[#27380] [Bug #2553] Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls — Dan Peterson <redmine@...>

Bug #2553: Fix pthreads slowness by eliminating unnecessary sigprocmask calls

21 messages 2010/01/03

[#27437] [Feature #2561] 1.8.7 Patch reduces time cost of Rational operations by 50%. — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...>

Feature #2561: 1.8.7 Patch reduces time cost of Rational operations by 50%.

9 messages 2010/01/06

[#27447] [Bug #2564] [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork — Aliaksey Kandratsenka <redmine@...>

Bug #2564: [patch] re-initialize timer_thread_{lock,cond} after fork

18 messages 2010/01/06

[#27545] [Feature #2594] 1.8.7 Patch: Reduce time spent in gc.c is_pointer_to_heap(). — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...>

Feature #2594: 1.8.7 Patch: Reduce time spent in gc.c is_pointer_to_heap().

8 messages 2010/01/11

[#27635] [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #2619: Proposed method: Process.fork_supported?

45 messages 2010/01/20
[#27643] [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/01/21

Issue #2619 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#27678] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/22

Hi,

[#27684] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/01/22

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#27708] Re: [Feature #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/01/22

Hi,

[#27646] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/21

2010/1/21 Hongli Lai <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:

[#27652] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2010/01/21

On 1/21/10 5:20 AM, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#27653] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/01/21

2010/1/21 Hongli Lai <hongli@plan99.net>:

[#27662] Re: [Bug #2619] Proposed method: Process.fork_supported? — Vladimir Sizikov <vsizikov@...> 2010/01/21

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:

[#27698] [Bug #2629] ConditionVariable#wait(mutex, timeout) should return whether the condition was signalled, not the waited time — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #2629: ConditionVariable#wait(mutex, timeout) should return whether the condition was signalled, not the waited time

8 messages 2010/01/22

[#27722] [Feature #2635] Unbundle rdoc — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Feature #2635: Unbundle rdoc

14 messages 2010/01/23

[#27757] [Bug #2638] ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located. — Joel Soete <redmine@...>

Bug #2638: ruby-1.9.1-p37[68] build on aix5.3 with gcc-4.2 failed to run for me because it ignores where libgcc is located.

10 messages 2010/01/24

[#27778] [Bug #2641] Seg fault running miniruby during ruby build on Haiku — Alexander von Gluck <redmine@...>

Bug #2641: Seg fault running miniruby during ruby build on Haiku

10 messages 2010/01/25

[#27791] [Bug #2644] memory over-allocation with regexp — Greg Hazel <redmine@...>

Bug #2644: memory over-allocation with regexp

12 messages 2010/01/25

[#27794] [Bug #2647] Lack of testing for String#split — Hugh Sasse <redmine@...>

Bug #2647: Lack of testing for String#split

14 messages 2010/01/25

[#27912] [Bug #2669] mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2669: mkmf find_executable doesn't find .bat files

11 messages 2010/01/27

[#27930] [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>

Hi jeg2, or anyone who knows the implementation of FasterCSV,

15 messages 2010/01/28
[#27931] Re: [Bug:trunk] some behavior changes of lib/csv.rb between 1.8 and 1.9 — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2010/01/28

On Jan 28, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:

[ruby-core:27516] [Bug #2588] Forced definition of stati64 and _stati64 under MinGW

From: Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Date: 2010-01-10 09:27:12 UTC
List: ruby-core #27516
Bug #2588: Forced definition of stati64 and _stati64 under MinGW
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2588

Author: Luis Lavena
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
Category: build, Target version: 1.9.x
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.1p376 (2009-12-07 revision 26041) [i386-mingw32]

Appears that stati64 and _stati64 definition is being forced for non-MS compilers:

<pre><code>
#if defined(__BORLANDC__)
#define stati64(path, st) rb_w32_stati64(path, st)
#elif !defined(_MSC_VER) || RT_VER < 80
#define stati64 _stati64
#define _stati64(path, st) rb_w32_stati64(path, st)
#else
#define stati64 _stat64
#define _stat64(path, st) rb_w32_stati64(path, st)
#define _fstati64 _fstat64
#endif
</code></pre>

Generating the following error during compilation:

<pre>
In file included from ../include/ruby/defines.h:205:0,
                 from ../include/ruby/ruby.h:73,
                 from ../include/ruby.h:32,
                 from ../main.c:13:
../include/ruby/win32.h:182:0: warning: "_stati64" redefined
c:/msys/system64/lib/gcc/../../x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/sys/stat.h:71:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
../include/ruby/win32.h:181:17: warning: 'struct _stati64' declared inside parameter list
../include/ruby/win32.h:181:17: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
gcc -O3 -g -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-parentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-long-long -I. -I.ext/include/x86_64-mingw32 -I../include -I.. -DRUBY_EXPORT   -o dln.o -c ../dln.c
In file included from ../include/ruby/defines.h:205:0,
                 from ../include/ruby/ruby.h:73,
                 from ../dln.c:13:
../include/ruby/win32.h:182:0: warning: "_stati64" redefined
c:/msys/system64/lib/gcc/../../x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/sys/stat.h:71:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
../include/ruby/win32.h:181:17: warning: 'struct _stati64' declared inside parameter list
../include/ruby/win32.h:181:17: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
In file included from ../include/ruby/defines.h:205:0,
                 from ../include/ruby/ruby.h:73,
                 from ../dln.c:13:
../include/ruby/win32.h: In function 'dln_find_1':
../dln.c:1551:17: error: storage size of 'st' isn't known
make: *** [dln.o] Error 1
</pre>

Seems that latest MinGW defines stati64 properly in sys/stat.h, according to this MSDN article:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/14h5k7ff(VS.71).aspx

The following is the output of compiled GCC code for 32 and 64 bits:

Luis@KEORE ~/Desktop
$ gcc -m32 crt_stat.c -o crt_stat32.exe

Luis@KEORE ~/Desktop
$ gcc crt_stat.c -o crt_stat64.exe

Luis@KEORE ~/Desktop
$ crt_stat32.exe
File size     : 698
Drive         : C:
Time modified : Sun Jan 10 06:19:17 2010

Luis@KEORE ~/Desktop
$ crt_stat64.exe
File size     : 698
Drive         : C:
Time modified : Sun Jan 10 06:19:17 2010

Which indicates the problem is not the function, but maybe some incompatibility with Ruby itself?

Please, if possible, let me know any other detail to understand this implementation so I can provide a patch for it.

Thank you.


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next