From: Jon Date: 2011-09-05T04:55:02+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:39262] Re: Releasing r33028 as Ruby 1.9.3 RC1 --00151747b4c22de18304ac22f8a8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > We are still suffering from a sample/test.rb failure for system(), > [ruby-core:39234], Bug #5268 > > http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5268 > > We can't complete make check under MinGW > > Seems to be associated with r33165. Assigned to Nakada-san and made it > high priority. > I think it has been fixed already, right? > Last night, it still failed for me as of 1.9.3dev@33179 from the git mirror...no failures when building trunk at 1.9.4dev@33177. I will try building ruby_1_9_3 again today. I haven't had a chance to confirm, but are you sure Nobu's https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/74f724de1acf9773a4220dedb544b80d4a7311a5patch has been backported to ruby_1_9_3? Luis...can you repro the failure with the latest HEAD from ruby_1_9_3? FYI, I saw failures with TDM GCC 4.5.2 using both mingwrt-3.18 and the recently released mingwrt-3.20. Jon --- blog: http://jonforums.github.com/ twitter: @jonforums "Anyone who can only think of one way to spell a word obviously lacks imagination." - Mark Twain --00151747b4c22de18304ac22f8a8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> We are still suffering from a sample/test.rb failure for system()= ,
> [ruby-core:39234], Bug #5268
>
> http://redmine.ruby-lang= .org/issues/5268
>
> We can't complete make check under MinGW
>
> S= eems to be associated with r33165. Assigned to Nakada-san and made it
&g= t; high priority.

I think it has been fixed already, right?

=A0
=A0
Last night, it still failed for me as of= 1.9.3dev@33179 from the git mirror..= .no failures when building trunk at 1.9.4= dev@33177. I will try building ruby_1_9_3 again today.
=A0
I haven't had a chance to confirm, but are you sure = Nobu's https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/74f724de1acf97= 73a4220dedb544b80d4a7311a5 patch has been backported to ruby_1_9_3?
=A0
Luis...can you repro the failure with the latest HEAD fr= om ruby_1_9_3? FYI, I saw failures with TDM GCC 4.5.2 using both mingwrt-3.= 18 and the recently released mingwrt-3.20.
=A0
Jon
---
blog: http://jonforums= .github.com/
twitter: @jonforums
=A0
"Anyon= e who can only think of one way to spell a word obviously lacks imagination= ." - Mark Twain

--00151747b4c22de18304ac22f8a8--