ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#27366] [Bug #2545] Array#delete_if is borked if user calls 'break' — Brian Candler <redmine@...>

Bug #2545: Array#delete_if is borked if user calls 'break'

3 messages 2010/01/01
[#27367] Re: [Bug #2545] Array#delete_if is borked if user calls 'break' — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/01/02

Hi,
[#27368] [Bug #2545](Assigned) Array#delete_if is borked if user calls 'break' — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/01/02

Issue #2545 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#27374] [Bug #2547] error when interpolating a string containing a single backslash into a regexp — caleb clausen <redmine@...>

Bug #2547: error when interpolating a string containing a single backslash into a regexp

4 messages 2010/01/02
[#27422] [Bug #2547](Assigned) error when interpolating a string containing a single backslash into a regexp — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/05

Issue #2547 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27431] [Bug #2547] error when interpolating a string containing a single backslash into a regexp — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/01/05

Issue #2547 has been updated by caleb clausen.
[#29679] [Bug #2547](Closed) error when interpolating a string containing a single backslash into a regexp — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/04/21

Issue #2547 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#27375] [Bug #2548] Marshal dump/load fails when given an array containing certain (rather silly) symbols — caleb clausen <redmine@...>

Bug #2548: Marshal dump/load fails when given an array containing certain (rather silly) symbols

2 messages 2010/01/03
[#27382] [Bug #2548] Marshal dump/load fails when given an array containing certain (rather silly) symbols — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/01/03

Issue #2548 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#27376] [Bug #2549] Redirected stdout don't work on child process on Windows — Heesob Park <redmine@...>

Bug #2549: Redirected stdout don't work on child process on Windows

1 message 2010/01/03

[#27377] [Bug #2550] failed to build with Solaris's make — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...>

Bug #2550: failed to build with Solaris's make

1 message 2010/01/03

[#27378] [Bug #2551] case/when matches literal *[1,2,3] but not variable *ary — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...>

Bug #2551: case/when matches literal *[1,2,3] but not variable *ary

4 messages 2010/01/03
[#27379] [Bug #2551] case/when matches literal *[1,2,3] but not variable *ary — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...> 2010/01/03

Issue #2551 has been updated by Jeremy Kemper.
[#27911] [Bug #2551] case/when matches literal *[1,2,3] but not variable *ary — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #2551 has been updated by Jeremy Kemper.
[#28093] [Bug #2551] case/when matches literal *[1,2,3] but not variable *ary — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...> 2010/02/07

Issue #2551 has been updated by Jeremy Kemper.

[#27380] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Dan Peterson <redmine@...>

Bug #2553: Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls

21 messages 2010/01/03
[#27381] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Dan Peterson <redmine@...> 2010/01/03

Issue #2553 has been updated by Dan Peterson.
[#29826] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/04/27

Issue #2553 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#29791] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Dan Peterson <redmine@...> 2010/04/26

Issue #2553 has been updated by Dan Peterson.
[#30832] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Patrick Mohr <redmine@...> 2010/06/19

Issue #2553 has been updated by Patrick Mohr.
[#30844] Re: [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Kirk Haines <wyhaines@...> 2010/06/21

On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Patrick Mohr <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#30835] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Motohiro KOSAKI <redmine@...> 2010/06/20

Issue #2553 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.
[#30836] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Motohiro KOSAKI <redmine@...> 2010/06/20

Issue #2553 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.
[#30837] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Motohiro KOSAKI <redmine@...> 2010/06/20

Issue #2553 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.
[#30845] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/06/21

Issue #2553 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#30872] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Motohiro KOSAKI <redmine@...> 2010/06/23

Issue #2553 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.
[#30875] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Motohiro KOSAKI <redmine@...> 2010/06/23

Issue #2553 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.
[#31128] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Motohiro KOSAKI <redmine@...> 2010/07/08

Issue #2553 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.
[#31103] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Andre Nathan <redmine@...> 2010/07/07

Issue #2553 has been updated by Andre Nathan.
[#31143] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/07/09

Issue #2553 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#31164] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Andre Nathan <redmine@...> 2010/07/09

Issue #2553 has been updated by Andre Nathan.
[#31171] Re: [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2010/07/10

2010/7/10 Andre Nathan <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
[#31172] Re: [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2010/07/10

2010/7/10 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>:
[#31173] Re: [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2010/07/10

> following patch works both 32bit and 64bit on my environment.
[#31209] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Andre Nathan <redmine@...> 2010/07/12

Issue #2553 has been updated by Andre Nathan.
[#33280] [Backport87-Bug#2553][Closed] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/11/22

Issue #2553 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#27388] [Bug #2554] Net::FTP should not use MSG_OOB — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #2554: Net::FTP should not use MSG_OOB

5 messages 2010/01/04
[#27408] [Bug #2554](Assigned) Net::FTP should not use MSG_OOB — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...> 2010/01/05

Issue #2554 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.
[#27439] Re: [Bug #2554] Net::FTP should not use MSG_OOB — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/06

2010/1/4 Hongli Lai <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
[#27440] Re: [Bug #2554] Net::FTP should not use MSG_OOB — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2010/01/06

Hi,
[#30111] [Bug #2554](Rejected) Net::FTP should not use MSG_OOB — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...> 2010/05/08

Issue #2554 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.

[#27393] Re: compressed pointers? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Martin wrote:

2 messages 2010/01/04
[#27591] Re: compressed pointers? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/01/14

> I was hoping that the internal pointers of the largest elements could

[#27395] [Bug #2555] "case n when *VALID" Broken in Ruby 1.8.8; affects Ruby on Rails — Sam Ruby <redmine@...>

Bug #2555: "case n when *VALID" Broken in Ruby 1.8.8; affects Ruby on Rails

7 messages 2010/01/04
[#27396] [Bug #2555] "case n when *VALID" Broken in Ruby 1.8.8; affects Ruby on Rails — Sam Ruby <redmine@...> 2010/01/04

Issue #2555 has been updated by Sam Ruby.
[#27397] [Bug #2555] "case n when *VALID" Broken in Ruby 1.8.8; affects Ruby on Rails — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...> 2010/01/04

Issue #2555 has been updated by Jeremy Kemper.
[#28092] [Bug #2555] "case n when *VALID" Broken in Ruby 1.8.8; affects Ruby on Rails — Sam Ruby <redmine@...> 2010/02/07

Issue #2555 has been updated by Sam Ruby.
[#28094] [Bug #2555] "case n when *VALID" Broken in Ruby 1.8.8; affects Ruby on Rails — Akinori MUSHA <redmine@...> 2010/02/07

Issue #2555 has been updated by Akinori MUSHA.
[#28323] [Bug #2555] "case n when *VALID" Broken in Ruby 1.8.8; affects Ruby on Rails — Sam Ruby <redmine@...> 2010/02/24

Issue #2555 has been updated by Sam Ruby.
[#28326] [Bug #2555](Closed) "case n when *VALID" Broken in Ruby 1.8.8; affects Ruby on Rails — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/02/24

Issue #2555 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#27401] [Backport #2556] Should r24500 be backported to 1.8? — Brian Ford <redmine@...>

Backport #2556: Should r24500 be backported to 1.8?

3 messages 2010/01/04
[#29836] [Backport #2556] Should r24500 be backported to 1.8? — Akinori MUSHA <redmine@...> 2010/04/28

Issue #2556 has been updated by Akinori MUSHA.
[#31663] [Backport #2556] Should r24500 be backported to 1.8? — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2010/08/10

Issue #2556 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.

[#27402] [Bug #2557] Segmentation fault in Marshal.load in Rails' ActiveSupport in 1.8.7-p248 only — Rhett Sutphin <redmine@...>

Bug #2557: Segmentation fault in Marshal.load in Rails' ActiveSupport in 1.8.7-p248 only

7 messages 2010/01/04
[#29283] [Backport #2557] Segmentation fault in Marshal.load in Rails' ActiveSupport in 1.8.7-p248 only — Greg Moreno <redmine@...> 2010/04/06

Issue #2557 has been updated by Greg Moreno.
[#27487] [Bug #2557](Closed) Segmentation fault in Marshal.load in Rails' ActiveSupport in 1.8.7-p248 only — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/01/08

Issue #2557 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#29046] [Backport #2557] Segmentation fault in Marshal.load in Rails' ActiveSupport in 1.8.7-p248 only — Rhett Sutphin <redmine@...> 2010/03/26

Issue #2557 has been updated by Rhett Sutphin.
[#29239] [Backport #2557] Segmentation fault in Marshal.load in Rails' ActiveSupport in 1.8.7-p248 only — Rodney Woodruff <redmine@...> 2010/04/03

Issue #2557 has been updated by Rodney Woodruff.
[#29284] [Backport #2557] Segmentation fault in Marshal.load in Rails' ActiveSupport in 1.8.7-p248 only — Greg Moreno <redmine@...> 2010/04/06

Issue #2557 has been updated by Greg Moreno.
[#29642] [Backport #2557](Closed) Segmentation fault in Marshal.load in Rails' ActiveSupport in 1.8.7-p248 only — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/04/19

Issue #2557 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#27416] [Bug #2558] r24591 causes Segfault — Alex Legler <redmine@...>

Bug #2558: r24591 causes Segfault

6 messages 2010/01/05
[#29850] [Bug #2558](Closed) r24591 causes Segfault — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/28

Issue #2558 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#27910] [Bug #2558] r24591 causes Segfault — Alex Legler <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #2558 has been updated by Alex Legler.
[#27871] [Bug #2558] r24591 causes Segfault — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #2558 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#27888] [Bug #2558](Open) r24591 causes Segfault — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #2558 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#29630] [Bug #2558] r24591 causes Segfault — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/19

Issue #2558 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#27420] closing of the stderr pipe not detected - issue in 1.9.1? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2010/01/05
[#27423] Re: closing of the stderr pipe not detected - issue in 1.9.1? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/05

2010/1/5 Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>:
[#27424] Re: closing of the stderr pipe not detected - issue in 1.9.1? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2010/01/05

2010/1/5 Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org>:
[#27427] Re: closing of the stderr pipe not detected - issue in 1.9.1? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/05

2010/1/6 Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>:
[#27428] Re: closing of the stderr pipe not detected - issue in 1.9.1? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2010/01/05

2010/1/5 Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org>:

[#27425] [Bug #2559] IO#write raises Errno::EINVAL instead of expected Errno::EPIPE — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #2559: IO#write raises Errno::EINVAL instead of expected Errno::EPIPE

6 messages 2010/01/05
[#27426] [Bug #2559] IO#write raises Errno::EINVAL instead of expected Errno::EPIPE — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2010/01/05

Issue #2559 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#27430] [Bug #2559] IO#write raises Errno::EINVAL instead of expected Errno::EPIPE — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2010/01/05

Issue #2559 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#27489] [Bug #2559](Closed) IO#write raises Errno::EINVAL instead of expected Errno::EPIPE — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/01/08

Issue #2559 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#28059] Re: [Bug #2559](Closed) IO#write raises Errno::EINVAL instead of expected Errno::EPIPE — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2010/02/04

Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#30321] [Backport #2559](Closed) IO#write raises Errno::EINVAL instead of expected Errno::EPIPE — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/05/20

Issue #2559 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#27429] [Bug #2560] IO.read not always closes the file — Vladimir Sizikov <redmine@...>

Bug #2560: IO.read not always closes the file

4 messages 2010/01/05
[#27483] Re: [Bug #2560] IO.read not always closes the file — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/01/08

Hello,
[#27484] Re: [Bug #2560] IO.read not always closes the file — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/08

Hi,
[#27486] [Bug #2560](Closed) IO.read not always closes the file — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/01/08

Issue #2560 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#27435] Re: [Feature #1082] add Object#singleton_class method — "Andrew Choi" <achoi@...>

1 message 2010/01/06

[#27437] [Feature #2561] 1.8.7 Patch reduces time cost of Rational operations by 50%. — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...>

Feature #2561: 1.8.7 Patch reduces time cost of Rational operations by 50%.

9 messages 2010/01/06
[#27450] [Feature #2561] 1.8.7 Patch reduces time cost of Rational operations by 50%. — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2010/01/06

Issue #2561 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.
[#27453] Re: [Feature #2561] 1.8.7 Patch reduces time cost of Rational operations by 50%. — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/01/06

> File ruby-1.8.7-rational.patch added
[#27457] Re: [Feature #2561] 1.8.7 Patch reduces time cost of Rational operations by 50%. — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2010/01/07

[#27438] [Feature #2561](Assigned) 1.8.7 Patch reduces time cost of Rational operations by 50%. — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/06

Issue #2561 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27541] [Feature #2561] 1.8.7 Patch reduces time cost of Rational operations by 50%. — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2010/01/11

Issue #2561 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.
[#27665] [Feature #2561] 1.8.7 Patch reduces time cost of Rational operations by 50%. — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2010/01/21

Issue #2561 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.
[#27737] [Feature #2561] 1.8.7 Patch reduces time cost of Rational operations by 50%. — Akinori MUSHA <redmine@...> 2010/01/23

Issue #2561 has been updated by Akinori MUSHA.
[#28064] [Feature #2561](Closed) 1.8.7 Patch reduces time cost of Rational operations by 50%. — Akinori MUSHA <redmine@...> 2010/02/05

Issue #2561 has been updated by Akinori MUSHA.

[#27441] [Bug #2562] String#hex strange behavior — Ivan Samsonov <redmine@...>

Bug #2562: String#hex strange behavior

2 messages 2010/01/06
[#27442] [Bug #2562](Rejected) String#hex strange behavior — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/06

Issue #2562 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#27446] [Bug #2563] Segmentation fault using module_eval — James Conroy-Finn <redmine@...>

Bug #2563: Segmentation fault using module_eval

2 messages 2010/01/06
[#27499] [Backport #2563](Assigned) Segmentation fault using module_eval — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/01/09

Issue #2563 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#27447] [Bug #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Aliaksey Kandratsenka <redmine@...>

Bug #2564: [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork

18 messages 2010/01/06
[#27865] [Bug #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Aliaksey Kandratsenka <redmine@...> 2010/01/26

Issue #2564 has been updated by Aliaksey Kandratsenka.
[#27899] [Bug #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Aliaksey Kandratsenka <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #2564 has been updated by Aliaksey Kandratsenka.
[#27452] [Bug #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2010/01/06

Issue #2564 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#27469] [Bug #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Aliaksey Kandratsenka <redmine@...> 2010/01/07

Issue #2564 has been updated by Aliaksey Kandratsenka.
[#27843] [Bug #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Aliaksey Kandratsenka <redmine@...> 2010/01/26

Issue #2564 has been updated by Aliaksey Kandratsenka.
[#27844] [Bug #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/26

Issue #2564 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27857] [Bug #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/26

Issue #2564 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#27866] [Bug #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Aliaksey Kandratsenka <redmine@...> 2010/01/26

Issue #2564 has been updated by Aliaksey Kandratsenka.
[#27893] [Bug #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Motohiro KOSAKI <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #2564 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.
[#27923] [Bug #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/28

Issue #2564 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27925] [Bug #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Aliaksey Kandratsenka <redmine@...> 2010/01/28

Issue #2564 has been updated by Aliaksey Kandratsenka.
[#27936] Re: [Bug #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/01/28

> You should merge r25629 to 1.9.1. My patch is not necessary. And it doesn't solve issue completely as I see now. 'cause child can see some bad state left by running timer_thread_function.
[#28047] [Bug #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Aliaksey Kandratsenka <redmine@...> 2010/02/04

Issue #2564 has been updated by Aliaksey Kandratsenka.
[#28049] [Bug #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/02/04

Issue #2564 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#28377] [Backport #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Aliaksey Kandratsenka <redmine@...> 2010/02/28

Issue #2564 has been updated by Aliaksey Kandratsenka.
[#28738] [Backport #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Aliaksey Kandratsenka <redmine@...> 2010/03/18

Issue #2564 has been updated by Aliaksey Kandratsenka.
[#28788] [Backport #2564](Closed) [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/03/19

Issue #2564 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#27448] [Feature:trunk] adding hooks for better tracing — Yugui <yugui@...>

Hi,

7 messages 2010/01/06
[#27449] Re: [Feature:trunk] adding hooks for better tracing — Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@...> 2010/01/06

This is somewhat related to work I've been doing on and off (but recently
[#27461] Re: [Feature:trunk] adding hooks for better tracing — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2010/01/07

+1
[#27455] Re: [Feature:trunk] adding hooks for better tracing — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/01/06

> Here is a patch to add the hooks I and ko1 talked about. (attached)
[#27459] Re: [Feature:trunk] adding hooks for better tracing — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2010/01/07

Roger Pack wrote:
[#27470] Re: [Feature:trunk] adding hooks for better tracing — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/01/07

Hi,
[#28757] Re: [Feature:trunk] adding hooks for better tracing — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/03/18

Hi Yugui,

[#27451] [Bug #2567] Net::HTTP does not handle encoding correctly — Ryan Sims <redmine@...>

Bug #2567: Net::HTTP does not handle encoding correctly

7 messages 2010/01/06
[#29917] [Feature #2567] Net::HTTP does not handle encoding correctly — Carsten Bormann <redmine@...> 2010/05/01

Issue #2567 has been updated by Carsten Bormann.
[#27466] [Bug #2567] Net::HTTP does not handle encoding correctly — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/07

Issue #2567 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#29636] [Feature #2567] Net::HTTP does not handle encoding correctly — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...> 2010/04/19

Issue #2567 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.
[#29631] [Feature #2567] Net::HTTP does not handle encoding correctly — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/19

Issue #2567 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29994] [Feature #2567] Net::HTTP does not handle encoding correctly — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/05/04

Issue #2567 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#29998] Re: [Feature #2567] Net::HTTP does not handle encoding correctly — anshul solanki <anshulsolanki89@...> 2010/05/04

unsubscribe me

[#27456] Re: better GC? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

> Yes, but unfortunately it's not small at all. GC has a lot of

4 messages 2010/01/06
[#27458] Re: better GC? — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2010/01/07

Write barriers are expensive, it's *really* difficult to do unless your
[#27465] Re: better GC? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2010/01/07

Excerpts from Kurt Stephens's message of Thu Jan 07 02:23:53 +0200 2010:
[#27463] Re: better GC? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/07

Hi,

[#27460] [Bug #2568] Segmentation fault deleting key named :class via Hash#delete defined via define_method — Caio Chassot <redmine@...>

Bug #2568: Segmentation fault deleting key named :class via Hash#delete defined via define_method

2 messages 2010/01/07
[#27564] [Bug #2568] Segmentation fault deleting key named :class via Hash#delete defined via define_method — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/01/12

Issue #2568 has been updated by _ wanabe.

[#27462] difficulty building 1_8 branch — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Currently when I try to build ruby_1_8 branch using mingw/msys, I get:

1 message 2010/01/07

[#27464] ping: test_io patch for mingw — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

If anybody has a chance, could I get some attention toward:

1 message 2010/01/07

[#27468] [Bug #2570] ruby never stops executing when installing fxruby-1.6.20-x86-mingw32.gem — Mario Ray Mahardhika <redmine@...>

Bug #2570: ruby never stops executing when installing fxruby-1.6.20-x86-mingw32.gem

2 messages 2010/01/07
[#31369] [Bug #2570] ruby never stops executing when installing fxruby-1.6.20-x86-mingw32.gem — Mario Ray Mahardhika <redmine@...> 2010/07/20

Issue #2570 has been updated by Mario Ray Mahardhika.

[#27472] what to do when no feedback — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Question:

3 messages 2010/01/07
[#27473] Re: what to do when no feedback — Kirk Haines <wyhaines@...> 2010/01/07

If it's something for 1.8.6, feel free to poke me directly --
[#27500] Re: what to do when no feedback — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2010/01/09

(2010/01/07 23:48), Roger Pack wrote:

[#27474] [Bug #2573] Bug with gem mysql 2.8.1 and ruby >= 1.9.0 — Grégory Duchatelet <redmine@...>

Bug #2573: Bug with gem mysql 2.8.1 and ruby >= 1.9.0

3 messages 2010/01/07
[#27475] [Bug #2573] Bug with gem mysql 2.8.1 and ruby >= 1.9.0 — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/01/07

Issue #2573 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#27485] [Bug #2573] Bug with gem mysql 2.8.1 and ruby >= 1.9.0 — Grégory Duchatelet <redmine@...> 2010/01/08

Issue #2573 has been updated by Gr辿gory Duchatelet.

[#27481] easier rb_thread_blocking_region — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Awhile back I wrote a wrapper for rb_thread_blocking_region

3 messages 2010/01/07
[#27490] Re: easier rb_thread_blocking_region — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/01/08

Hi,
[#27495] Re: easier rb_thread_blocking_region — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/01/08

>> b_thread_blocking_region_variable_params(10, &mysql_real_connect,

[#27492] [Bug #2577] Ruby 1.9.2 Preview 1 Aborts when script/generate is used — Conrad Taylor <redmine@...>

Bug #2577: Ruby 1.9.2 Preview 1 Aborts when script/generate is used

4 messages 2010/01/08
[#27493] [Bug #2577] Ruby 1.9.2 Preview 1 Aborts when script/generate is used — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/01/08

Issue #2577 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#27950] [Bug #2577] Ruby 1.9.2 Preview 1 Aborts when script/generate is used — Eugene Pimenov <redmine@...> 2010/01/29

Issue #2577 has been updated by Eugene Pimenov.
[#29632] [Bug #2577](Closed) Ruby 1.9.2 Preview 1 Aborts when script/generate is used — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/19

Issue #2577 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#27501] [Bug #2578] Requiring a relative path with an empty $LOAD_PATH raises LoadError on 1.8 — Brian Ford <redmine@...>

Bug #2578: Requiring a relative path with an empty $LOAD_PATH raises LoadError on 1.8

1 message 2010/01/09

[#27502] [Bug #2580] rake clean removes core directory — John Downey <redmine@...>

Bug #2580: rake clean removes core directory

2 messages 2010/01/09
[#27511] [Bug #2580](Rejected) rake clean removes core directory — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/01/09

Issue #2580 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#27504] C can't instantiate over existing classes? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Is this expected? [1.9.1]

4 messages 2010/01/09
[#27505] Re: C can't instantiate over existing classes? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/09

Hi,
[#27506] Re: C can't instantiate over existing classes? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2010/01/09

On 1/9/10 4:37 PM, Roger Pack wrote:
[#27508] Re: C can't instantiate over existing classes? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/01/09

> StringIO is subclassed from Data, so if you already had it defined without the

[#27507] [Bug #2582] wrong determinant is calculated for matrix — tammo tjarks <redmine@...>

Bug #2582: wrong determinant is calculated for matrix

2 messages 2010/01/09
[#27510] [Bug #2582](Rejected) wrong determinant is calculated for matrix — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2010/01/09

Issue #2582 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#27509] Tcl +msys possible in 1.9.1, not in trunk? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Currently with trying to compile the tcl extension with 1.9.1

1 message 2010/01/09

[#27513] [Feature #2586] openssl: Load root certificates on Windows — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Feature #2586: openssl: Load root certificates on Windows

4 messages 2010/01/10
[#27514] [Feature #2586](Open) openssl: Load root certificates on Windows — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/01/10

Issue #2586 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.
[#27529] [Feature #2586] openssl: Load root certificates on Windows — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/11

Issue #2586 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#28758] [Feature #2586](Rejected) openssl: Load root certificates on Windows — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/18

Issue #2586 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#27515] [Bug #2587] Forced definition of struct timezone under MinGW — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #2587: Forced definition of struct timezone under MinGW

4 messages 2010/01/10
[#27552] [Bug #2587] Forced definition of struct timezone under MinGW — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/11

Issue #2587 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#27554] [Bug #2587] Forced definition of struct timezone under MinGW — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/01/11

Issue #2587 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#27572] [Bug #2587](Closed) Forced definition of struct timezone under MinGW — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/01/12

Issue #2587 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#27516] [Bug #2588] Forced definition of stati64 and _stati64 under MinGW — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #2588: Forced definition of stati64 and _stati64 under MinGW

4 messages 2010/01/10
[#31573] [Bug #2588] Forced definition of stati64 and _stati64 under MinGW — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/07/31

Issue #2588 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#31576] [Bug #2588][Closed] Forced definition of stati64 and _stati64 under MinGW — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/08/01

Issue #2588 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#31599] [Bug #2588] Forced definition of stati64 and _stati64 under MinGW — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/08/02

Issue #2588 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#27517] [Bug #2589] mkmf.rb bug on "make distclean" if build fails — Daniel Berger <redmine@...>

Bug #2589: mkmf.rb bug on "make distclean" if build fails

3 messages 2010/01/10
[#27523] Re: [Bug #2589] mkmf.rb bug on "make distclean" if build fails — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/01/10

Hi,
[#27527] [Bug #2589] mkmf.rb bug on "make distclean" if build fails — Daniel Berger <redmine@...> 2010/01/11

Issue #2589 has been updated by Daniel Berger.

[#27518] [Bug #2590] [BUG] Segmentation fault — Stelios Nikolidakis <redmine@...>

Bug #2590: [BUG] Segmentation fault

4 messages 2010/01/10
[#27521] [Bug #2590] [BUG] Segmentation fault — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/01/10

Issue #2590 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#27519] [Bug #2590] [BUG] Segmentation fault — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/01/10

Issue #2590 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#27520] [Bug #2590] [BUG] Segmentation fault — Stelios Nikolidakis <redmine@...> 2010/01/10

Issue #2590 has been updated by Stelios Nikolidakis.

[#27522] require behavior in 1.9 with respect to loading files with different extensions — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2010/01/10
[#27524] Re: require behavior in 1.9 with respect to loading files with different extensions — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/01/10

Hi,
[#27559] Re: require behavior in 1.9 with respect to loading files with different extensions — Wilson Bilkovich <wilsonb@...> 2010/01/12

On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#27573] Re: require behavior in 1.9 with respect to loading files with different extensions — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2010/01/12

Excerpts from Wilson Bilkovich's message of Tue Jan 12 05:25:11 +0200 2010:

[#27525] [Bug #2592] Cannot compile 1.8.6-p388 under MinGW due F_GETFD being underclared — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #2592: Cannot compile 1.8.6-p388 under MinGW due F_GETFD being underclared

5 messages 2010/01/11
[#27639] [Backport #2592](Closed) Cannot compile 1.8.6-p388 under MinGW due F_GETFD being underclared — Kirk Haines <redmine@...> 2010/01/20

Issue #2592 has been updated by Kirk Haines.
[#27526] Re: [Bug #2592] Cannot compile 1.8.6-p388 under MinGW due F_GETFD being underclared — Kirk Haines <wyhaines@...> 2010/01/11

On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Luis Lavena <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#27528] [Backport #2592] Cannot compile 1.8.6-p388 under MinGW due F_GETFD being underclared — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/01/11

Issue #2592 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#27557] [Backport #2592] Cannot compile 1.8.6-p388 under MinGW due F_GETFD being underclared — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/01/12

Issue #2592 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#27545] [Feature #2594] 1.8.7 Patch: Reduce time spent in gc.c is_pointer_to_heap(). — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...>

Feature #2594: 1.8.7 Patch: Reduce time spent in gc.c is_pointer_to_heap().

8 messages 2010/01/11
[#27677] [Feature #2594] 1.8.7 Patch: Reduce time spent in gc.c is_pointer_to_heap(). — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2010/01/22

Issue #2594 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.
[#27705] Re: [Feature #2594] 1.8.7 Patch: Reduce time spent in gc.c is_pointer_to_heap(). — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/01/22

> I heard from the REE guys that 1.9 heaps do not grow exponentially, but remain fixed. n that case a linear O(1) probe function could help find either the min or max index, before doing a binary search.
[#27712] Re: [Feature #2594] 1.8.7 Patch: Reduce time spent in gc.c is_pointer_to_heap(). — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2010/01/22

Roger Pack wrote:
[#27546] Re: [Feature #2594] 1.8.7 Patch: Reduce time spent in gc.c is_pointer_to_heap(). — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/11

Hi,
[#27549] Re: [Feature #2594] 1.8.7 Patch: Reduce time spent in gc.c is_pointer_to_heap(). — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2010/01/11

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#30164] [Feature #2594] 1.8.7 Patch: Reduce time spent in gc.c is_pointer_to_heap(). — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2010/05/11

Issue #2594 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.
[#30166] [Feature #2594] 1.8.7 Patch: Reduce time spent in gc.c is_pointer_to_heap(). — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/05/11

Issue #2594 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#27551] [Bug #2595] Add crc32_combine and adler32_combine to zlib API — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Bug #2595: Add crc32_combine and adler32_combine to zlib API

7 messages 2010/01/11
[#27560] [Bug #2595] Add crc32_combine and adler32_combine to zlib API — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/12

Issue #2595 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27613] [Feature #2595](Closed) Add crc32_combine and adler32_combine to zlib API — Anonymous <redmine@...> 2010/01/19

Issue #2595 has been updated by Anonymous.
[#27614] Re: [Bug #2595] Add crc32_combine and adler32_combine to zlib API — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2010/01/19

Hi Aaron,
[#27638] Re: [Bug #2595] Add crc32_combine and adler32_combine to zlib API — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/01/20

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:22:25AM +0900, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
[#27660] Re: [Bug #2595] Add crc32_combine and adler32_combine to zlib API — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2010/01/21

Hi Aaron,
[#27663] Re: [Bug #2595] Add crc32_combine and adler32_combine to zlib API — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/01/21

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:46 AM, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi <nakahiro@gmail.com> wrote:

[#27558] [Bug #2596] Openssl Segmentation Faults on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.3 — Mike Hodgson <redmine@...>

Bug #2596: Openssl Segmentation Faults on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.3

3 messages 2010/01/12
[#27566] [Bug #2596] Openssl Segmentation Faults on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.3 — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/12

Issue #2596 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27575] [Bug #2596] Openssl Segmentation Faults on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.3 — Mike Hodgson <redmine@...> 2010/01/13

Issue #2596 has been updated by Mike Hodgson.

[#27561] [Bug #2597] Crash in p248 while installing gem — Aleksey Palazhchenko <redmine@...>

Bug #2597: Crash in p248 while installing gem

6 messages 2010/01/12
[#28649] [Backport #2597] Crash in p248 while installing gem — Igal Koshevoy <redmine@...> 2010/03/14

Issue #2597 has been updated by Igal Koshevoy.
[#27562] [Bug #2597] Crash in p248 while installing gem — Aleksey Palazhchenko <redmine@...> 2010/01/12

Issue #2597 has been updated by Aleksey Palazhchenko.
[#27612] [Backport #2597] Crash in p248 while installing gem — Aleksey Palazhchenko <redmine@...> 2010/01/18

Issue #2597 has been updated by Aleksey Palazhchenko.
[#28127] [Backport #2597] Crash in p248 while installing gem — Hendrik Volkmer <redmine@...> 2010/02/09

Issue #2597 has been updated by Hendrik Volkmer.
[#28194] [Backport #2597] Crash in p248 while installing gem — Lawrence Pit <redmine@...> 2010/02/17

Issue #2597 has been updated by Lawrence Pit.

[#27577] [Bug #2601] BasicObject#initialize should raise an error — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #2601: BasicObject#initialize should raise an error

2 messages 2010/01/13
[#27579] Re: [Bug #2601] BasicObject#initialize should raise an error — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/13

Hi,

[#27583] Strange behavior of String#append in 1.9 — Vladimir Sizikov <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2010/01/13
[#27584] Re: Strange behavior of String#append in 1.9 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/01/14

Hi,

[#27595] unable to trap in doze/1.9? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

This snippet:

1 message 2010/01/14

[#27599] Fwd: [redmine4ruby-lang:267] [Bug #2606] Ruby crashes when Logger is used in trap handler — Yugui <yugui@...>

This issue was reported to a wrong project.

1 message 2010/01/15

[#27600] [Bug #2608] 1999.0 becomes 1998 — Edmond Chui <redmine@...>

Bug #2608: 1999.0 becomes 1998

3 messages 2010/01/15
[#27602] Re: [Bug #2608] 1999.0 becomes 1998 — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/01/15

Welcome to the world of Float ;)
[#27601] [Bug #2608](Rejected) 1999.0 becomes 1998 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2010/01/15

Issue #2608 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#27603] [Bug #2609] threaded tests fail in 1.9.1 on OS X 10.5 — Michal Suchanek <redmine@...>

Bug #2609: threaded tests fail in 1.9.1 on OS X 10.5

2 messages 2010/01/16
[#27766] [Bug #2609](Assigned) threaded tests fail in 1.9.1 on OS X 10.5 — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2609 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#27606] [Bug #2610] c-return hooks aren't always there — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2610: c-return hooks aren't always there

2 messages 2010/01/16
[#27758] [Bug #2610](Closed) c-return hooks aren't always there — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2010/01/24

Issue #2610 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.

[#27608] [Bug #2611] Hang while executing END blocks with redirected stderr — Tomas Matousek <redmine@...>

Bug #2611: Hang while executing END blocks with redirected stderr

5 messages 2010/01/16
[#27879] [Bug #2611] Hang while executing END blocks with redirected stderr — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #2611 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#27926] [Bug #2611] Hang while executing END blocks with redirected stderr — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/01/28

Issue #2611 has been updated by _ wanabe.
[#30733] [Bug #2611] Hang while executing END blocks with redirected stderr — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/06/11

Issue #2611 has been updated by _ wanabe.
[#30841] [Bug #2611][Closed] Hang while executing END blocks with redirected stderr — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/06/21

Issue #2611 has been updated by _ wanabe.

[#27616] [Bug #2612] Use POSIX shell in Makefile — Brian Egge <redmine@...>

Bug #2612: Use POSIX shell in Makefile

3 messages 2010/01/19
[#27648] Re: [Bug #2612] Use POSIX shell in Makefile — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/01/21

Hi,
[#29978] [Bug #2612](Rejected) Use POSIX shell in Makefile — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/03

Issue #2612 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#27617] [Bug #2613] Interpreter crash using BlueCloth gem — Gavin Kistner <redmine@...>

Bug #2613: Interpreter crash using BlueCloth gem

2 messages 2010/01/19
[#27618] [Bug #2613](Third Party's Issue) Interpreter crash using BlueCloth gem — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/01/19

Issue #2613 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#27620] [Bug #2614] Resolv.[getaddress] should fail gracefully on OSX when offline — Ronald Tse <redmine@...>

Bug #2614: Resolv.[getaddress] should fail gracefully on OSX when offline

3 messages 2010/01/19
[#27630] [Backport #2614](Assigned) Resolv.[getaddress] should fail gracefully on OSX when offline — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/01/20

Issue #2614 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#27688] [Backport #2614] Resolv.[getaddress] should fail gracefully on OSX when offline — Ronald Tse <redmine@...> 2010/01/22

Issue #2614 has been updated by Ronald Tse.

[#27625] [Bug #2616] unable to trap in doze — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2616: unable to trap in doze

8 messages 2010/01/19
[#30798] [Bug #2616] unable to trap in doze — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/06/17

Issue #2616 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#27795] [Bug #2616](Assigned) unable to trap in doze — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2616 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#28641] [Bug #2616] unable to trap in doze — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/03/13

Issue #2616 has been updated by _ wanabe.
[#28646] Re: [Bug #2616] unable to trap in doze — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/03/13

Hello,
[#30566] [Bug #2616] unable to trap in doze — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/06/03

Issue #2616 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#30574] [Bug #2616] unable to trap in doze — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/06/03

Issue #2616 has been updated by _ wanabe.
[#30873] [Bug #2616] unable to trap in doze — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/06/23

Issue #2616 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#27628] [Feature #2617] Array#to_s behavior different on 1.8.7 and 1.9.1 — robert gleeson <redmine@...>

Feature #2617: Array#to_s behavior different on 1.8.7 and 1.9.1

2 messages 2010/01/20
[#27629] [Feature #2617](Rejected) Array#to_s behavior different on 1.8.7 and 1.9.1 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2010/01/20

Issue #2617 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#27634] [Bug #2618] Win32OLE RuntimeError due CoInitialize not being called — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #2618: Win32OLE RuntimeError due CoInitialize not being called

4 messages 2010/01/20
[#27720] [Bug #2618] Win32OLE RuntimeError due CoInitialize not being called — Masaki Suketa <redmine@...> 2010/01/23

Issue #2618 has been updated by Masaki Suketa.
[#27825] [Bug #2618] Win32OLE RuntimeError due CoInitialize not being called — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2618 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#35077] [Archive91-Backport#2618] Win32OLE RuntimeError due CoInitialize not being called — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2011/02/03

Issue #2618 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#27635] [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #2619: Proposed method: Process.fork_supported?

45 messages 2010/01/20
[#27643] [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/01/21

Issue #2619 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#27644] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/01/21

Hi,
[#27678] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/22

Hi,
[#27684] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/01/22

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#27708] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/22

Hi,
[#27715] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/01/23

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#27738] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/01/23

On 1/22/10, Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:
[#27741] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/01/23

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Caleb Clausen <vikkous@gmail.com> wrote:
[#27742] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/01/23

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
[#27743] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/23

2010/1/24 Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com>:
[#27744] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/01/23

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#27761] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/24

2010/1/23 Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com>:
[#27762] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/01/24

On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#27651] [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2010/01/21

Issue #2619 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#27636] [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2010/01/20

Issue #2619 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#27641] [Bug #2619](Rejected) Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/01/20

Issue #2619 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#27645] [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/01/21

Issue #2619 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#27646] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/21

2010/1/21 Hongli Lai <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
[#27652] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2010/01/21

On 1/21/10 5:20 AM, Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#27653] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/21

2010/1/21 Hongli Lai <hongli@plan99.net>:
[#27655] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2010/01/21

On 1/21/10 10:53 AM, Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#27658] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Vladimir Sizikov <vsizikov@...> 2010/01/21

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Hongli Lai <hongli@plan99.net> wrote:
[#27662] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Vladimir Sizikov <vsizikov@...> 2010/01/21

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#27676] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/22

2010/1/22 Vladimir Sizikov <vsizikov@gmail.com>:
[#27683] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/01/22

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#27686] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/22

2010/1/22 Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com>:
[#27695] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Vladimir Sizikov <vsizikov@...> 2010/01/22

Hi,
[#27700] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/22

2010/1/22 Vladimir Sizikov <vsizikov@gmail.com>:
[#27750] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/24

2010/1/22 Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org>:
[#27756] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Vladimir Sizikov <vsizikov@...> 2010/01/24

Hi,
[#27848] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/26

2010/1/24 Vladimir Sizikov <vsizikov@gmail.com>:
[#27706] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/01/22

>> At the end of the day any
[#27664] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/01/21

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Vladimir Sizikov <vsizikov@gmail.com> wrote:
[#27672] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2010/01/22

On 1/21/10 8:09 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#27675] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/01/22

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Hongli Lai <hongli@plan99.net> wrote:
[#27685] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/01/22

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#27808] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/01/25

>> I propose a method Process.fork_supported? which returns whether fork is supported on the current platform. See attached patch.
[#27826] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2010/01/25

On 1/25/10 3:46 PM, Roger Pack wrote:
[#27827] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2010/01/25

> Thanks but I'm fine. I currently use the following code:
[#27839] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2010/01/25

On 1/25/10 7:34 PM, Jon wrote:
[#27836] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/01/25

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Hongli Lai <hongli@plan99.net> wrote:
[#27837] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/01/25

> Thanks but I'm fine. I currently use the following code:
[#27840] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2010/01/25
[#27654] [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2010/01/21

Issue #2619 has been updated by Hongli Lai.

[#27637] [Bug #2620] Pathname#+ generates unexpected path when arg has leading / — Jon Distad <redmine@...>

Bug #2620: Pathname#+ generates unexpected path when arg has leading /

2 messages 2010/01/20
[#27642] [Bug #2620](Rejected) Pathname#+ generates unexpected path when arg has leading / — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/01/20

Issue #2620 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#27650] example of rb_iseq_load — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

I'm sorry that I'm a bit dense, but I can't figure out from the usages

3 messages 2010/01/21
[#27659] Re: example of rb_iseq_load — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2010/01/21

(2010/01/21 15:22), Roger Pack wrote::
[#27809] Re: example of rb_iseq_load — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/01/25

> rb_iseq_load() loads an array object which is generated by ISeq#to_a.

[#27656] A patch to rdoc — Tetsu Soh <tetsu.soh.dev@...>

Hello everyone,

8 messages 2010/01/21
[#27657] Re: A patch to rdoc — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...> 2010/01/21

On 21.01.10 11:36, Tetsu Soh wrote:
[#27668] Re: A patch to rdoc — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/01/21

> I compared the generated results(patched and unpatched) using "diff -r"
[#27679] Re: A patch to rdoc — "Tetsu Soh" <tetsu.soh.dev@...> 2010/01/22

--------------------------------------------------
[#27667] Re: A patch to rdoc — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2010/01/21

On Jan 21, 2010, at 02:36, Tetsu Soh wrote:
[#27680] Re: A patch to rdoc — "Tetsu Soh" <tetsu.soh.dev@...> 2010/01/22

Thanks for the information.
[#27718] Re: A patch to rdoc — Tadashi Saito <shiba@...2.accsnet.ne.jp> 2010/01/23

Hi,
[#27719] Re: A patch to rdoc — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/01/23

[#27661] [Bug #2623] drb - circular require — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Bug #2623: drb - circular require

2 messages 2010/01/21
[#27850] [Bug #2623](Closed) drb - circular require — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/26

Issue #2623 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#27666] [Bug #2624] FileUtils.touch can err (windows) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2624: FileUtils.touch can err (windows)

2 messages 2010/01/21
[#27673] [Bug #2624](Rejected) FileUtils.touch can err (windows) — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/01/22

Issue #2624 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#27669] [Bug #2625] rdoc patch for Dir.glob — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2625: rdoc patch for Dir.glob

2 messages 2010/01/21
[#27723] [Bug #2625](Closed) rdoc patch for Dir.glob — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/23

Issue #2625 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#27670] able to re-require $0 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Currently with 1.9.x you cannot "re-require" a file, even if you pass

10 messages 2010/01/21
[#27671] Re: able to re-require $0 — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2010/01/21

Perhaps ruby uses "load $0" on start up?
[#27687] Re: able to re-require $0 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/01/22

Hi,
[#27691] Re: able to re-require $0 — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/01/22

Hi,
[#27693] Re: able to re-require $0 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/01/22

Hi,
[#27697] Re: able to re-require $0 — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2010/01/22

2010/1/22 Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp>:
[#27711] Re: able to re-require $0 — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/01/22

On 1/22/10, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote:
[#27721] Re: able to re-require $0 — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2010/01/23

2010/1/22 Caleb Clausen <vikkous@gmail.com>:
[#27739] Re: able to re-require $0 — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/01/23

On 1/23/10, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote:
[#30922] Re: able to re-require $0 — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/06/27

Hi,

[#27689] [Bug #2626] ROR project into an Executable file — shobana rajaratnam <redmine@...>

Bug #2626: ROR project into an Executable file

1 message 2010/01/22

[#27690] Patch for split docs. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

Thanks to observations of Gabriel Gilder, I've rolled the attached patch

1 message 2010/01/22

[#27692] Gzip(Read|Writ)er.wrap docs? — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

http://ruby-doc.org/stdlib/libdoc/zlib/rdoc/classes/Zlib/GzipWriter.html

1 message 2010/01/22

[#27694] [Bug #2628] 1.9 Hash documentation says hashes not ordered — Denis Defreyne <redmine@...>

Bug #2628: 1.9 Hash documentation says hashes not ordered

3 messages 2010/01/22
[#29947] [Backport #2628](Closed) 1.9 Hash documentation says hashes not ordered — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2010/05/03

Issue #2628 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
[#27703] [Backport #2628](Assigned) 1.9 Hash documentation says hashes not ordered — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/22

Issue #2628 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#27698] [Bug #2629] ConditionVariable#wait(mutex, timeout) should return whether the condition was signalled, not the waited time — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #2629: ConditionVariable#wait(mutex, timeout) should return whether the condition was signalled, not the waited time

8 messages 2010/01/22
[#28693] [Bug #2629] ConditionVariable#wait(mutex, timeout) should return whether the condition was signalled, not the waited time — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/16

Issue #2629 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#28803] Re: [Bug #2629] ConditionVariable#wait(mutex, timeout) should return whether the condition was signalled, not the waited time — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/03/19

Hi,
[#30078] Re: [Bug #2629] ConditionVariable#wait(mutex, timeout) should return whether the condition was signalled, not the waited time — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/05/07

2010/1/22 Hongli Lai <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
[#30137] [Bug #2629](Rejected) ConditionVariable#wait(mutex, timeout) should return whether the condition was signalled, not the waited time — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/10

Issue #2629 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#28826] [Bug #2629] ConditionVariable#wait(mutex, timeout) should return whether the condition was signalled, not the waited time — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2010/03/20

Issue #2629 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#29979] [Bug #2629] ConditionVariable#wait(mutex, timeout) should return whether the condition was signalled, not the waited time — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/03

Issue #2629 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29988] Re: [Bug #2629] ConditionVariable#wait(mutex, timeout) should return whether the condition was signalled, not the waited time — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/05/04

2010/5/4 Yusuke Endoh <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:

[#27699] [Bug #2630] generator.rb missing from 1.9.1 standard library? — Mike Woodhouse <redmine@...>

Bug #2630: generator.rb missing from 1.9.1 standard library?

2 messages 2010/01/22
[#27704] [Bug #2630] generator.rb missing from 1.9.1 standard library? — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/22

Issue #2630 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#27701] [Feature #2631] Allow IO#reopen to take a block — Daniel Berger <redmine@...>

Feature #2631: Allow IO#reopen to take a block

5 messages 2010/01/22
[#27716] [Feature #2631] Allow IO#reopen to take a block — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/01/23

Issue #2631 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#27760] Re: [Feature #2631] Allow IO#reopen to take a block — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2010/01/24

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#27702] [Feature #2631] Allow IO#reopen to take a block — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2010/01/22

Issue #2631 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#27709] Re: [Feature #2631] Allow IO#reopen to take a block — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/22

Hi,

[#27710] [Backport #2633] warning — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Backport #2633: warning

4 messages 2010/01/22
[#27765] [Backport #2633](Assigned) warning — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2633 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#28045] [Backport #2633](Rejected) warning — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2010/02/04

Issue #2633 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
[#28046] [Backport #2633] warning — Kornelius Kalnbach <redmine@...> 2010/02/04

Issue #2633 has been updated by Kornelius Kalnbach.

[#27722] [Feature #2635] Unbundle rdoc — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Feature #2635: Unbundle rdoc

14 messages 2010/01/23
[#27724] Re: [Feature #2635] Unbundle rdoc — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/23

Hi,
[#27745] Re: [Feature #2635] Unbundle rdoc — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/01/24

Hi,
[#27780] Re: [Feature #2635] Unbundle rdoc — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/01/25

[#27784] Re: [Feature #2635] Unbundle rdoc — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2010/01/25

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:
[#27781] Re: [Feature #2635] Unbundle rdoc — John Barnette <jbarnette@...> 2010/01/25

On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:
[#27788] Re: [Feature #2635] Unbundle rdoc — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/01/25

Hi,
[#27733] Re: [Feature #2635] Unbundle rdoc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2010/01/23

On Jan 23, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#27725] [Feature #2635] Unbundle rdoc — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/23

Issue #2635 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27727] Re: [Feature #2635] Unbundle rdoc — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/23

Hi,
[#27730] Re: [Feature #2635] Unbundle rdoc — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2010/01/23

(2010/01/24 0:35), Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#27729] Re: [Feature #2635] Unbundle rdoc — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/01/23

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Yui NARUSE <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#27732] Re: [Feature #2635] Unbundle rdoc — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2010/01/23

(2010/01/24 0:41), Luis Lavena wrote:
[#27731] Re: [Feature #2635] Unbundle rdoc — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/23

Hi,

[#27734] Ruby 2.0: What is classbox? — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>

I've seen this word tossed around a bit, but I've yet to see any description

2 messages 2010/01/23
[#27735] Re: Ruby 2.0: What is classbox? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/23

[#27748] [Bug #2636] Incorrect UTF-16 string length — Vincent Isambart <redmine@...>

Bug #2636: Incorrect UTF-16 string length

9 messages 2010/01/24
[#27751] [Bug #2636](Rejected) Incorrect UTF-16 string length — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/24

Issue #2636 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27752] [Bug #2636] Incorrect UTF-16 string length — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/24

Issue #2636 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27754] Re: [Bug #2636] Incorrect UTF-16 string length — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/24

2010/1/24 Vincent Isambart <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
[#27782] Re: [Bug #2636] Incorrect UTF-16 string length — "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@...> 2010/01/25

What needs to be fixed here is the data, nothing else:
[#27783] Re: [Bug #2636] Incorrect UTF-16 string length — Vincent Isambart <vincent.isambart@...> 2010/01/25

> What needs to be fixed here is the data, nothing else:
[#27890] Re: [Bug #2636] Incorrect UTF-16 string length — "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@...> 2010/01/27

On 2010/01/25 16:37, Vincent Isambart wrote:
[#27892] Re: [Bug #2636] Incorrect UTF-16 string length — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/27

2010/1/27 "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>:
[#27785] [Bug #2636](Closed) Incorrect UTF-16 string length — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2636 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#27753] [Bug #2637] unable to select for < 0.1s in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2637: unable to select for < 0.1s in windows

5 messages 2010/01/24
[#27759] [Bug #2637] unable to select for < 0.1s in windows — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/01/24

Issue #2637 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#27796] [Bug #2637] unable to select for < 0.1s in windows — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2637 has been updated by _ wanabe.
[#27830] Re: [Bug #2637] unable to select for < 0.1s in windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/01/25

Thanks--it works now!
[#27804] [Bug #2637](Closed) unable to select for < 0.1s in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2637 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#27757] [Bug #2638] ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located. — Joel Soete <redmine@...>

Bug #2638: ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located.

10 messages 2010/01/24
[#27817] Re: [Bug #2638] ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located. — Yutaka Kanemoto <kinpoco@...> 2010/01/25

Hello Joel,
[#27818] Re: [Bug #2638] ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located. — Yutaka Kanemoto <kinpoco@...> 2010/01/25

Sorry, it seemed that my issue seemed to be different from yours.
[#27847] [Bug #2638] ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located. — Joel Soete <redmine@...> 2010/01/26

Issue #2638 has been updated by Joel Soete.
[#27886] [Bug #2638] ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located. — Joel Soete <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #2638 has been updated by Joel Soete.
[#27763] [Bug #2638] ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located. — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2638 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27786] [Bug #2638] ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located. — Joel Soete <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2638 has been updated by Joel Soete.
[#27787] [Bug #2638] ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located. — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2638 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27799] [Bug #2638] ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located. — Joel Soete <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2638 has been updated by Joel Soete.
[#27800] [Bug #2638] ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located. — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2638 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#27767] [Feature #2639] ifdef References to __BEOS__ should be changed to also include __HAIKU__ — Alexander von Gluck <redmine@...>

Feature #2639: ifdef References to __BEOS__ should be changed to also include __HAIKU__

7 messages 2010/01/25
[#27771] [Feature #2639] ifdef References to __BEOS__ should be changed to also include __HAIKU__ — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2639 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27774] [Feature #2639] ifdef References to __BEOS__ should be changed to also include __HAIKU__ — Alexander von Gluck <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2639 has been updated by Alexander von Gluck.
[#27775] [Feature #2639](Closed) ifdef References to __BEOS__ should be changed to also include __HAIKU__ — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2639 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#28043] [Feature #2639] ifdef References to __BEOS__ should be changed to also include __HAIKU__ — Chris Roberts <redmine@...> 2010/02/04

Issue #2639 has been updated by Chris Roberts.
[#28051] [Feature #2639] ifdef References to __BEOS__ should be changed to also include __HAIKU__ — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/02/04

Issue #2639 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#28054] [Feature #2639] ifdef References to __BEOS__ should be changed to also include __HAIKU__ — Alexander von Gluck <redmine@...> 2010/02/04

Issue #2639 has been updated by Alexander von Gluck.

[#27768] [Bug #2640] signal code only needs slight changes to make Ruby compile on Haiku-os — Alexander von Gluck <redmine@...>

Bug #2640: signal code only needs slight changes to make Ruby compile on Haiku-os

7 messages 2010/01/25
[#27776] [Bug #2640] signal code only needs slight changes to make Ruby compile on Haiku-os — Alexander von Gluck <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2640 has been updated by Alexander von Gluck.
[#27769] [Bug #2640] signal code only needs slight changes to make Ruby compile on Haiku-os — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2640 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27770] Re: [Bug #2640] signal code only needs slight changes to make Ruby compile on Haiku-os — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/01/25

Hi,
[#27772] [Bug #2640] signal code only needs slight changes to make Ruby compile on Haiku-os — Alexander von Gluck <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2640 has been updated by Alexander von Gluck.
[#27773] [Bug #2640](Third Party's Issue) signal code only needs slight changes to make Ruby compile on Haiku-os — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2640 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27777] [Bug #2640] signal code only needs slight changes to make Ruby compile on Haiku-os — Alexander von Gluck <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2640 has been updated by Alexander von Gluck.

[#27778] [Bug #2641] Seg fault running miniruby during ruby build on Haiku — Alexander von Gluck <redmine@...>

Bug #2641: Seg fault running miniruby during ruby build on Haiku

10 messages 2010/01/25
[#27858] [Bug #2641] Seg fault running miniruby during ruby build on Haiku — Alexander von Gluck <redmine@...> 2010/01/26

Issue #2641 has been updated by Alexander von Gluck.
[#27881] [Bug #2641] Seg fault running miniruby during ruby build on Haiku — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #2641 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27779] [Bug #2641] Seg fault running miniruby during ruby build on Haiku — Alexander von Gluck <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2641 has been updated by Alexander von Gluck.
[#27864] [Bug #2641] Seg fault running miniruby during ruby build on Haiku — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/26

Issue #2641 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#27868] [Bug #2641] Seg fault running miniruby during ruby build on Haiku — Alexander von Gluck <redmine@...> 2010/01/26

Issue #2641 has been updated by Alexander von Gluck.
[#27977] [Bug #2641] Seg fault running miniruby during ruby build on Haiku — Alexander von Gluck <redmine@...> 2010/01/30

Issue #2641 has been updated by Alexander von Gluck.
[#28050] [Bug #2641] Seg fault running miniruby during ruby build on Haiku — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/02/04

Issue #2641 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#30298] [Bug #2641](Feedback) Seg fault running miniruby during ruby build on Haiku — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/18

Issue #2641 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#33897] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#2641] Seg fault running miniruby during ruby build on Haiku — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/12/26

Issue #2641 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#27789] Soap4r error — "THAKUR PRASHANT SINGH" <Prashant_Singh.Thakur@...>

I am getting this error while starting server or client generated from

1 message 2010/01/25

[#27790] [Feature #2643] test/unit redefinition check of test_* method — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>

Feature #2643: test/unit redefinition check of test_* method

3 messages 2010/01/25
[#27801] Re: [Feature #2643] test/unit redefinition check of test_* method — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/01/25

> This leads to a loss of a valuable chance of test. t is good for
[#27803] Re: [Feature #2643] test/unit redefinition check of test_* method — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/01/25

2010/1/25 Benoit Daloze <eregontp@gmail.com>:

[#27791] [Bug #2644] memory over-allocation with regexp — Greg Hazel <redmine@...>

Bug #2644: memory over-allocation with regexp

12 messages 2010/01/25
[#27802] Re: [Bug #2644] memory over-allocation with regexp — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2010/01/25

2010/1/25 Greg Hazel <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
[#27883] [Bug #2644] memory over-allocation with regexp — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #2644 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#28104] [Bug #2644] memory over-allocation with regexp — Greg Hazel <redmine@...> 2010/02/08

Issue #2644 has been updated by Greg Hazel.
[#28105] Re: [Bug #2644] memory over-allocation with regexp — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/02/08

Hi,
[#28108] Re: [Bug #2644] memory over-allocation with regexp — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2010/02/08

Current Ruby 1.9 can run the script,
[#28106] Re: [Bug #2644] memory over-allocation with regexp — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...> 2010/02/08

On 08.02.10 09:36, Greg Hazel wrote:
[#28107] Re: [Bug #2644] memory over-allocation with regexp — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...> 2010/02/08

On 08.02.10 13:26, Kornelius Kalnbach wrote:
[#28111] Re: [Bug #2644] memory over-allocation with regexp — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/02/08

Hi,
[#28126] Re: [Bug #2644] memory over-allocation with regexp — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/02/09

Hi,
[#33353] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#2644] memory over-allocation with regexp — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/11/25

Issue #2644 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#33377] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Bug#2644] memory over-allocation with regexp — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/11/25

Hi,

[#27792] [Feature #2645] Have a method in StringScanner which returns the position in characters rather than in bytes — Stefano Crocco <redmine@...>

Feature #2645: Have a method in StringScanner which returns the position in characters rather than in bytes

3 messages 2010/01/25
[#27820] [Feature #2645] Have a method in StringScanner which returns the position in characters rather than in bytes — Kornelius Kalnbach <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2645 has been updated by Kornelius Kalnbach.
[#27845] [Feature #2645] Have a method in StringScanner which returns the position in characters rather than in bytes — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/26

Issue #2645 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#27793] [Bug #2646] 1.9.2dev segv when compiling with clang 1.1/trunk — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...>

Bug #2646: 1.9.2dev segv when compiling with clang 1.1/trunk

3 messages 2010/01/25
[#27811] [Bug #2646] 1.9.2dev segv when compiling with clang 1.1/trunk — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2646 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#27813] [Bug #2646] 1.9.2dev segv when compiling with clang 1.1/trunk — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2646 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#27794] [Bug #2647] Lack of testing for String#split — Hugh Sasse <redmine@...>

Bug #2647: Lack of testing for String#split

14 messages 2010/01/25
[#27807] [Bug #2647] Lack of testing for String#split — Hugh Sasse <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2647 has been updated by Hugh Sasse.
[#27806] [Bug #2647](Closed) Lack of testing for String#split — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2647 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27810] Re: [Bug #2647](Closed) Lack of testing for String#split — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2010/01/25

On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Yui NARUSE wrote:
[#27805] [Bug #2647] Lack of testing for String#split — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2647 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27797] [Bug #2647] Lack of testing for String#split — Vladimir Sizikov <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2647 has been updated by Vladimir Sizikov.
[#27798] Re: [Bug #2647] Lack of testing for String#split — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/01/25

Here here! The tests in RubySpec are vastly better than those in MRI,
[#27816] Re: [Bug #2647] Lack of testing for String#split — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/01/25

Hi,
[#27814] [Bug #2647] Lack of testing for String#split — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2647 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27815] Re: [Bug #2647] Lack of testing for String#split — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2010/01/25

On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Yui NARUSE wrote:
[#27821] Re: [Bug #2647] Lack of testing for String#split — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2010/01/25

Excerpts from Hugh Sasse's message of Mon Jan 25 17:36:06 +0200 2010:
[#28467] [Bug #2647] Lack of testing for String#split — Dawid Grzesiak <redmine@...> 2010/03/04

Issue #2647 has been updated by Dawid Grzesiak.
[#28468] [Bug #2647] Lack of testing for String#split — Dawid Grzesiak <redmine@...> 2010/03/04

Issue #2647 has been updated by Dawid Grzesiak.
[#28470] Re: [Bug #2647] Lack of testing for String#split — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2010/03/04

On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Dawid Grzesiak wrote:

[#27819] [Bug #2653] Docs missing cases [rpt of Ruby-Core:27690] — Hugh Sasse <redmine@...>

Bug #2653: Docs missing cases [rpt of Ruby-Core:27690]

2 messages 2010/01/25
[#27824] [Bug #2653](Closed) Docs missing cases [rpt of Ruby-Core:27690] — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2653 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#27822] [Backport #2654] segfault on self thread join — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Backport #2654: segfault on self thread join

2 messages 2010/01/25
[#27835] [Backport #2654](Assigned) segfault on self thread join — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/01/25

Issue #2654 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#27823] [Bug #2655] win32OLE processes lose their connection? — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2655: win32OLE processes lose their connection?

4 messages 2010/01/25
[#30158] [Bug #2655](Assigned) win32OLE processes lose their connection? — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/11

Issue #2655 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#30181] [Bug #2655] win32OLE processes lose their connection? — Masaki Suketa <redmine@...> 2010/05/12

Issue #2655 has been updated by Masaki Suketa.
[#30459] [Bug #2655](Rejected) win32OLE processes lose their connection? — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/27

Issue #2655 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#27828] [Bug #2656] Inconsistent docs for Zlib. — Hugh Sasse <redmine@...>

Bug #2656: Inconsistent docs for Zlib. [ruby-core:27692]

5 messages 2010/01/25
[#27832] Re: [Bug #2656] Inconsistent docs for Zlib. — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/01/25

[#27834] Re: [Bug #2656] Inconsistent docs for Zlib. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2010/01/25

On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Ryan Davis wrote:
[#27838] Re: [Bug #2656] Inconsistent docs for Zlib. — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/01/25

[#27841] Re: [Bug #2656] Inconsistent docs for Zlib. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2010/01/25

[#27829] [Bug #2656] Inconsistent docs for Zlib. — Hugh Sasse <redmine@...>

Issue #2656 has been updated by Hugh Sasse.

1 message 2010/01/25

[#27833] Announcing memprof: a ruby level memory profiler — Joe Damato <ice799@...>

Hi -

1 message 2010/01/25

[#27842] [Bug #2656] Inconsistent docs for Zlib. — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Issue #2656 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

3 messages 2010/01/26
[#27846] Re: [Bug #2656] Inconsistent docs for Zlib. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2010/01/26

[#27849] Re: [Bug #2656] Inconsistent docs for Zlib. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2010/01/26

Excuse me following up to myself, but there's a first cut of

[#27851] [Bug #2656](Closed) Inconsistent docs for Zlib. — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Issue #2656 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

2 messages 2010/01/26
[#27852] Re: [Bug #2656](Closed) Inconsistent docs for Zlib. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2010/01/26

[#27853] [bug:trunk] pstore.rb:134: warning: instance variable @thread_safe not initialized — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>

With -v (or -w), pstore warns about @thread_safe:

1 message 2010/01/26

[#27854] [Bug #2659] Problem when building with pthreads enabled — Konstantinos Pachnis <redmine@...>

Bug #2659: Problem when building with pthreads enabled

3 messages 2010/01/26
[#30661] [Backport #2659][Closed] Problem when building with pthreads enabled — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/06/08

Issue #2659 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#27882] [Backport #2659](Assigned) Problem when building with pthreads enabled — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #2659 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#27859] [Bug #1392] Object#extend leaks memory on Ruby 1.9.1 — Jason Earl <redmine@...>

Issue #1392 has been updated by Jason Earl.

1 message 2010/01/26

[#27860] [Bug #2663] Hard hang (needs -9 to kill) in 1.8.7 build 248 — Wayne Conrad <redmine@...>

Bug #2663: Hard hang (needs -9 to kill) in 1.8.7 build 248

2 messages 2010/01/26
[#27885] [Backport #2663](Assigned) Hard hang (needs -9 to kill) in 1.8.7 build 248 — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #2663 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#27861] [Bug #1392] Object#extend leaks memory on Ruby 1.9.1 — Jason Earl <redmine@...>

Issue #1392 has been updated by Jason Earl.

1 message 2010/01/26

[#27862] [Bug #1392] Object#extend leaks memory on Ruby 1.9.1 — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Issue #1392 has been updated by Roger Pack.

1 message 2010/01/26

[#27863] warn on printf? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Question.

2 messages 2010/01/26
[#27867] Re: warn on printf? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/01/26

[#27894] [Feature #2666] ext/curses: improved structure for view2 — Hugh Sasse <redmine@...>

Feature #2666: ext/curses: improved structure for view2

2 messages 2010/01/27
[#28082] [Feature #2666](Closed) ext/curses: improved structure for view2 — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...> 2010/02/06

Issue #2666 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.

[#27896] [Bug #2667] Segmentation fault error — Adam Jay <redmine@...>

Bug #2667: Segmentation fault error

10 messages 2010/01/27
[#28168] [Bug #2667] Segmentation fault error — Philippe Latulippe <redmine@...> 2010/02/13

Issue #2667 has been updated by Philippe Latulippe.
[#29072] [Bug #2667] Segmentation fault error — Tom Brandt <redmine@...> 2010/03/27

Issue #2667 has been updated by Tom Brandt.
[#27916] [Bug #2667] Segmentation fault error — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/28

Issue #2667 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#28647] [Bug #2667] Segmentation fault error — Philippe Latulippe <redmine@...> 2010/03/14

Issue #2667 has been updated by Philippe Latulippe.
[#27897] [Bug #2667] Segmentation fault error — Adam Jay <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #2667 has been updated by Adam Jay.
[#27954] [Bug #2667] Segmentation fault error — Adam Jay <redmine@...> 2010/01/29

Issue #2667 has been updated by Adam Jay.
[#28170] [Bug #2667] Segmentation fault error — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/02/14

Issue #2667 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#29106] [Bug #2667] Segmentation fault error — Tom Brandt <redmine@...> 2010/03/29

Issue #2667 has been updated by Tom Brandt.
[#30147] [Bug #2667](Rejected) Segmentation fault error — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/11

Issue #2667 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#27902] Ruby 1.8.7, rb_define_method and ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (0 for 1) — Gerardo Santana Gez Garrido <gerardo.santana@...>

I have the following method defined in a C extension:

6 messages 2010/01/27
[#27903] Re: Ruby 1.8.7, rb_define_method and ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (0 for 1) — Eero Saynatkari <esaynatkari@...> 2010/01/27

On 1/27/10 8:55 AM, "Gerardo Santana Gez Garrido"
[#27904] Re: Ruby 1.8.7, rb_define_method and ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (0 for 1) — Gerardo Santana Gez Garrido <gerardo.santana@...> 2010/01/27

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Eero Saynatkari
[#27906] Re: Ruby 1.8.7, rb_define_method and ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (0 for 1) — Eero Saynatkari <esaynatkari@...> 2010/01/27

On 1/27/10 9:31 AM, "Gerardo Santana Gez Garrido"
[#27908] Re: Ruby 1.8.7, rb_define_method and ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (0 for 1) — Gerardo Santana Gez Garrido <gerardo.santana@...> 2010/01/27

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Eero Saynatkari
[#27905] Re: Ruby 1.8.7, rb_define_method and ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (0 for 1) — Gerardo Santana Gez Garrido <gerardo.santana@...> 2010/01/27

I'm sorry. I must explain that the ArgumentError exception is raised

[#27912] [Bug #2669] mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2669: mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files

11 messages 2010/01/27
[#27928] [Bug #2669] mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files — Hugh Sasse <redmine@...> 2010/01/28

Issue #2669 has been updated by Hugh Sasse.
[#27914] [Bug #2669](Assigned) mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/01/28

Issue #2669 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#27932] [Bug #2669] mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/01/28

Issue #2669 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#27940] Re: [Bug #2669] mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2010/01/28

On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Luis Lavena wrote:
[#27941] Re: [Bug #2669] mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/01/28

On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> wrote:
[#27934] Re: [Bug #2669] mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/01/28

> Neither cygwin or MSYS (which is based in cygwin) likes batch files, that is one of the reasons is not marked as executable.
[#27937] Re: [Bug #2669] mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/01/28

On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@gmail.com> wrote:
[#27939] Re: [Bug #2669] mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/01/28

On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@gmail.com> wrote:
[#27942] [Bug #2669] mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files — Hugh Sasse <redmine@...> 2010/01/28

Issue #2669 has been updated by Hugh Sasse.
[#27948] [Bug #2669](Closed) mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/01/29

Issue #2669 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#27913] [Bug #2670] Net::IMAP parser problem — Tristan Seligmann <redmine@...>

Bug #2670: Net::IMAP parser problem

5 messages 2010/01/27
[#28080] [Bug #2670] Net::IMAP parser problem — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...> 2010/02/06

Issue #2670 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.
[#28091] [Bug #2670] Net::IMAP parser problem — Tristan Seligmann <redmine@...> 2010/02/06

Issue #2670 has been updated by Tristan Seligmann.
[#28099] [Bug #2670] Net::IMAP parser problem — Ryan Grove <redmine@...> 2010/02/08

Issue #2670 has been updated by Ryan Grove.
[#28325] [Bug #2670](Closed) Net::IMAP parser problem — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...> 2010/02/24

Issue #2670 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.

[#27915] [Bug #2671] File.size fails for > 2GB — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2671: File.size fails for > 2GB

2 messages 2010/01/28
[#27945] [Bug #2671](Rejected) File.size fails for > 2GB — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/01/29

Issue #2671 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#27918] [Bug #2672] backport 26395 — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2672: backport 26395

1 message 2010/01/28

[#27919] sometimes methods don't appear? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

I've noticed that with a couple of binary gems [1]

1 message 2010/01/28

[#27924] [Bug #1392] Object#extend leaks memory on Ruby 1.9.1 — Jason Earl <redmine@...>

Issue #1392 has been updated by Jason Earl.

2 messages 2010/01/28
[#27935] Re: [Bug #1392] Object#extend leaks memory on Ruby 1.9.1 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/01/28

> ./ruby -e 'loop { Module.new.include Module.new }'

[#27927] Mapping error in soap4r — "THAKUR PRASHANT SINGH" <Prashant_Singh.Thakur@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2010/01/28
[#27929] Re: Mapping error in soap4r — "THAKUR PRASHANT SINGH" <Prashant_Singh.Thakur@...> 2010/01/28

When I use my class DataOutput I get following error

[#27930] [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>

Hi jeg2, or anyone who knows the implementation of FasterCSV,

15 messages 2010/01/28
[#27931] Re: [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2010/01/28

On Jan 28, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
[#27991] Re: [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2010/02/01

Hi jeg2,
[#27993] Re: [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2010/02/01

On Feb 1, 2010, at 6:35 AM, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
[#28000] Re: [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2010/02/01

[#28001] Re: [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2010/02/01

On Feb 1, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Gary Wright wrote:
[#27992] Re: [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2010/02/01

Hi again,
[#27978] Re: [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2010/01/30

On Jan 28, 2010, at 11:13 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#27982] Re: [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/01/31

Hi,
[#27986] Re: [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2010/01/31

On Jan 31, 2010, at 4:40 AM, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
[#28009] Re: [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/02/02

Hi,
[#28010] Re: [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — Vladimir Sizikov <vsizikov@...> 2010/02/02

Hi,
[#28017] Re: [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2010/02/02

On Feb 2, 2010, at 7:18 AM, Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
[#28012] Re: [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — brian ford <brixen@...> 2010/02/02

Hi,
[#27933] [Bug #2681](Rejected) some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/01/28

Issue #2681 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#27938] [Bug #2682] Undefined method join for String (erb.rb) — awk wood <redmine@...>

Bug #2682: Undefined method join for String (erb.rb)

3 messages 2010/01/28
[#27943] [Bug #2682](Feedback) Undefined method join for String (erb.rb) — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/01/29

Issue #2682 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#28019] [Bug #2682] Undefined method join for String (erb.rb) — awk wood <redmine@...> 2010/02/02

Issue #2682 has been updated by awk wood.

[#27944] [Bug #2683] IMAP hangs when receiving an unexpected "BYE" during login — Bob Potter <redmine@...>

Bug #2683: IMAP hangs when receiving an unexpected "BYE" during login

2 messages 2010/01/29
[#28079] [Bug #2683](Closed) IMAP hangs when receiving an unexpected "BYE" during login — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...> 2010/02/06

Issue #2683 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.

[#27946] [Bug #2684] .def file is missing — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...>

Bug #2684: .def file is missing

2 messages 2010/01/29
[#27947] [Bug #2684](Closed) .def file is missing — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/01/29

Issue #2684 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#27949] [Bug #1392](Open) Object#extend leaks memory on Ruby 1.9.1 — _ wanabe <redmine@...>

Issue #1392 has been updated by _ wanabe.

1 message 2010/01/29

[#27951] [Bug #2685] Wrong call sequence example for RDoc of method flo_minus in numeric.c — red stun <redmine@...>

Bug #2685: Wrong call sequence example for RDoc of method flo_minus in numeric.c

2 messages 2010/01/29
[#27994] [Bug #2685](Closed) Wrong call sequence example for RDoc of method flo_minus in numeric.c — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/02/01

Issue #2685 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#27952] Re: Bug report for Ruby 1.9.1 — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>

2010/1/29 LAMBEAU Bernard <blambeau@gmail.com>:

1 message 2010/01/29

[#27953] [Bug #2686] Socket::gethostbyname => SEGFAULT — Vit Ondruch <redmine@...>

Bug #2686: Socket::gethostbyname => SEGFAULT

1 message 2010/01/29

[#27956] [Bug #2689] rdoc gem on 1.9.2 fails for interactive(-i) ri — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Bug #2689: rdoc gem on 1.9.2 fails for interactive(-i) ri

2 messages 2010/01/29
[#29207] [Bug #2689](Closed) rdoc gem on 1.9.2 fails for interactive(-i) ri — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2010/04/01

Issue #2689 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[#27957] [Bug #2690] IO#select unable to select for < 0.015s — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2690: IO#select unable to select for < 0.015s

5 messages 2010/01/29
[#30333] [Bug #2690](Closed) IO#select unable to select for < 0.015s — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/05/20

Issue #2690 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#30334] [Bug #2690](Assigned) IO#select unable to select for < 0.015s — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/05/20

Issue #2690 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#27996] [Bug #2690] IO#select unable to select for < 0.015s — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/02/01

Issue #2690 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#30433] [Bug #2690](Closed) IO#select unable to select for < 0.015s — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/05/26

Issue #2690 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#27958] Re: #to_enum ignores block? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

> Matz said that these methods are acceptable to be embedded into the

1 message 2010/01/29

[#27961] RCR: allow {select, collect, map} to accept symbol argument — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Background.

7 messages 2010/01/30
[#27966] Re: RCR: allow {select, collect, map} to accept symbol argument — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...> 2010/01/30

On Jan 29, 2010, at 5:14 PM, Roger Pack wrote:
[#27967] [feature:trunk] RCR: allow {select, collect, map} to accept symbol argument — Yugui <yugui@...> 2010/01/30

This reply registers the suggestion by Roger to the redmine.
[#27987] Re: [feature:trunk] RCR: allow {select, collect, map} to accept symbol argument — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/01/31

[#27988] Re: [feature:trunk] RCR: allow {select, collect, map} to accept symbol argument — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2010/02/01

On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:
[#27972] Re: [feature:trunk] RCR: allow {select, collect, map} to accept symbol argument — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/01/30

Hi,
[#28760] [Feature #2691](Rejected) RCR: allow {select, collect, map} to accept symbol argument — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/18

Issue #2691 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#27965] swallowed exception in eval — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

My apologies if this has been discussed before, but here's the situation...

3 messages 2010/01/30
[#27995] Re: swallowed exception in eval — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/02/01

> However, the backtrace output isn't that helpful.
[#28004] Re: swallowed exception in eval — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/02/02

Hi,

[#27968] [Bug #1392] Object#extend leaks memory on Ruby 1.9.1 — Jason Earl <redmine@...>

Issue #1392 has been updated by Jason Earl.

1 message 2010/01/30

[#27969] [Bug #2692] Ruby hangs after returning from rescue clause inside the block — Ilya Lopatkin <redmine@...>

Bug #2692: Ruby hangs after returning from rescue clause inside the block

3 messages 2010/01/30
[#27973] [Bug #2692] Ruby hangs after returning from rescue clause inside the block — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/01/30

Issue #2692 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#27983] [Bug #2692] Ruby hangs after returning from rescue clause inside the block — Ilya Lopatkin <redmine@...> 2010/01/31

Issue #2692 has been updated by Ilya Lopatkin.

[#27974] [Bug #2694] rake db:migrate -> error query not connected — John Bernard Abella <redmine@...>

Bug #2694: rake db:migrate -> error query not connected

3 messages 2010/01/30
[#27975] [Bug #2694] rake db:migrate -> error query not connected — John Bernard Abella <redmine@...> 2010/01/30

Issue #2694 has been updated by John Bernard Abella.
[#27976] [Bug #2694] rake db:migrate -> error query not connected — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/01/30

Issue #2694 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#27979] [Bug:trunk] [#19058] [PATCH] Fix duplicate XMLDecls and bad DocTypes in REXML::Document — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>

Hi,

1 message 2010/01/31

[#27980] [Bug #1392](Closed) Object#extend leaks memory on Ruby 1.9.1 — _ wanabe <redmine@...>

Issue #1392 has been updated by _ wanabe.

1 message 2010/01/31

[#27985] [Bug #2702] Enumerator#to_a and #to_set yield inconsistent results — Sylvain Joyeux <redmine@...>

Bug #2702: Enumerator#to_a and #to_set yield inconsistent results

2 messages 2010/01/31
[#29982] [Bug #2702] Enumerator#to_a and #to_set yield inconsistent results — Roberto Perez <redmine@...> 2010/05/03

Issue #2702 has been updated by Roberto Perez.

[ruby-core:27492] [Bug #2577] Ruby 1.9.2 Preview 1 Aborts when script/generate is used

From: Conrad Taylor <redmine@...>
Date: 2010-01-08 13:59:43 UTC
List: ruby-core #27492 
Bug #2577: Ruby 1.9.2 Preview 1 Aborts when script/generate is used
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2577

Author: Conrad Taylor
Status: Open, Priority: High
Assigned to: Koichi Sasada, Category: YARV, Target version: 1.9.2
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-07-18 trunk 24186) [powerpc-darwin9.8.0]

Hi, I'm seeing the following when issue when I attempt 

$ ruby -v
ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-07-18 trunk 24186) [powerpc-darwin9.8.0]
darnoc-desktop:blog-3.0.0 conradwt$ script/generate scaffold post title:string body:text
/Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activemodel-3.0.pre/lib/active_model/validations.rb:124: [BUG] rb_add_method: unsupported method type (8)

ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-07-18 trunk 24186) [powerpc-darwin9.8.0]

-- control frame ----------
c:0038 p:0127 s:0099 b:0099 l:000604 d:000604 CLASS  /Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activemodel-3.0.pre/lib/active_model/validations.rb:124
c:0037 p:0011 s:0097 b:0097 l:000096 d:000096 CLASS  /Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activemodel-3.0.pre/lib/active_model/validations.rb:6
c:0036 p:0045 s:0095 b:0095 l:000094 d:000094 TOP    /Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activemodel-3.0.pre/lib/active_model/validations.rb:5
c:0035 p:---- s:0093 b:0093 l:000092 d:000092 FINISH
c:0034 p:0031 s:0091 b:0090 l:000089 d:000089 CLASS  /Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activerecord-3.0.pre/lib/active_record/validations.rb:20
c:0033 p:0027 s:0088 b:0088 l:000087 d:000087 CLASS  /Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activerecord-3.0.pre/lib/active_record/validations.rb:18
c:0032 p:0009 s:0086 b:0086 l:000085 d:000085 TOP    /Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activerecord-3.0.pre/lib/active_record/validations.rb:1
c:0031 p:---- s:0084 b:0084 l:000083 d:000083 FINISH
c:0030 p:0065 s:0082 b:0081 l:000073 d:000080 BLOCK  /Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activerecord-3.0.pre/lib/active_record/base.rb:2842
c:0029 p:---- s:0079 b:0079 l:000078 d:000078 FINISH
c:0028 p:---- s:0077 b:0077 l:000076 d:000076 CFUNC  :class_eval
c:0027 p:0395 s:0074 b:0074 l:000073 d:000073 CLASS  /Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activerecord-3.0.pre/lib/active_record/base.rb:2837
c:0026 p:0189 s:0072 b:0072 l:000071 d:000071 TOP    /Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activerecord-3.0.pre/lib/active_record/base.rb:17
c:0025 p:---- s:0070 b:0070 l:000069 d:000069 FINISH
c:0024 p:0205 s:0068 b:0066 l:000065 d:000065 TOP    /Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activerecord-3.0.pre/lib/active_record.rb:142
c:0023 p:---- s:0062 b:0062 l:000061 d:000061 FINISH
c:0022 p:---- s:0060 b:0060 l:000059 d:000059 CFUNC  :require
c:0021 p:0011 s:0056 b:0056 l:000055 d:000055 TOP    /Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activerecord-3.0.pre/lib/active_record/railtie.rb:5
c:0020 p:---- s:0054 b:0054 l:000053 d:000053 FINISH
c:0019 p:---- s:0052 b:0052 l:000051 d:000051 CFUNC  :require
c:0018 p:0021 s:0048 b:0048 l:000039 d:000047 BLOCK  /Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/railties-3.0.pre/lib/rails/all.rb:12
c:0017 p:---- s:0045 b:0045 l:000044 d:000044 FINISH
c:0016 p:---- s:0043 b:0043 l:000042 d:000042 CFUNC  :each
c:0015 p:0034 s:0040 b:0040 l:000039 d:000039 TOP    /Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/railties-3.0.pre/lib/rails/all.rb:5
c:0014 p:---- s:0038 b:0038 l:000037 d:000037 FINISH
c:0013 p:---- s:0036 b:0036 l:000035 d:000035 CFUNC  :require
c:0012 p:0150 s:0032 b:0032 l:000031 d:000031 TOP    /Users/conradwt/rails.dir/examples/blog-3.0.0/config/boot.rb:16
c:0011 p:---- s:0028 b:0028 l:000027 d:000027 FINISH
c:0010 p:---- s:0026 b:0026 l:000025 d:000025 CFUNC  :require
c:0009 p:0026 s:0022 b:0022 l:000021 d:000021 TOP    /Users/conradwt/rails.dir/examples/blog-3.0.0/config/application.rb:1
c:0008 p:---- s:0020 b:0020 l:000019 d:000019 FINISH
c:0007 p:---- s:0018 b:0018 l:000017 d:000017 CFUNC  :require
c:0006 p:0026 s:0014 b:0014 l:000013 d:000013 TOP    /Users/conradwt/rails.dir/examples/blog-3.0.0/config/environment.rb:2
c:0005 p:---- s:0012 b:0012 l:000011 d:000011 FINISH
c:0004 p:---- s:0010 b:0010 l:000009 d:000009 CFUNC  :require
c:0003 p:0026 s:0006 b:0006 l:0012d4 d:0011e4 EVAL   script/generate:2
c:0002 p:---- s:0004 b:0004 l:000003 d:000003 FINISH
c:0001 p:0000 s:0002 b:0002 l:0012d4 d:0012d4 TOP   
---------------------------
-- Ruby level backtrace information-----------------------------------------
script/generate:2:in `<main>'
script/generate:2:in `require'
/Users/conradwt/rails.dir/examples/blog-3.0.0/config/environment.rb:2:in `<top (required)>'
/Users/conradwt/rails.dir/examples/blog-3.0.0/config/environment.rb:2:in `require'
/Users/conradwt/rails.dir/examples/blog-3.0.0/config/application.rb:1:in `<top (required)>'
/Users/conradwt/rails.dir/examples/blog-3.0.0/config/application.rb:1:in `require'
/Users/conradwt/rails.dir/examples/blog-3.0.0/config/boot.rb:16:in `<top (required)>'
/Users/conradwt/rails.dir/examples/blog-3.0.0/config/boot.rb:16:in `require'
/Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/railties-3.0.pre/lib/rails/all.rb:5:in `<top (required)>'
/Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/railties-3.0.pre/lib/rails/all.rb:5:in `each'
/Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/railties-3.0.pre/lib/rails/all.rb:12:in `block in <top (required)>'
/Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/railties-3.0.pre/lib/rails/all.rb:12:in `require'
/Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activerecord-3.0.pre/lib/active_record/railtie.rb:5:in `<top (required)>'
/Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activerecord-3.0.pre/lib/active_record/railtie.rb:5:in `require'
/Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activerecord-3.0.pre/lib/active_record.rb:142:in `<top (required)>'
/Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activerecord-3.0.pre/lib/active_record/base.rb:17:in `<top (required)>'
/Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activerecord-3.0.pre/lib/active_record/base.rb:2837:in `<module:ActiveRecord>'
/Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activerecord-3.0.pre/lib/active_record/base.rb:2837:in `class_eval'
/Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activerecord-3.0.pre/lib/active_record/base.rb:2842:in `block in <module:ActiveRecord>'
/Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activerecord-3.0.pre/lib/active_record/validations.rb:1:in `<top (required)>'
/Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activerecord-3.0.pre/lib/active_record/validations.rb:18:in `<module:ActiveRecord>'
/Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activerecord-3.0.pre/lib/active_record/validations.rb:20:in `<module:Validations>'
/Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activemodel-3.0.pre/lib/active_model/validations.rb:5:in `<top (required)>'
/Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activemodel-3.0.pre/lib/active_model/validations.rb:6:in `<module:ActiveModel>'
/Users/conradwt/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-preview1/gems/activemodel-3.0.pre/lib/active_model/validations.rb:124:in `<module:Validations>'

-- C level backtrace information -------------------------------------------
0   libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0038d118 rb_vm_bugreport + 264
1   libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x002696fc rb_compile_warn + 444
2   libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x002697c8 rb_bug + 88
3   libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0038a324 rb_alias + 548
4   libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0038a45c rb_alias + 860
5   libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00377e88 rb_thread_alloc + 744
6   libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037c210 rb_raise_method_missing + 816
7   libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037f838 rb_raise_method_missing + 14680
8   libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0038419c rb_raise_method_missing + 33468
9   libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00384a34 rb_iseq_eval + 372
10  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026ebe4 rb_get_load_path + 964
11  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026ff50 rb_require_safe + 1360
12  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0035bc84 rb_autoload_load + 148
13  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0035bd10 rb_autoload_load + 288
14  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037d420 rb_raise_method_missing + 5440
15  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0038419c rb_raise_method_missing + 33468
16  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00384a34 rb_iseq_eval + 372
17  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026ebe4 rb_get_load_path + 964
18  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026ff50 rb_require_safe + 1360
19  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0035bc84 rb_autoload_load + 148
20  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037d2e4 rb_raise_method_missing + 5124
21  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0038419c rb_raise_method_missing + 33468
22  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00387af8 rb_yield + 2888
23  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00387d40 rb_mod_module_exec + 176
24  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00377e88 rb_thread_alloc + 744
25  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037c210 rb_raise_method_missing + 816
26  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037f838 rb_raise_method_missing + 14680
27  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0038419c rb_raise_method_missing + 33468
28  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00384a34 rb_iseq_eval + 372
29  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026ebe4 rb_get_load_path + 964
30  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026ff50 rb_require_safe + 1360
31  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0035bc84 rb_autoload_load + 148
32  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0035bd10 rb_autoload_load + 288
33  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037d420 rb_raise_method_missing + 5440
34  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0038419c rb_raise_method_missing + 33468
35  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00384a34 rb_iseq_eval + 372
36  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026ebe4 rb_get_load_path + 964
37  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026ff50 rb_require_safe + 1360
38  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00377e88 rb_thread_alloc + 744
39  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037c210 rb_raise_method_missing + 816
40  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037f838 rb_raise_method_missing + 14680
41  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0038419c rb_raise_method_missing + 33468
42  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00384a34 rb_iseq_eval + 372
43  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026ebe4 rb_get_load_path + 964
44  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026ff50 rb_require_safe + 1360
45  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00377e88 rb_thread_alloc + 744
46  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037c210 rb_raise_method_missing + 816
47  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037f838 rb_raise_method_missing + 14680
48  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0038419c rb_raise_method_missing + 33468
49  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x003873d4 rb_yield + 1060
50  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00234374 rb_ary_each + 116
51  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00377e88 rb_thread_alloc + 744
52  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037c210 rb_raise_method_missing + 816
53  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037f838 rb_raise_method_missing + 14680
54  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0038419c rb_raise_method_missing + 33468
55  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00384a34 rb_iseq_eval + 372
56  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026ebe4 rb_get_load_path + 964
57  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026ff50 rb_require_safe + 1360
58  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00377e88 rb_thread_alloc + 744
59  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037c210 rb_raise_method_missing + 816
60  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037f838 rb_raise_method_missing + 14680
61  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0038419c rb_raise_method_missing + 33468
62  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00384a34 rb_iseq_eval + 372
63  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026ebe4 rb_get_load_path + 964
64  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026ff50 rb_require_safe + 1360
65  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00377e88 rb_thread_alloc + 744
66  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037c210 rb_raise_method_missing + 816
67  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037f838 rb_raise_method_missing + 14680
68  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0038419c rb_raise_method_missing + 33468
69  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00384a34 rb_iseq_eval + 372
70  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026ebe4 rb_get_load_path + 964
71  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026ff50 rb_require_safe + 1360
72  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00377e88 rb_thread_alloc + 744
73  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037c210 rb_raise_method_missing + 816
74  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037f838 rb_raise_method_missing + 14680
75  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0038419c rb_raise_method_missing + 33468
76  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00384a34 rb_iseq_eval + 372
77  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026ebe4 rb_get_load_path + 964
78  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026ff50 rb_require_safe + 1360
79  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x00377e88 rb_thread_alloc + 744
80  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037c210 rb_raise_method_missing + 816
81  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0037f838 rb_raise_method_missing + 14680
82  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0038419c rb_raise_method_missing + 33468
83  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x003848a8 rb_iseq_eval_main + 520
84  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026b1bc ruby_exec_node + 156
85  libruby.1.9.1.dylib                 0x0026e088 ruby_run_node + 72
86  ruby                                0x00001f78 main + 88
87  ruby                                0x00001ec4 start + 68
88  ruby                                0x00001000 _mh_execute_header + 0

[NOTE]
You may have encountered a bug in the Ruby interpreter or extension libraries.
Bug reports are welcome.
For details: http://www.ruby-lang.org/bugreport.html

Abort trap


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next