1
  [2011-08-04 08:47:33] INFO  ruby 1.9.3 (2011-07-31) [x86_64-linux]
  [2011-08-04 08:47:33] INFO  WEBrick::HTTPServer#start: pid=27133 port=52289
  [2011-08-04 08:47:33] ERROR CGIHandler:
/builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-1.9.3-preview1/test/webrick/webrick.cgi:
  /builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-1.9.3-preview1/ruby: error while loading
shared libraries: libruby.so.1.9: cannot open shared object file: No
such file or directory
  [2011-08-04 08:47:33] ERROR CGIHandler:
/builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-1.9.3-preview1/test/webrick/webrick.cgi
exit with 127
  [2011-08-04 08:47:33] ERROR Premature end of script headers:
/builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-1.9.3-preview1/test/webrick/webrick.cgi

webrick log end.
<"/webrick.cgi"> expected but was
<"<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \"-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN\">\n<HTML>\n
<HEAD><TITLE>Internal Server Error</TITLE></HEAD>\n  <BODY>\n
<H1>Internal Server Error</H1>\n    Premature end of script headers:
/builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-1.9.3-preview1/test/webrick/webrick.cgi\n
 <HR>\n    <ADDRESS>\n     WEBrick/1.3.1 (Ruby/1.9.3/2011-07-31)
OpenSSL/1.0.0d at\n     127.0.0.1:52289\n    </ADDRESS>\n
</BODY>\n</HTML>\n">.
 52) Failure:
test_script_disclosure(WEBrick::TestFileHandler)
[/builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-1.9.3-preview1/test/webrick/test_filehandler.rb:264]:
webrick log start:
  [2011-08-04 08:47:47] INFO  WEBrick 1.3.1
  [2011-08-04 08:47:47] INFO  ruby 1.9.3 (2011-07-31) [x86_64-linux]
  [2011-08-04 08:47:47] INFO  WEBrick::HTTPServer#start: pid=27133 port=52263
  [2011-08-04 08:47:47] ERROR CGIHandler:
/builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-1.9.3-preview1/test/webrick/webrick.cgi:
  /builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-1.9.3-preview1/ruby: error while loading
shared libraries: libruby.so.1.9: cannot open shared object file: No
such file or directory
  [2011-08-04 08:47:47] ERROR CGIHandler:
/builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-1.9.3-preview1/test/webrick/webrick.cgi
exit with 127
  [2011-08-04 08:47:47] ERROR Premature end of script headers:
/builddir/build/BUILD/ruby-1.9.3-preview1/test/webrick/webrick.cgi

webrick log end.
<"200"> expected but was
<"500">.

In This Thread