[#39260] RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>

Before the release of Ruby 1.9.2 it was decided that Ruby releases

59 messages 2011/09/04
[#39276] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/05

2011/9/5 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca>:

[#39325] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/09/07

I'll jump in with some context from the JRuby perspective.

[#39335] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/07

2011/9/7 Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com>:

[#39365] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/09/08

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:17 AM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:

[#39366] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/09/08

Hi,

[#39370] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Michael Klishin <michael.s.klishin@...> 2011/09/08

Yukihiro Matsumoto:

[#39374] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/08

(2011/09/09 1:29), Michael Klishin wrote:

[#39376] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/09/08

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:19 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:

[#39379] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Masaya TARUI <tarui@...> 2011/09/08

Hello Luis,

[#39382] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/09/08

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Masaya TARUI <tarui@prx.jp> wrote:

[#39386] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/09/08

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[#39267] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5273][Open] Float#round returns the wrong floats for higher precision — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

14 messages 2011/09/04

[#39435] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5306][Open] Application Hangs Due to Recent rb_thread_select Changes — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>

27 messages 2011/09/09

[#39498] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5310][Open] Integral objects — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>

13 messages 2011/09/13

[#39539] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5321][Open] Introducing Numeric#exact? and Numeric#inexact? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>

26 messages 2011/09/14

[#39629] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5341][Open] Add SSL session reuse to Net::HTTP — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

18 messages 2011/09/19

[#39634] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5343][Open] Unexpected blocking behavior when interrupt Socket#accept — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>

10 messages 2011/09/20

[#39673] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5353][Open] TLS v1.0 and less - Attack on CBC mode — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

13 messages 2011/09/22

[#39700] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5364][Open] How about new syntax: "object.\method" returns a Method instance? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>

20 messages 2011/09/25

[#39740] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Alex Young <alex@...>

18 messages 2011/09/27
[#39743] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/09/27

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Alex Young wrote:

[#39754] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Alex Young <alex@...> 2011/09/27

On 27/09/2011 19:46, Aaron Patterson wrote:

[#39807] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2011/10/01

On Sep 27, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Alex Young wrote:

[#39751] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5375][Open] [mingw32] segfault on WinXP SP3 with 1.9.3dev@33347 — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

26 messages 2011/09/27

[#39772] ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2011/09/29
[#39774] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/09/29

Hi,

[#39796] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5384][Open] Ruby 1.9.3-RC1 Fails to Compile on Solaris — Cyrus Lopez <cyrus@...>

11 messages 2011/09/30

[ruby-core:39449] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5197][Rejected] at_exit order has changed in 1.9.3dev32413

From: Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>
Date: 2011-09-10 12:07:53 UTC
List: ruby-core #39449
Issue #5197 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.

Status changed from Feedback to Rejected

> What I need is this:
> 
> 1) minitest, like test/unit before it, runs its tests via at_exit.
> 2) Users need to be able to register code to run AFTER the tests run (for extra reporting, or > resource cleanup). This was usually done with:
>
>    at_exit { at_exit { codes } }

Yeah, It's clearly bad code.

quote from [ruby-core:35254]. Matz wrote, 
> OK, I choose C's behavior.  Although I don't recommend to rely too
> much on the atexit order.  Motohiro, could you check in?

I'm stand aside matz. don't do that.



> which I wrapped up in a method called #after_tests(&b).
>
> Now that doesn't work. 

Not now. It has been broken long time.
Even if I revert MRI change, It doesn't work on other ruby implementation.

So, I don't understand why we need revert the code even if it doesn't solve the problem.


> I need some mechanism to make this work as its been available this way for 10+ years. 
> I don't care what mechanism I wind up using, as long as it works.

I pity the 10+ years broken code.
And one correction. This behavior was introduced following commit. see date.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
commit a3e1b1ce7ed7e7ffac23015fc2fde56511b30681
Author: ko1 <ko1@b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e>
Date:   Sun Dec 31 15:02:22 2006 +0000

        * Merge YARV

    git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@11439 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e


Last of all.
But, as far as that a revert solve a issue, I'd like to choose a revert. Please remember it.

Thanks.




----------------------------------------
Bug #5197: at_exit order has changed in 1.9.3dev32413
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5197

Author: Ryan Davis
Status: Rejected
Priority: Normal
Assignee: Motohiro KOSAKI
Category: core
Target version: 1.9.3
ruby -v: 1.9.3dev32413


I could have sworn I filed or mailed this before, but I can't find it. Sorry if this is a dupe.

#!/usr/bin/ruby -w

happy = false
at_exit { happy = true }                                # test runner
at_exit { at_exit { abort "not happy!" unless happy } } # after test hook

# multiruby produces:

# VERSION = mri_trunk
# CMD     = ~/.multiruby/install/mri_trunk/bin/ruby -v -Ilib bug4.rb
#
# ruby 1.9.3dev (2011-07-05 trunk 32413) [x86_64-darwin10.8.0]
# not happy!
#
# RESULT = 256
#
# VERSION = 1.8.7-p330
# CMD     = ~/.multiruby/install/1.8.7-p330/bin/ruby -v -Ilib bug4.rb
#
# ruby 1.8.7 (2010-12-23 patchlevel 330) [i686-darwin10.5.0]
#
# RESULT = 0
#
# VERSION = 1.9.2-p136
# CMD     = ~/.multiruby/install/1.9.2-p136/bin/ruby -v -Ilib bug4.rb
#
# ruby 1.9.2p136 (2010-12-25 revision 30365) [x86_64-darwin10.5.0]
#
# RESULT = 0
#
# TOTAL RESULT = 1 failures out of 3



-- 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next