From: Tetsu Soh <tetsu.soh.dev@...>
Date: 2010-01-22T14:57:08+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:27680] Re: A patch to rdoc

Thanks for the information.
It seems that I am out of date.

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Eric Hodel" <drbrain@segment7.net>
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 6:17 AM
To: <ruby-core@ruby-lang.org>
Subject: [ruby-core:27667] Re: A patch to rdoc

> On Jan 21, 2010, at 02:36, Tetsu Soh wrote:
>> I made a patch to rdoc -- just 3 lines -- which makes the rdoc(generating 
>> html) run faster and use less memory.
>> I listed the test result in the below.
>>
>> (Tested on 32 bits Linux, Ruby1.9.2-trunk, 4GB memory, Intel Quad 2.6GHz)
>> Using rdoc to process whole lib directory:
>> original : 15 minutes, 1.3GB memory
>> patched: 7 minutes, 65MB memory
>
> The latest RDoc no longer has the HTML generator at all.  I fixed this 
> memory issue by deleting the file.
>
> The Darkfish generator that replaced it has approximately the same memory 
> and time footprint as your patch compared to the HTML generator but with 
> significantly less code to maintain.
>