From: "kou (Kouhei Sutou)" Date: 2013-10-08T00:10:25+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:57702] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8636] Documentation hosting on ruby-lang.org Issue #8636 has been updated by kou (Kouhei Sutou). zzak (Zachary Scott) wrote: > We are also working on i18n support for RDoc so the japanese documentation team will not have to maintain a separate repository. Eventually with this supported, we can move to docs.ruby-lang.org/LANG Reference: https://github.com/rdoc/rdoc/pull/254 > For now, I think we should just have docs.ruby-lang.org be the english documentation site. However, I'd like more feedback from the RUREMA team. Could you ping okkez and sutou-san? Does it mean that you put http://docs.ruby-lang.org/ to English documentation? Or http://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/? http://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/ is OK to me. Ah, I have one more question. How do you think about multi-version hosting? doc.ruby-lang.org/ hosts only the latest stable version? Or it hosts all available versions? I think that it is better the latter because there are many old stable (1.9.x) users. (I will write a documentation full-text search Web service for RDoc after RDoc supports i18n.) ---------------------------------------- Feature #8636: Documentation hosting on ruby-lang.org https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8636#change-42314 Author: zzak (Zachary Scott) Status: Feedback Priority: Normal Assignee: zzak (Zachary Scott) Category: doc Target version: We discussed whether RDoc documentation should be hosted on ruby-lang.org. What domain should we use to host api documentation for Ruby? ie: (docs|rdoc|ref).ruby-lang.org IRC Developers Meeting Log: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby/wiki/DevelopersMeeting20130712#Documentation-hosted-on-ruby-langorg-zzak I am partial to docs.ruby-lang.org, but open to feedback ofcourse. -- http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/