[#8787] Literal inconsistency — Calamitas <calamitates@...>
Hi,
Calamitas <calamitates@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/4/06, Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> wrote:
[#8794] bignums — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>
I want ask how look integration of faster bignums.
[#8798] okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>
We have previously talked about getting the sandbox to obey thread switching on
Hi,
[#8802] WEBrick::Cookie support for multiple cookies per set-cookie — Aaron Patterson <aaron_patterson@...>
WEBrick's cookie class has a method for parsing Set-Cookie headers, but
[#8813] ruby-1.8.5 loads fox16.so more than once — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #5701, was opened at 2006-09-08 20:59
[#8815] Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>
Howdy,
On Sep 8, 2006, at 10:10 PM, Sean E. Russell wrote:
On Saturday 09 September 2006 01:42, Eric Hodel wrote:
On Sep 9, 2006, at 7:16 PM, Sean E. Russell wrote:
On Sunday 10 September 2006 22:57, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#8826] OptionParser < Hash — "greg weber" <eegreg@...>
Hi,
[#8828] REXML fails to parse UTF-16 XML. — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #5711, was opened at 2006-09-11 01:25
Hi,
[#8861] new changes in strings+symbols — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, matz wrote:
[#8864] documentation of ruby internals — Deni George <denigeorge@...>
Hello
On Thursday 14 September 2006 11:30, Deni George wrote:
[#8885] numeric.c fails to build on 64-bit platforms (Fedora Core 5 x86_64 gcc 4.1.1) — <noreply@...>
Patches item #5774, was opened at 2006-09-16 12:19
Hi,
[#8897] Ruby's 'etc' module cannot handle the UID of OS X 'nobody' properly — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #5822, was opened at 2006-09-20 11:13
Hi,
[#8904] patch bignums — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>
I am so far with implementing faster bignums:
[#8920] rdoc capture output (help message) — "greg weber" <eegreg@...>
Hi,
The simplest command line would be
greg weber wrote:
It looks like you could seperate this out into a rake task, but then
On Sep 29, 2006, at 5:52 AM, greg weber wrote:
[#8929] Re: RDoc patch, possible bug in socket.c for TCPSocket.new — gwtmp01@...
[#8948] socket (and many others) not building on osx? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I'm stumped. A brand new clean build doesn't build socket.
[#8954] The %? .. ? Operator — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
I'm needing to know the full list of characters that can (or cannot)
On Sep 29, 2006, at 9:56 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
Re: RDoc patch, possible bug in socket.c for TCPSocket.new
gwtmp01@mac.com wrote: > > On Sep 26, 2006, at 3:26 PM, Daniel Berger wrote: >> Also, I think there's a bug with the local connection not closing >> properly. >> The local connection appears to go into a TIME_WAIT, and it looks to >> me like >> it's the OS that finally closes it out. Here's a short program to >> demonstrate: > > This is the normal behavior for a TCP session. After the server sends the > final ACK to the client, the TCP session must remain in the TIME_WAIT state > for twice the maximum segment lifetime. The delay is to handle lost acks, > or stray duplicate segments that arrive after the session has been > closed. It > is the kernel that takes care of this housekeeping. > > See Stevens, TCP/IP Illustrated V1 p 242 for details. Ok, thanks. >> Also, if I try to connect while it's in a TIME_WAIT state, I get this: >> >> tcpsocket.rb:5:in `initialize': Address family not supported by protocol >> family - bind(2) (Errno::EAFNOSUPPORT) >> from tcpsocket.rb:5 > > Is this an error from the client trying to connect to the server in the > TIME_WAIT > state or is this the error you are getting from the server trying to > restart and > bind and reuse the local port that is still in the TIME_WAIT state? I get that error if I try to run the same script again before the OS has closed the connection. I'm expecting an error, just not *that* error. It's not a major issue, mind you. I just thought it was odd. > You use of the word 'connect' is a bit confusing since that is not > generally used > to describe the behavior of a TCP server. I'm not sure where you mean? In my rdoc patch? I'm sure it could use improvement - I'm hoping people on the list can improve the wording. Regards, Dan PS - My apologies for the corporate disclaimer. I'll try to setup my gmail account through my email client at work. Hopefully, I'll be able to post without the disclaimer and the sucky formatting. This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.