[#27380] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Dan Peterson <redmine@...>

Bug #2553: Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls

21 messages 2010/01/03

[#27437] [Feature #2561] 1.8.7 Patch reduces time cost of Rational operations by 50%. — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...>

Feature #2561: 1.8.7 Patch reduces time cost of Rational operations by 50%.

9 messages 2010/01/06

[#27447] [Bug #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Aliaksey Kandratsenka <redmine@...>

Bug #2564: [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork

18 messages 2010/01/06

[#27545] [Feature #2594] 1.8.7 Patch: Reduce time spent in gc.c is_pointer_to_heap(). — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...>

Feature #2594: 1.8.7 Patch: Reduce time spent in gc.c is_pointer_to_heap().

8 messages 2010/01/11

[#27635] [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #2619: Proposed method: Process.fork_supported?

45 messages 2010/01/20
[#27643] [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/01/21

Issue #2619 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#27678] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/22

Hi,

[#27684] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/01/22

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#27708] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/22

Hi,

[#27646] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/21

2010/1/21 Hongli Lai <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:

[#27652] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2010/01/21

On 1/21/10 5:20 AM, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#27653] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/21

2010/1/21 Hongli Lai <hongli@plan99.net>:

[#27662] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Vladimir Sizikov <vsizikov@...> 2010/01/21

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:

[#27698] [Bug #2629] ConditionVariable#wait(mutex, timeout) should return whether the condition was signalled, not the waited time — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #2629: ConditionVariable#wait(mutex, timeout) should return whether the condition was signalled, not the waited time

8 messages 2010/01/22

[#27722] [Feature #2635] Unbundle rdoc — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Feature #2635: Unbundle rdoc

14 messages 2010/01/23

[#27757] [Bug #2638] ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located. — Joel Soete <redmine@...>

Bug #2638: ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located.

10 messages 2010/01/24

[#27778] [Bug #2641] Seg fault running miniruby during ruby build on Haiku — Alexander von Gluck <redmine@...>

Bug #2641: Seg fault running miniruby during ruby build on Haiku

10 messages 2010/01/25

[#27791] [Bug #2644] memory over-allocation with regexp — Greg Hazel <redmine@...>

Bug #2644: memory over-allocation with regexp

12 messages 2010/01/25

[#27794] [Bug #2647] Lack of testing for String#split — Hugh Sasse <redmine@...>

Bug #2647: Lack of testing for String#split

14 messages 2010/01/25

[#27912] [Bug #2669] mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2669: mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files

11 messages 2010/01/27

[#27930] [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>

Hi jeg2, or anyone who knows the implementation of FasterCSV,

15 messages 2010/01/28
[#27931] Re: [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2010/01/28

On Jan 28, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:

[ruby-core:27847] [Bug #2638] ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located.

From: Joel Soete <redmine@...>
Date: 2010-01-26 09:05:28 UTC
List: ruby-core #27847
Issue #2638 has been updated by Joel Soete.


Hello Sir,

Please accept my apology, I am always trying to be more accurate in my pr report but here I was a bit disturbe.

So here is my configure options:
./configure \
            --prefix=/opt/${Co}pware \
            --program-suffix=1.9 \
            --libexecdir="\${prefix}/lib/ruby1.9" \
            --mandir=/opt/${Co}pware/man \
            --infodir=/opt/${Co}pware/info \
            --enable-shared

(with variable Co="mce-" as you certainly guess)

That said, # gcc -print-libgcc-file-name
/opt/freeware/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/4.2.0/libgcc.a

returns well the full path of libgcc.a but my libgcc_s.a is in the same dir:

# ll /opt/freeware/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/4.2.0/
total 7616
drwxr-xr-x    6 root     system         4096 Aug 07 06:49 .
drwxr-xr-x    3 root     system          256 Mar 25 2008  ..
drwxr-xr-x    7 root     system         4096 Aug 07 06:47 include
drwxr-xr-x    3 root     system          256 Jul 31 07:11 install-tools
-rw-r--r--    1 root     system       124713 Mar 25 2008  libgcc.a
-rw-r--r--    1 root     system        45584 Mar 25 2008  libgcc_eh.a
-rw-r--r--    1 root     system       125986 Feb 18 2008  libgcc_s.a
-rw-r--r--    1 root     system        27086 Mar 25 2008  libgcov.a
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     system      3376733 Mar 25 2008  libstdc++.a
-rw-r--r--    1 root     system       178720 Mar 25 2008  libsupc++.a
drwxr-xr-x    2 root     system          256 Aug 07 06:49 ppc64
drwxr-xr-x    3 root     system          256 Aug 07 06:49 pthread

Well it would be more clean to run full 'make test' but after the installation some samples seems to work fine:
# ruby1.9 ./sample/fib.rb 
6765

# ruby1.9 ./test/test_timeout.rb
Loaded suite ./test/test_timeout
Started
.
Finished in 0.134635 seconds.

# ruby1.9 ./test/ruby/test_thread.rb
Loaded suite ./test/ruby/test_thread
Started
...............................
Finished in 21.258614 seconds.

31 tests, 101 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips

1 tests, 1 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips

Anyway, I already see 2 issues:
    - I don't now if it wouldn't be better to use the 'pthread' version of libgcc_s
      (/opt/freeware/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/4.2.0/pthread)?
    - how would I manage a 64bit build:
        * normaly I would simply use -m64 gcc compile option to do so;
        * but "# gcc -m64 -print-libgcc-file-name" always return same result and not
          /opt/freeware/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/4.2.0/ppc64?

Thanks a lot for your attention,
    J.

----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2638

----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread