[#38647] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5130][Open] Thread.pass sticks on OpenBSD — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
16 messages
2011/08/01
[#38653] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5135][Open] Ruby 1.9.3-preview1 tests fails in Fedora Rawhide — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
31 messages
2011/08/01
[#38776] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5135] Ruby 1.9.3-preview1 tests fails in Fedora Rawhide
— Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2011/08/04
[#38777] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5135] Ruby 1.9.3-preview1 tests fails in Fedora Rawhide
— Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2011/08/04
[#38778] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5135] Ruby 1.9.3-preview1 tests fails in Fedora Rawhide
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/08/04
2011/8/4 Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@tiscali.cz>:
[#38666] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
61 messages
2011/08/01
[#38667] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
— Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
2011/08/01
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 07:35:15AM +0900, Yehuda Katz wrote:
[#38669] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2011/08/01
(08/02/2011 07:46 AM), Aaron Patterson wrote:
[#38671] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/08/01
Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#38674] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2011/08/01
(08/02/2011 08:14 AM), Eric Wong wrote:
[#38675] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/08/01
Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#38676] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2011/08/01
(08/02/2011 08:35 AM), Eric Wong wrote:
[#38677] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/08/01
Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#38692] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2011/08/02
2011/8/2 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
[#38771] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/08/04
2011/8/2 Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org>:
[#38670] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/08/01
Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com> wrote:
[#38672] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
— Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
2011/08/01
Yehuda Katz
[#41165] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2011/11/20
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 07:35:15AM +0900, Yehuda Katz wrote:
[#38745] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2011/08/03
2011/8/2 Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>:
[#40821] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/11/07
Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com> wrote:
[#55884] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5138] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
— "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
2013/07/09
[#55890] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5138] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2013/07/10
"tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@tenderlovemaking.com> wrote:
[#55892] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5138] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2013/07/10
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 09:03:19AM +0900, Eric Wong wrote:
[#55895] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5138] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2013/07/10
Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#55954] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5138] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2013/07/11
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:52:26AM +0900, Eric Wong wrote:
[#38695] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5144][Open] Remove GPL file from repository — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
17 messages
2011/08/02
[#38709] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5144] Remove GPL file from repository
— Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
2011/08/02
[#38711] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5144] Remove GPL file from repository
— Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
2011/08/02
[#38712] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5144] Remove GPL file from repository
— Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
2011/08/02
[#38729] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5144] Remove GPL file from repository
— Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...>
2011/08/02
[#38746] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5144] Remove GPL file from repository
— Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
2011/08/03
[#38713] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5144] Remove GPL file from repository
— Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
2011/08/02
[#38715] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5144] Remove GPL file from repository
— Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
2011/08/02
[#38706] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5147][Open] mkmf should not require static library when ruby is built with --enable-shared — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
9 messages
2011/08/02
[#38802] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5147] mkmf should not require static library when ruby is built with --enable-shared
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/08/04
[#38903] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5147] mkmf should not require static library when ruby is built with --enable-shared
— Naohisa Goto <ngotogenome@...>
2011/08/10
[#38831] Help out with the next version of ruby-lang.org — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
https://github.com/rubylang/ruby-lang.org
5 messages
2011/08/07
[#38832] Re: Help out with the next version of ruby-lang.org
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2011/08/07
Great news! Congratulations for the initiative!
[#38839] Re: Help out with the next version of ruby-lang.org
— Vít Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2011/08/07
Just wondering why is it not under https://github.com/ruby account,
[#38866] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5173][Open] [PATCH] json/generator: prevent GC of temporary strings — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
4 messages
2011/08/09
[#38881] Init_prelude gone in 1.9.3 — Christoph Kappel <unexist@...>
Dear list,
6 messages
2011/08/09
[#38894] Why Ruby has versioned paths? — V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
Hello, could somebody please elaborate about reasons why Ruby uses versioned
9 messages
2011/08/10
[#38895] Re: Why Ruby has versioned paths?
— Michael Klishin <michael.s.klishin@...>
2011/08/10
2011/8/10 V鱈t Ondruch <v.ondruch@gmail.com>
[#38896] Re: Why Ruby has versioned paths?
— V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2011/08/10
2011/8/10 Michael Klishin <michael.s.klishin@gmail.com>
[#38897] Re: Why Ruby has versioned paths?
— Michael Klishin <michael.s.klishin@...>
2011/08/10
2011/8/10 V鱈t Ondruch <v.ondruch@gmail.com>
[#38911] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5183][Open] [PATCH] openssl: add OP_NO_COMPRESSION constant — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
3 messages
2011/08/10
[#38972] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5193][Open] ruby_thread_data_type linker errors fixed with RUBY_EXTERN — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
28 messages
2011/08/16
[#38980] :symbol.is_a?(String) — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
http://viewsourcecode.org/why/redhanded/inspect/SymbolIs_aString.html
8 messages
2011/08/16
[#38982] Re: :symbol.is_a?(String)
— "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...>
2011/08/16
What would ObjectSpace.each_object(String) { |o| p o } produce?
[#38983] Re: :symbol.is_a?(String)
— Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
2011/08/16
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 17:01, Haase, Konstantin
[#38985] Re: :symbol.is_a?(String)
— "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...>
2011/08/16
This would only be feasible if frozen strings would truly be frozen. Currently, there are a lot of C extensions modifying frozen strings (which is why Rubinius and JRuby have to treat frozen strings as mutable). Unfortunately, the current C API gives access to the raw character array, making it impossible to prevent frozen strings from being modified. What if a cached, frozen string is modified? Also, I see it as a feature of symbols that they are not encoding aware.
[#39000] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5199][Open] ext/tk: RB_GC_GUARD seems to be needed in several places — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
9 messages
2011/08/17
[#39022] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5204][Open] `defined?(@@foo) && @foo` may fail — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
5 messages
2011/08/19
[#39025] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5206][Open] ruby -K should warn — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
14 messages
2011/08/19
[#39062] Releasing r33028 as Ruby 1.9.3 RC1 — Yugui <yugui@...>
Hi,
17 messages
2011/08/23
[#39230] Re: Releasing r33028 as Ruby 1.9.3 RC1
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2011/09/02
Hi,
[#39242] Re: Releasing r33028 as Ruby 1.9.3 RC1
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/09/03
Hi
[#39250] Re: Releasing r33028 as Ruby 1.9.3 RC1
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/09/03
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 12:14 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
[#39257] Re: Releasing r33028 as Ruby 1.9.3 RC1
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/09/04
> We are still suffering from a sample/test.rb failure for system(),
[#39079] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5221][Open] LoadEerror#path — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...>
10 messages
2011/08/24
[#39093] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5227][Open] Float#round fails on corner cases — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
14 messages
2011/08/24
[#39115] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5227][Assigned] Float#round fails on corner cases
— Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
2011/08/26
[#39126] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5227][Assigned] Float#round fails on corner cases
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
2011/08/26
Hi
[#39138] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5227][Assigned] Float#round fails on corner cases
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/08/27
(2011/08/27 4:40), Marc-Andre Lafortune wrote:
[#39167] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5227][Assigned] Float#round fails on corner cases
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
2011/08/28
Hi,
[#39169] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5227][Assigned] Float#round fails on corner cases
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/08/29
2011/8/29 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca>:
[#39205] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5227][Assigned] Float#round fails on corner cases
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
2011/08/31
Hi,
[#39118] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #921] autoload is not thread-safe — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...>
3 messages
2011/08/26
[#39120] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5233][Open] OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket has problems with encodings other than "ascii" — Niklas Baumstark <niklas.baumstark@...>
9 messages
2011/08/26
[#39134] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5237][Open] IO.copy_stream calls #read on an object infinitely many times — Brian Ford <brixen@...>
7 messages
2011/08/27
[#39140] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5237] IO.copy_stream calls #read on an object infinitely many times
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/08/27
[#39145] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5237] IO.copy_stream calls #read on an object infinitely many times
— brian ford <brixen@...>
2011/08/27
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#39142] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5239][Open] bootstraptest/runner.rb: assert_normal_exit logic broken on Debian/GNU kFreeBSD — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>
11 messages
2011/08/27
[#39144] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5239][Assigned] bootstraptest/runner.rb: assert_normal_exit logic broken on Debian/GNU kFreeBSD
— Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/08/27
[#39164] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5239] bootstraptest/runner.rb: assert_normal_exit logic broken on Debian/GNU kFreeBSD
— Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>
2011/08/28
[#39174] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5239] bootstraptest/runner.rb: assert_normal_exit logic broken on Debian/GNU kFreeBSD
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/08/29
> I've just checked, and FreeBSD 8.2 is also affected by this issue.
[#39175] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5239] bootstraptest/runner.rb: assert_normal_exit logic broken on Debian/GNU kFreeBSD
— Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>
2011/08/29
On 29/08/11 at 12:43 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
[#39146] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5240][Open] Hang when using threads + forks on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>
9 messages
2011/08/27
[#39162] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5244][Open] Continuation causes Bus Error on Debian sparc — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>
29 messages
2011/08/28
[#39184] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #1792][Closed] Fixnum#& 等が、Rational などを受けつける — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>
4 messages
2011/08/29
[#39491] Re: [ruby-core:39184] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #1792][Closed] Fixnum#& 等が、Rational などを受けつける
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2011/09/12
Is it intentional?
[#39195] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5251][Open] Thread Change Breaks Windows Builds — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
4 messages
2011/08/30
[#39216] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5253][Open] PTY with wait incorrectly sets exit status for exit command — Simon Chiang <simon.a.chiang@...>
4 messages
2011/08/31
[ruby-core:38730] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5144] Remove GPL file from repository
From:
Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
Date:
2011-08-03 00:30:22 UTC
List:
ruby-core #38730
2011/8/3 Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>: > I think *you* are blamed. You see the GPL file is confusing and that's because you are ignorant, he says. Sorry. I want you to clarify the license because I'm ignorant. I'm suggesting just renaming or moving, not removing the GPL file. Is it unacceptable? I also want you to confirm my understanding is correct. Ruby still has some codes licensed under dual license of Artistic or GPL (a part (for windows) of util.c, win32/win32.c, and ext/win32ole/win32ole.c), and they are actually mixed in the binary, at least, for windows. So A windows binary of Ruby must be distributed under GPL unless we choose Artistic License. Right? Must a binary for other platforms be distributed under GPL in the same condition? Isn't it better that the part of util.c under GPL should be separated into the other file? -- Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp>