[#8815] Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Howdy,

12 messages 2006/09/09
[#8817] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/09

On Sep 8, 2006, at 10:10 PM, Sean E. Russell wrote:

Re: new changes in strings+symbols

From: Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
Date: 2006-09-17 16:43:22 UTC
List: ruby-core #8886
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: new changes in strings+symbols"
>     on Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:12:35 +0900, MenTaLguY <mental@rydia.net> writes:
>
> |Another problem when implementing languages atop Ruby are the
> |"synonymous" symbols for unary operators -- e.g. :!, :"!@",
> |and :"!(unary)".  Could these be differentiated somehow?
>
> OK, let me consider.  Perhaps moving unification process after intern
> should work.

Or even drop it?  What is it good for?

> 							matz.
-- 
Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen@gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org

In This Thread

Prev Next