[#27380] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Dan Peterson <redmine@...>

Bug #2553: Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls

21 messages 2010/01/03

[#27437] [Feature #2561] 1.8.7 Patch reduces time cost of Rational operations by 50%. — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...>

Feature #2561: 1.8.7 Patch reduces time cost of Rational operations by 50%.

9 messages 2010/01/06

[#27447] [Bug #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Aliaksey Kandratsenka <redmine@...>

Bug #2564: [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork

18 messages 2010/01/06

[#27545] [Feature #2594] 1.8.7 Patch: Reduce time spent in gc.c is_pointer_to_heap(). — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...>

Feature #2594: 1.8.7 Patch: Reduce time spent in gc.c is_pointer_to_heap().

8 messages 2010/01/11

[#27635] [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #2619: Proposed method: Process.fork_supported?

45 messages 2010/01/20
[#27643] [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/01/21

Issue #2619 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#27678] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/22

Hi,

[#27684] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/01/22

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#27708] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/22

Hi,

[#27646] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/21

2010/1/21 Hongli Lai <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:

[#27652] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2010/01/21

On 1/21/10 5:20 AM, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#27653] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/21

2010/1/21 Hongli Lai <hongli@plan99.net>:

[#27662] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Vladimir Sizikov <vsizikov@...> 2010/01/21

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:

[#27698] [Bug #2629] ConditionVariable#wait(mutex, timeout) should return whether the condition was signalled, not the waited time — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #2629: ConditionVariable#wait(mutex, timeout) should return whether the condition was signalled, not the waited time

8 messages 2010/01/22

[#27722] [Feature #2635] Unbundle rdoc — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Feature #2635: Unbundle rdoc

14 messages 2010/01/23

[#27757] [Bug #2638] ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located. — Joel Soete <redmine@...>

Bug #2638: ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located.

10 messages 2010/01/24

[#27778] [Bug #2641] Seg fault running miniruby during ruby build on Haiku — Alexander von Gluck <redmine@...>

Bug #2641: Seg fault running miniruby during ruby build on Haiku

10 messages 2010/01/25

[#27791] [Bug #2644] memory over-allocation with regexp — Greg Hazel <redmine@...>

Bug #2644: memory over-allocation with regexp

12 messages 2010/01/25

[#27794] [Bug #2647] Lack of testing for String#split — Hugh Sasse <redmine@...>

Bug #2647: Lack of testing for String#split

14 messages 2010/01/25

[#27912] [Bug #2669] mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2669: mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files

11 messages 2010/01/27

[#27930] [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>

Hi jeg2, or anyone who knows the implementation of FasterCSV,

15 messages 2010/01/28
[#27931] Re: [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2010/01/28

On Jan 28, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:

[ruby-core:27954] [Bug #2667] Segmentation fault error

From: Adam Jay <redmine@...>
Date: 2010-01-29 13:06:30 UTC
List: ruby-core #27954
Issue #2667 has been updated by Adam Jay.


After I opened this ticket I did a 'make install' again and it worked. It also worked all day yesterday (2 days), this morning, I got the segmentation fault again

$ irb
<internal:gem_prelude>: compile/should not be reached: compile.c:473
/usr/bin/ruby:10808: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.9.1p376 (2009-12-07 revision 26041) [x86_64-linux]

-- control frame ----------
c:0002 p:-4895604 s:0004 b:0004 l:000003 d:000003 TOP    /usr/bin/ruby:10808
c:0001 p:0000 s:0002 b:0002 l:001e98 d:001e98 TOP   
---------------------------
-- Ruby level backtrace information-----------------------------------------

-- C level backtrace information -------------------------------------------
0x4d86a1 /usr/bin/ruby(rb_vm_bugreport+0x41) [0x4d86a1]
0x503c5e /usr/bin/ruby [0x503c5e]
0x503dc1 /usr/bin/ruby(rb_bug+0xb1) [0x503dc1]
0x48c3cf /usr/bin/ruby [0x48c3cf]
0x36ab20e930 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 [0x36ab20e930]
0x4b97d5 /usr/bin/ruby [0x4b97d5]
0x4bb083 /usr/bin/ruby [0x4bb083]
0x4bd292 /usr/bin/ruby [0x4bd292]
0x4bb478 /usr/bin/ruby [0x4bb478]
0x4c3823 /usr/bin/ruby(rb_iseq_compile_node+0x6f3) [0x4c3823]
0x4c711c /usr/bin/ruby [0x4c711c]
0x4c718b /usr/bin/ruby(rb_iseq_new_with_opt+0x1b) [0x4c718b]
0x4bb00b /usr/bin/ruby [0x4bb00b]
0x4bd975 /usr/bin/ruby [0x4bd975]
0x4bb478 /usr/bin/ruby [0x4bb478]
0x4bbc49 /usr/bin/ruby [0x4bbc49]
0x4bb478 /usr/bin/ruby [0x4bb478]
0x4c3599 /usr/bin/ruby(rb_iseq_compile_node+0x469) [0x4c3599]
0x4c711c /usr/bin/ruby [0x4c711c]
0x4c718b /usr/bin/ruby(rb_iseq_new_with_opt+0x1b) [0x4c718b]
0x4c798d /usr/bin/ruby(rb_iseq_compile_with_option+0x13d) [0x4c798d]
0x4df314 /usr/bin/ruby(Init_prelude+0xa4) [0x4df314]
0x48b515 /usr/bin/ruby [0x48b515]
0x4cb19a /usr/bin/ruby(rb_vm_call_cfunc+0xba) [0x4cb19a]
0x489884 /usr/bin/ruby(ruby_process_options+0xa4) [0x489884]
0x4177a0 /usr/bin/ruby(ruby_options+0x90) [0x4177a0]
0x4156c5 /usr/bin/ruby(main+0x45) [0x4156c5]
0x36aa61d994 /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4) [0x36aa61d994]
0x4155c9 /usr/bin/ruby [0x4155c9]

[NOTE]
You may encounter a bug of Ruby interpreter. Bug reports are welcome.
For details: http://www.ruby-lang.org/bugreport.html


Also to answer your other question, this machine is replacing an existing server which originally had it installed in /usr/bin, which is why its installed there.

If you need any other information from me, let me know.
----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2667

----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread