From: "nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)" <nobu@...>
Date: 2013-07-04T23:43:17+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:55796] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8593] MKMF have_framework check assumes the framework and header are identically named


Issue #8593 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada).


-framework option implies -l option, does the library name differ from its framework name?
----------------------------------------
Bug #8593: MKMF have_framework check assumes the framework and header are identically named
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8593#change-40291

Author: karljs (Karl Smeltzer)
Status: Feedback
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: 
Target version: 
ruby -v: ruby 2.0.0p247 (2013-06-27 revision 41674) [x86_64-darwin12]
Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: UNKNOWN


I am working on a Ruby extension in which the C code links against SDL2.0 on OSX.  This is distributed as an OSX framework (SDL2.framework directory) but the primary header file is simply SDL.h and not SDL2.h

When I add have_framework('SDL2') to my extconf.rb file, it fails the check because it only tests for SDL2/SDL2.h

If I create a symlink named SDL2.h in the same directory, then the check passes and everything builds correctly.


-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/