[#55794] how to run ruby tests (backporting fix for cve-2013-4073) — Jordi Massaguer Pla <jmassaguerpla@...>
Hi ruby core developers,
4 messages
2013/07/04
[#55799] Re: how to run ruby tests (backporting fix for cve-2013-4073)
— V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2013/07/04
Dne 4.7.2013 13:19, Jordi Massaguer Pla napsal(a):
[#55853] ruby 1.9.3 p448 breaks ABI — V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
Hi,
13 messages
2013/07/08
[#55854] Re: ruby 1.9.3 p448 breaks ABI
— Yorick Peterse <yorickpeterse@...>
2013/07/08
Out of curiosity, does this tool take into account deprecated/internal
[#55860] Re: ruby 1.9.3 p448 breaks ABI
— V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2013/07/08
Dne 8.7.2013 17:03, Yorick Peterse napsal(a):
[#55861] Re: ruby 1.9.3 p448 breaks ABI
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2013/07/08
(7/8/13 5:36 PM), V咜 Ondruch wrote:
[#55864] Re: ruby 1.9.3 p448 breaks ABI
— Jon <jon.forums@...>
2013/07/08
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 06:50:16 +0900
[#55886] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8616][Open] Process.daemon messes up threads — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
10 messages
2013/07/09
[#55976] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8629][Open] Method#parameters should include the default value — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
13 messages
2013/07/12
[#56258] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8629] Method#parameters should include the default value
— "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
2013/07/29
[#55984] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8630][Open] Transcoding high-bit bytes from ASCII-8BIT to a text encoding should be :invalid, not :undef — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
5 messages
2013/07/12
[#55986] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #8630][Open] Transcoding high-bit bytes from ASCII-8BIT to a text encoding should be :invalid, not :undef
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/07/12
2013/7/13 headius (Charles Nutter) <headius@headius.com>:
[#55988] Next developer's meeting — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2013/07/13
[#56001] [CommonRuby - Feature #8635][Open] attr_accessor with default block — "judofyr (Magnus Holm)" <judofyr@...>
5 messages
2013/07/14
[#56004] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8636][Open] Documentation hosting on ruby-lang.org — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <e@...>
18 messages
2013/07/15
[#56005] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8637][Open] I18n documentation — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <e@...>
5 messages
2013/07/15
[#56010] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8637] I18n documentation
— "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <e@...>
2013/07/15
[#56011] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8637] I18n documentation
— "kou (Kouhei Sutou)" <kou@...>
2013/07/15
[#56019] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8639][Open] Add Queue#each — "avdi (Avdi Grimm)" <avdi@...>
15 messages
2013/07/15
[#56020] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8639] Add Queue#each
— "rkh (Konstantin Haase)" <me@...>
2013/07/15
[#56029] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8639][Open] Add Queue#each
— Alex Young <alex@...>
2013/07/15
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 00:44 +0900, avdi (Avdi Grimm) wrote:
[#56027] [CommonRuby - Feature #8640][Open] Add Time#elapsed to return nanoseconds since creation — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
24 messages
2013/07/15
[#56068] [CommonRuby - Feature #8640] Add Time#elapsed to return nanoseconds since creation
— "phluid61 (Matthew Kerwin)" <matthew@...>
2013/07/17
[#56070] Re: [CommonRuby - Feature #8640] Add Time#elapsed to return nanoseconds since creation
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2013/07/18
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 07:59:34AM +0900, phluid61 (Matthew Kerwin) wrote:
[#56037] [CommonRuby - Feature #8640] Add Time#elapsed to return nanoseconds since creation
— duerst (Martin Dürst) <duerst@...>
2013/07/16
[#56041] [CommonRuby - Feature #8643][Open] Add Binding.from_hash — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
26 messages
2013/07/16
[#56087] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8658][Open] Process.clock_gettime — "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...>
23 messages
2013/07/19
[#56092] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8658] Process.clock_gettime
— "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...>
2013/07/20
[#56132] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8658] Process.clock_gettime
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2013/07/23
(7/20/13 6:39 AM), akr (Akira Tanaka) wrote:
[#56135] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8658] Process.clock_gettime
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/07/24
2013/7/24 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>:
[#56096] [CommonRuby - Feature #8661][Open] Add option to print backstrace in reverse order(stack frames first & error last) — "gary4gar (Gaurish Sharma)" <gary4gar@...>
18 messages
2013/07/20
[#56103] Ruby Developer Meeting Japan 2013-07-27 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
Hi,
6 messages
2013/07/21
[#56228] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8697][Open] Fixnum complement operator issue — "torimus (Torimus GL)" <torimus.gl@...>
8 messages
2013/07/27
[#56247] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8700][Open] Integer#bitsize (actually Fixnum#bitsize and Bignum#bitsize) — "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...>
8 messages
2013/07/28
[#56270] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8707][Open] Hash#reverse_each — "Glass_saga (Masaki Matsushita)" <glass.saga@...>
8 messages
2013/07/30
[#56276] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8707][Feedback] Hash#reverse_each
— "matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)" <matz@...>
2013/07/31
[ruby-core:55884] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5138] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
From:
"tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
Date:
2013-07-09 21:24:11 UTC
List:
ruby-core #55884
Issue #5138 has been updated by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson).
File nonblock_no_tuple.patch added
File nonblock_tuple.patch added
=begin
Hi, I've updated the patch to apply against trunk (please find it attached).
Matz, akr, with regard to get_* vs try_read_*, I don't think it will work. For example, should try_write_* be set_*? I think it would look strange to say "io.set_nonblock(bytes)". We also have `sysread_nonblock`, should that be `sysget_nonblock`? Changing the method names is fine, but I don't think "get/set" pair works well.
As for Erlang style return values. It seems interesting, but that means every call to `try_read_nonblock` would allocate an array. The only possible return values would be:
[bytes, nil] # successful read
[nil, nil] # EOF
[nil, :wait_readable]
[nil, :wait_writable]
In this case it seems easier if we stick with one return value rather than two. I really want this feature, so I've also prepared a patch with the "tuple" solution (please find it attached).
In order to demonstrate a usecase, we can take rbuf_fill from net/http as an example. Please find the current method definition here:
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/07dc8257039f69b41cca50ff49ce738d3df7b362/lib/net/protocol.rb#L151-L169
Here is what it would look like with the tuple method:
def rbuf_fill
loop do
chunk, err = @io.try_read_nonblock(BUFSIZE)
case err
when :wait_readable
unless IO.select([@io], nil, nil, @read_timeout)
raise Net::ReadTimeout
end
when :wait_writable
# OpenSSL::Buffering#read_nonblock may fail with IO::WaitWritable.
# http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#PROG10
unless IO.select(nil, [@io], nil, @read_timeout)
raise Net::ReadTimeout
end
else
raise EOFError unless chunk
@rbuf << chunk
break
end
end
end
Here is what it looks like with just a single return value:
def rbuf_fill
loop do
chunk = @io.try_read_nonblock(BUFSIZE)
case chunk
when :wait_readable
unless IO.select([@io], nil, nil, @read_timeout)
raise Net::ReadTimeout
end
when :wait_writable
# OpenSSL::Buffering#read_nonblock may fail with IO::WaitWritable.
# http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#PROG10
unless IO.select(nil, [@io], nil, @read_timeout)
raise Net::ReadTimeout
end
when nil then raise EOFError
else
@rbuf << chunk
break
end
end
end
We can express nonblocking reads with `loop` rather than using begin/end + an exception and retry as the loop construct.
=end
----------------------------------------
Feature #5138: Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/5138#change-40383
Author: wycats (Yehuda Katz)
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Category: core
Target version: next minor
The current Ruby I/O classes have non-blocking methods (read_nonblock and write_nonblock). These methods will never block, and if they would block, they raise an exception instead (IO::WaitReadable or IO::WaitWritable). In addition, if the IO is at EOF, they raise an EOFError.
These exceptions are raised repeatedly in virtually every use of the non-blocking methods. This patch adds a pair of methods (try_read_nonblock and try_write_nonblock) that have the same semantics as the existing methods, but they return Symbols instead of raising exceptions for these routine cases:
* :read_would_block
* :write_would_block
* :eof
The patch contains updates for IO, StringIO, and OpenSSL. The updates are fully documented and tested.
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/