[#27380] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Dan Peterson <redmine@...>

Bug #2553: Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls

21 messages 2010/01/03

[#27437] [Feature #2561] 1.8.7 Patch reduces time cost of Rational operations by 50%. — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...>

Feature #2561: 1.8.7 Patch reduces time cost of Rational operations by 50%.

9 messages 2010/01/06

[#27447] [Bug #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Aliaksey Kandratsenka <redmine@...>

Bug #2564: [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork

18 messages 2010/01/06

[#27545] [Feature #2594] 1.8.7 Patch: Reduce time spent in gc.c is_pointer_to_heap(). — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...>

Feature #2594: 1.8.7 Patch: Reduce time spent in gc.c is_pointer_to_heap().

8 messages 2010/01/11

[#27635] [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #2619: Proposed method: Process.fork_supported?

45 messages 2010/01/20
[#27643] [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/01/21

Issue #2619 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#27678] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/22

Hi,

[#27684] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/01/22

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#27708] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/22

Hi,

[#27646] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/21

2010/1/21 Hongli Lai <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:

[#27652] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2010/01/21

On 1/21/10 5:20 AM, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#27653] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/21

2010/1/21 Hongli Lai <hongli@plan99.net>:

[#27662] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Vladimir Sizikov <vsizikov@...> 2010/01/21

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:

[#27698] [Bug #2629] ConditionVariable#wait(mutex, timeout) should return whether the condition was signalled, not the waited time — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #2629: ConditionVariable#wait(mutex, timeout) should return whether the condition was signalled, not the waited time

8 messages 2010/01/22

[#27722] [Feature #2635] Unbundle rdoc — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Feature #2635: Unbundle rdoc

14 messages 2010/01/23

[#27757] [Bug #2638] ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located. — Joel Soete <redmine@...>

Bug #2638: ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located.

10 messages 2010/01/24

[#27778] [Bug #2641] Seg fault running miniruby during ruby build on Haiku — Alexander von Gluck <redmine@...>

Bug #2641: Seg fault running miniruby during ruby build on Haiku

10 messages 2010/01/25

[#27791] [Bug #2644] memory over-allocation with regexp — Greg Hazel <redmine@...>

Bug #2644: memory over-allocation with regexp

12 messages 2010/01/25

[#27794] [Bug #2647] Lack of testing for String#split — Hugh Sasse <redmine@...>

Bug #2647: Lack of testing for String#split

14 messages 2010/01/25

[#27912] [Bug #2669] mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2669: mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files

11 messages 2010/01/27

[#27930] [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>

Hi jeg2, or anyone who knows the implementation of FasterCSV,

15 messages 2010/01/28
[#27931] Re: [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2010/01/28

On Jan 28, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:

[ruby-core:27634] [Bug #2618] Win32OLE RuntimeError due CoInitialize not being called

From: Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Date: 2010-01-20 14:34:22 UTC
List: ruby-core #27634
Bug #2618: Win32OLE RuntimeError due CoInitialize not being called
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2618

Author: Luis Lavena
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
Category: ext, Target version: 1.9.x
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.1p376 (2009-12-07 revision 26041) [i386-mingw32]

A user reported to Ruby-Talk and RubyInstaller mailing list some issues using ruby 1.9.1p243 (2009-07-16 revision 24175) [i386-mingw32] 

http://groups.google.com/group/rubyinstaller/browse_thread/thread/e5e47aabf09aff98

I could reproduce the issue across multiple versions of 1.9.1 and with close-up-to-date version of 1.9.2dev:

http://groups.google.com/group/rubyinstaller/msg/dae727305e57ba6d

Simple test script:
http://pastie.org/786354

<pre><code>
require 'win32ole'

t = Thread.new do
  begin
    ie = WIN32OLE.new( "InternetExplorer.Application" )
    ie.visible = true
    ie.navigate( "http://google.com" )
    puts "OK"
  rescue Exception => e
    puts e.class
    puts e
    puts e.backtrace
  end
end

t.join
</code></pre>

Generates this:

<pre>
ruby 1.9.1p376 (2009-12-07 revision 26041) [i386-mingw32] 

WIN32OLERuntimeError 
failed to create WIN32OLE object from `InternetExplorer.Application' 
    HRESULT error code:0x800401f0 
      CoInitialize has not been called. 
t.rb:5:in `initialize' 
t.rb:5:in `new' 
t.rb:5:in `block in <main>' 

ruby 1.9.1p376 (2009-12-07 revision 26041) [i386-mswin32] 

WIN32OLERuntimeError 
failed to create WIN32OLE object from `InternetExplorer.Application' 
    HRESULT error code:0x800401f0 
      CoInitialize has not been called. 
t.rb:5:in `initialize' 
t.rb:5:in `new' 
t.rb:5:in `block in <main>' 

ruby 1.9.2dev (2010-01-02 trunk 26229) [i386-mingw32] 

WIN32OLERuntimeError 
failed to create WIN32OLE object from `InternetExplorer.Application' 
    HRESULT error code:0x800401f0 
      CoInitialize has not been called. 
t.rb:5:in `initialize' 
t.rb:5:in `new' 
t.rb:5:in `block in <main>' 
</pre>

Both mswin32 and mingw32 generates the same issue.


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next