[#62904] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9894] [Open] [RFC] README.EXT: document rb_gc_register_mark_object — normalperson@...
Issue #9894 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/06/02
[#63321] [ANN] ElixirConf 2014 - Don't Miss Jos辿 Valim and Dave Thomas — Jim Freeze <jimfreeze@...>
Just a few more weeks until ElixirConf 2014!
6 messages
2014/06/24
[#63391] Access Modifiers (Internal Interfaces) — Daniel da Silva Ferreira <danieldasilvaferreira@...>
Hi,
3 messages
2014/06/28
[ruby-core:62971] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8625] [Assigned] IO#read(len, buf) shortens buf even if data is not read actually
From:
usa@...
Date:
2014-06-07 01:49:52 UTC
List:
ruby-core #62971
Issue #8625 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
Status changed from Closed to Assigned
Assignee changed from Masaki Matsushita to Nobuyoshi Nakada
r46360 breaks some tests on mswin.
----------------------------------------
Bug #8625: IO#read(len, buf) shortens buf even if data is not read actually
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8625#change-47066
* Author: Nobuhiro IMAI
* Status: Assigned
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Nobuyoshi Nakada
* Category: core
* Target version:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.1.0dev (2013-07-11 trunk 41923) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: REQUIRED
----------------------------------------
By r34580, `IO#read(len, buf)` does not expand _buf_ until data is read actually,
but it still shortens if the original _buf_ size is greater than _len_.
Is this an intended behavior?
~~~ruby
def m(s)
IO.pipe do |r, w|
t = Thread.new{r.read(2, s)}
Thread.pass until t.stop?
t.kill
t.value
end
end
(1..3).each do |len|
s = "x" * len
s # => "x", "xx", "xxx"
m(s)
s # => "x", "xx", "xx"
end
~~~
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/