ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#8768] Thread#kill! patch — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

Wow, MenTaLguY has worked up a patch[1] to ruby-1.8.5 and ruby_1_8 branch for

3 messages 2006/09/01

[#8772] Re: Thread#kill! patch — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2006/09/01

On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 09:19 +0900, why the lucky stiff wrote:

[#8809] Re: Thread#kill! patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/08

Hi,

[#8770] socks_init in ruby/ext/socket/socket.c — Sven Klemm <sven@...3d2.de>

Hi,

2 messages 2006/09/01

[#8771] Re: [PATCH] socks_init in ruby/ext/socket/socket.c — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/01

Hi,

[#8774] suprising benchmark — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>

I wondered what gives you optimalization

3 messages 2006/09/02

[#8775] Re: suprising benchmark — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/02

On Sep 2, 2006, at 2:18 AM, Ondrej Bilka wrote:

[#8781] Re: suprising benchmark — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2006/09/03

On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 07:21:30PM +0200, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#8787] Literal inconsistency — Calamitas <calamitates@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2006/09/04

[#8788] Re: Literal inconsistency — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/04

Hi,

[#8789] Re: Literal inconsistency — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2006/09/04

Calamitas <calamitates@gmail.com> writes:

[#8790] Re: Literal inconsistency — Calamitas <calamitates@...> 2006/09/04

On 9/4/06, Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> wrote:

[#8791] Re: Literal inconsistency — URABE Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2006/09/04

Hi,

[#8792] Re: Literal inconsistency — Calamitas <calamitates@...> 2006/09/04

On 9/4/06, URABE Shyouhei <shyouhei@ice.uec.ac.jp> wrote:

[#8800] Re: Literal inconsistency — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/09/05

On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Calamitas wrote:

[#8793] Re: Literal inconsistency — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/09/04

On 9/4/06, Calamitas <calamitates@gmail.com> wrote:

[#8794] bignums — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>

I want ask how look integration of faster bignums.

7 messages 2006/09/04

[#8801] Re: bignums — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/09/05

On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Ondrej Bilka wrote:

[#8819] Re: bignums — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2006/09/09

On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 12:12:12AM +0200, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#8822] Re: bignums — nobu@... 2006/09/10

Hi,

[#8825] Re: bignums — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2006/09/10

On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 05:05:22AM +0200, nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:

[#8882] Re: bignums — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/09/15

On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Ondrej Bilka wrote:

[#8795] Re: bignums — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/04

Hello,

[#8796] gem_server fails with getnameinfo: ai_family not supported — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5627, was opened at 2006-09-05 00:48

2 messages 2006/09/05

[#8797] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5627 ] gem_server fails with getnameinfo: ai_family not supported — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/05

On Sep 4, 2006, at 10:48 PM, <noreply@rubyforge.org>

[#8798] okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

We have previously talked about getting the sandbox to obey thread switching on

9 messages 2006/09/05

[#8808] Re: okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/08

Hi,

[#8811] Re: okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/09/08

On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 02:22:48PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8812] Re: okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/08

Hi,

[#8839] Re: okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/09/11

[#8917] Re: okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/09/25

Hi,

[#8923] Re: okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/09/25

On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 01:56:58PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#8925] Re: okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/09/26

Hi,

[#8939] Re: okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2006/09/27

Hello,

[#8802] WEBrick::Cookie support for multiple cookies per set-cookie — Aaron Patterson <aaron_patterson@...>

WEBrick's cookie class has a method for parsing Set-Cookie headers, but

3 messages 2006/09/06

[#8805] Re: [PATCH] WEBrick::Cookie support for multiple cookies per set-cookie — GOTOU Yuuzou <gotoyuzo@...> 2006/09/08

In message <20060906023817.GA13370@eviladmins.lan>,

[#8824] Re: [PATCH] WEBrick::Cookie support for multiple cookies per set-cookie — Aaron Patterson <aaron_patterson@...> 2006/09/10

On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:10:51AM +0900, GOTOU Yuuzou wrote:

[#8803] Fix: no black boxes in rdoc diagrams anymore — "Florian Frank" <flori@...>

Hi,

1 message 2006/09/06

[#8804] Emacs ruby-mode: here-doc indentation & more — "Marshall T. Vandegrift" <llasram@...>

2 messages 2006/09/06

[#8854] Re: [PATCH] Emacs ruby-mode: here-doc indentation & more — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/13

Hi,

[#8806] loginfo during check-in — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Heya,

2 messages 2006/09/08

[#8807] Re: loginfo during check-in — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/08

Hi,

[#8810] Server maintenance — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>

Hi,

1 message 2006/09/08

[#8813] ruby-1.8.5 loads fox16.so more than once — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5701, was opened at 2006-09-08 20:59

4 messages 2006/09/09

[#8814] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5701 ] ruby-1.8.5 loads fox16.so more than once — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/09

On Sep 8, 2006, at 7:00 PM, <noreply@rubyforge.org> wrote:

[#8820] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5701 ] ruby-1.8.5 loads fox16.so more than once — "Lyle Johnson" <lyle.johnson@...> 2006/09/09

On 9/8/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:

[#8823] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5701 ] ruby-1.8.5 loads fox16.so more than once — nobu@... 2006/09/10

Hi,

[#8815] Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Howdy,

12 messages 2006/09/09

[#8817] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/09

On Sep 8, 2006, at 10:10 PM, Sean E. Russell wrote:

[#8821] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2006/09/10

On Saturday 09 September 2006 01:42, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#8830] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/10

On Sep 9, 2006, at 7:16 PM, Sean E. Russell wrote:

[#8837] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2006/09/11

On Sunday 10 September 2006 22:57, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#8880] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Vincent Fourmond <vincent.fourmond@9online.fr> 2006/09/15

> One is NEVER allowed to assume that a pointer can be stored in an arithmetic

[#8881] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2006/09/15

On Friday 15 September 2006 16:46, Vincent Fourmond wrote:

[#8883] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2006/09/15

Marc Haisenko wrote:

[#8841] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/09/11

On Monday 11 September 2006 03:58, Marc Haisenko wrote:

[#8848] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/11

On Sep 11, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Sean Russell wrote:

[#8840] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/09/11

On Sunday 10 September 2006 16:57, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#8818] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/09

[#8826] OptionParser < Hash — "greg weber" <eegreg@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2006/09/10

[#8827] Re: [PATCH] OptionParser < Hash — "greg weber" <eegreg@...> 2006/09/10

Think I forgot to attach the patch.

[#8831] Re: [PATCH] OptionParser < Hash — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/09/11

Hi,

[#8834] Re: [PATCH] OptionParser < Hash — "greg weber" <eegreg@...> 2006/09/11

> OptionParser's methods are partioned to 2 kinds. Methods to register

[#8846] Re: [PATCH] OptionParser < Hash — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/11

On Sep 10, 2006, at 11:03 PM, greg weber wrote:

[#8835] Re: [PATCH] OptionParser < Hash — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/09/11

Hi,

[#8856] Re: [PATCH] OptionParser < Hash — "greg weber" <eegreg@...> 2006/09/13

This is great, Nobu!

[#8858] Re: [PATCH] OptionParser < Hash — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/09/13

Hi,

[#8828] REXML fails to parse UTF-16 XML. — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5711, was opened at 2006-09-11 01:25

6 messages 2006/09/10

[#8833] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5711 ] REXML fails to parse UTF-16 XML. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/11

Hi,

[#8842] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5711 ] REXML fails to parse UTF-16 XML. — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/09/11

On Sunday 10 September 2006 22:45, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8843] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5711 ] REXML fails to parse UTF-16 XML. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/11

Hi,

[#8844] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5711 ] REXML fails to parse UTF-16 XML. — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/09/11

On Monday 11 September 2006 12:59, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8845] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5711 ] REXML fails to parse UTF-16 XML. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/11

Hi,

[#8829] require 'rdoc/usage' fails on ppc — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5712, was opened at 2006-09-10 18:06

3 messages 2006/09/10

[#8832] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5712 ] require 'rdoc/usage' fails on ppc — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/11

Hi,

[#8853] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5712 ] require 'rdoc/usage' fails on ppc — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2006/09/13

On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 10:46 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8836] YAML errors with indentation indicator — "Akira FUNAI" <funai.akira@...>

Hi,

1 message 2006/09/11

[#8838] rdoc with optparse — "greg weber" <eegreg@...>

This is a patch to allow rdoc to read the help message from optparse,

3 messages 2006/09/11

[#8847] Re: [PATCH] rdoc with optparse — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/11

On Sep 11, 2006, at 4:19 AM, greg weber wrote:

[#8849] Re: [PATCH] rdoc with optparse — "greg weber" <eegreg@...> 2006/09/11

sorry, diff is attached.

[#8850] constants (rcrs 178, 343,345) — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>

I looked at my rcr 343 and 345. Could you give me some feedback?

1 message 2006/09/12

[#8851] README.EXT -- English adjustments. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

I've been looking at README.EXT and thought I could make the English

1 message 2006/09/12

[#8852] Re: README.EXT -- English adjustments. — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2006/09/12

[#8855] Re: README.EXT -- English adjustments. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/09/13

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#8857] RDOC doesn't show string "#" or "\#" — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5740, was opened at 2006-09-13 11:55

1 message 2006/09/13

[#8859] (test/unit) assert_raise without parameters should check if any exception is being raised — <noreply@...>

Patches item #5748, was opened at 2006-09-13 19:34

1 message 2006/09/13

[#8860] Date._parse doesn't understand hour only time, e.g. 2pm — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5752, was opened at 2006-09-14 10:40

1 message 2006/09/13

[#8861] new changes in strings+symbols — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, matz wrote:

5 messages 2006/09/14

[#8863] Re: new changes in strings+symbols — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/14

Hi,

[#8872] Re: new changes in strings+symbols — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2006/09/14

On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 16:34 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8879] Re: new changes in strings+symbols — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/15

Hi,

[#8886] Re: new changes in strings+symbols — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2006/09/17

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#8862] ruby-1.8 CVS make check fails — ville.mattila@...

1 message 2006/09/14

[#8864] documentation of ruby internals — Deni George <denigeorge@...>

Hello

11 messages 2006/09/14

[#8865] Re: documentation of ruby internals — "A. S. Bradbury" <asbradbury@...> 2006/09/14

On Thursday 14 September 2006 11:30, Deni George wrote:

[#8870] Re: documentation of ruby internals — Mike Dvorkin <mike@...> 2006/09/14

You can use Google translation to read the original. It produces

[#8871] Re: documentation of ruby internals — Deni George <denigeorge@...> 2006/09/14

thank you

[#8867] Re: documentation of ruby internals — Deni George <denigeorge@...> 2006/09/14

Thanx Alex .

[#8873] Re: documentation of ruby internals — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/14

On Sep 14, 2006, at 4:38 AM, Deni George wrote:

[#8866] Re: documentation of ruby internals — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/09/14

On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Deni George wrote:

[#8868] Re: documentation of ruby internals — Deni George <denigeorge@...> 2006/09/14

Hugh Sasse wrote:

[#8869] Re: documentation of ruby internals — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/09/14

On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Deni George wrote:

[#8877] Re: documentation of ruby internals — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/09/15

On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Deni George wrote:

[#8878] Re: documentation of ruby internals — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/09/15

On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 05:05:58PM +0900, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#8874] Problem with generated soap requests / classes using the WSDL Tools — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5763, was opened at 2006-09-14 17:52

1 message 2006/09/14

[#8875] Ruby Hackers Guide Translations — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

I have a full machine translation of Ruby Hackers Guide

2 messages 2006/09/15

[#8876] Re: Ruby Hackers Guide Translations — dreamhead <dreamhead.cn@...> 2006/09/15

Maybe this message should be sent to rhg (the project that translates

[#8884] Curses problem — "Overdorf, Sam" <sam.overdorf@...>

I have been trying to use the "Curses" library and am having the

1 message 2006/09/16

[#8885] numeric.c fails to build on 64-bit platforms (Fedora Core 5 x86_64 gcc 4.1.1) — <noreply@...>

Patches item #5774, was opened at 2006-09-16 12:19

4 messages 2006/09/16

[#8887] Re: [ ruby-Patches-5774 ] numeric.c fails to build on 64-bit platforms (Fedora Core 5 x86_64 gcc 4.1.1) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/18

Hi,

[#8893] Re: [ ruby-Patches-5774 ] numeric.c fails to build on 64-bit platforms (Fedora Core 5 x86_64 gcc 4.1.1) — Tadashi Saito <shiba@...2.accsnet.ne.jp> 2006/09/18

Hi all,

[#8895] Re: [ ruby-Patches-5774 ] numeric.c fails to build on 64-bit platforms (Fedora Core 5 x86_64 gcc 4.1.1) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/09/18

Hi,

[#8888] 1.9 build failure. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

Testing a patch (nowhere near digest) against the latest 1.9 on Sun

4 messages 2006/09/18

[#8889] Re: 1.9 build failure. — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/09/18

Hi,

[#8890] Re: 1.9 build failure. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/09/18

On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#8891] Re: 1.9 build failure. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/18

Hi,

[#8892] Getting docs out of README.EXT — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

I've been trying to find the easiest way to get README.EXT into

2 messages 2006/09/18

[#8894] Re: Getting docs out of README.EXT — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/18

On Sep 18, 2006, at 7:54 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:

[#8896] FXRI/IRB - Shift + Backspace crashes help viewer — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5821, was opened at 2006-09-20 11:59

1 message 2006/09/20

[#8897] Ruby's 'etc' module cannot handle the UID of OS X 'nobody' properly — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5822, was opened at 2006-09-20 11:13

5 messages 2006/09/20

[#8900] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5822 ] Ruby's 'etc' module cannot handle the UID of OS X 'nobody' properly — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/21

Hi,

[#8901] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5822 ] Ruby's 'etc' module cannot handle the UID of OS X 'nobody' properly — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...> 2006/09/21

On 9/20/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#8902] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5822 ] Ruby's 'etc' module cannot handle the UID of OS X 'nobody' properly — Jim Freeze <jimfreeze@...> 2006/09/21

On Sep 20, 2006, at 8:30 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8903] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5822 ] Ruby's 'etc' module cannot handle the UID of OS X 'nobody' properly — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/21

Hi,

[#8898] Typo in example comment for recent string.c v 1.274 commit — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2006/09/21

[#8899] Re: Typo in example comment for recent string.c v 1.274 commit — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/21

Hi,

[#8904] patch bignums — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>

I am so far with implementing faster bignums:

7 messages 2006/09/21

[#8905] Re: patch bignums — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/09/21

Hi,

[#8910] Re: patch bignums — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2006/09/22

On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 06:30:49PM +0200, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#8906] Re: patch bignums — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/09/21

> -----Original Message-----

[#8909] Re: patch bignums — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/22

Hi,

[#8907] Re: patch bignums — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/09/21

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 01:30:49AM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#8908] Re: patch bignums — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/09/22

Hi,

[#8911] Typo in documentation of Kernel#rand — <noreply@...>

Patches item #5869, was opened at 2006-09-23 14:25

1 message 2006/09/23

[#8912] NODE_POSTEXE / gc — ts <decoux@...>

3 messages 2006/09/24

[#8918] Re: NODE_POSTEXE / gc — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/25

Hi,

[#8931] Re: NODE_POSTEXE / gc — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/09/26

On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, ts wrote:

[#8913] Dir.chroot and '/' — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5884, was opened at 2006-09-24 18:54

3 messages 2006/09/25

[#8919] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5884 ] Dir.chroot and '/' — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/09/25

Hi,

[#8921] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5884 ] Dir.chroot and '/' — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/25

Hi,

[#8914] Behavior change for Hash#default in 1.8.5? — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

3 messages 2006/09/25

[#8915] Re: Behavior change for Hash#default in 1.8.5? — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...> 2006/09/25

On 9/24/06, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:

[#8916] Re: Behavior change for Hash#default in 1.8.5? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/25

Hi,

[#8920] rdoc capture output (help message) — "greg weber" <eegreg@...>

Hi,

9 messages 2006/09/25

[#8940] Re: [PATCH] rdoc capture output (help message) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/27

[#8941] Re: [PATCH] rdoc capture output (help message) — "greg weber" <eegreg@...> 2006/09/27

The simplest command line would be

[#8943] Re: [PATCH] rdoc capture output (help message) — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/09/28

greg weber wrote:

[#8953] Re: [PATCH] rdoc capture output (help message) — "greg weber" <eegreg@...> 2006/09/29

It looks like you could seperate this out into a rake task, but then

[#8955] Re: [PATCH] rdoc capture output (help message) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/29

On Sep 29, 2006, at 5:52 AM, greg weber wrote:

[#8965] Re: [PATCH] rdoc capture output (help message) — "greg weber" <eegreg@...> 2006/09/29

Thanks for pushing back on this as a good maintainer should. You

[#8966] Re: [PATCH] rdoc capture output (help message) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/30

On Sep 29, 2006, at 4:56 PM, greg weber wrote:

[#8937] Re: [PATCH] rdoc capture output (help message) — "greg weber" <eegreg@...> 2006/09/27

there was a bug in original implementation. attached is a new rdoc.rb diff

[#8922] Problem with latest array.c changes — "Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@...>

This change

3 messages 2006/09/25

[#8924] Re: Problem with latest array.c changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/25

Hi,

[#8934] Re: Problem with latest array.c changes — "Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@...> 2006/09/27

On 9/25/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#8926] make test 1.9 fail — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>

Print nil prints now nothing and not 'nil'. So following test fails

1 message 2006/09/26

[#8928] Re: RDoc patch, possible bug in socket.c for TCPSocket.new — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Daniel Berger wrote:

1 message 2006/09/26

[#8929] Re: RDoc patch, possible bug in socket.c for TCPSocket.new — gwtmp01@...

6 messages 2006/09/26

[#8930] Re: RDoc patch, possible bug in socket.c for TCPSocket.new — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/09/26

gwtmp01@mac.com wrote:

[#8932] Re: RDoc patch, possible bug in socket.c for TCPSocket.new — gwtmp01@... 2006/09/26

[#8933] Re: RDoc patch, possible bug in socket.c for TCPSocket.new — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/09/26

On 9/26/06, gwtmp01@mac.com <gwtmp01@mac.com> wrote:

[#8935] Re: RDoc patch, possible bug in socket.c for TCPSocket.new — "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@...> 2006/09/27

On 9/26/06, Francis Cianfrocca <garbagecat10@gmail.com> wrote:

[#8936] Re: RDoc patch, possible bug in socket.c for TCPSocket.new — gwtmp01@... 2006/09/27

[#8938] "ri Array.new" doesn't show assignment values — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5921, was opened at 2006-09-27 01:52

1 message 2006/09/27

[#8942] Patch for object.c and Class.inherited — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

1 message 2006/09/28

[#8944] "nundefined method `to_str' for nil:NilClass" exception from mkmf.rb when doing "make distclean" — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5940, was opened at 2006-09-28 10:59

2 messages 2006/09/28

[#8947] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5940 ] "nundefined method `to_str' for nil:NilClass" exception from mkmf.rb when doing "make distclean" — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/09/29

Hi,

[#8945] "nundefined method `to_str' for nil:NilClass" exception from mkmf.rb when doing "make distclean" — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5941, was opened at 2006-09-28 10:59

1 message 2006/09/28

[#8946] "nundefined method `to_str' for nil:NilClass" exception from ext/extmk.rb when doing "make distclean" — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5942, was opened at 2006-09-28 11:07

1 message 2006/09/28

[#8948] socket (and many others) not building on osx? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I'm stumped. A brand new clean build doesn't build socket.

5 messages 2006/09/29

[#8949] Re: socket (and many others) not building on osx? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/09/29

Hi,

[#8950] Re: socket (and many others) not building on osx? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/09/29

[#8951] Re: socket (and many others) not building on osx? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/09/29

Hi,

[#8952] Re: socket (and many others) not building on osx? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/09/29

[#8954] The %? .. ? Operator — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

I'm needing to know the full list of characters that can (or cannot)

6 messages 2006/09/29

[#8957] Re: The %? .. ? Operator — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/29

On Sep 29, 2006, at 9:56 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#8959] Re: The %? .. ? Operator — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/09/29

On Sep 29, 2006, at 1:52 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#8961] Re: The %? .. ? Operator — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/29

On Sep 29, 2006, at 12:41 PM, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#8962] Re: The %? .. ? Operator — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/09/29

On Sep 29, 2006, at 4:08 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#9001] Re: The %? .. ? Operator — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/04

On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#8956] 1.8 CVS regressions — ville.mattila@...

Hello,

3 messages 2006/09/29

[#8960] Re: [BUG] 1.8 CVS regressions — "Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@...> 2006/09/29

Can you try to apply this patch?

[#8967] Re: [BUG] 1.8 CVS regressions — ville.mattila@... 2006/09/30

"Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@gmail.com> wrote on 29.09.2006 23:27:33:

[#8958] rb_protect in rb_f_fork? — ctm@... (Clifford T. Matthews)

Howdy,

3 messages 2006/09/29

[#8980] Re: rb_protect in rb_f_fork? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/02

Hi,

[#8983] Re: rb_protect in rb_f_fork? — ctm@... (Clifford T. Matthews) 2006/10/02

[#8963] abort trap on pure ruby (1.8.x--yesterday's cvs) — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I get the following error from the code below. Doesn't repro in gdb

2 messages 2006/09/29

[#8964] Re: abort trap on pure ruby (1.8.x--yesterday's cvs) — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/09/29

[#8968] No configure option for non-standard library locations (e.g., TCL/TK) — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5972, was opened at 2006-09-30 02:18

2 messages 2006/09/30

[#8970] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5972 ] No configure option for non-standard library locations (e.g., TCL/TK) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/01

Hi,

[#8969] Build summary would be helpful — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5973, was opened at 2006-09-30 02:22

1 message 2006/09/30

[ ruby-Bugs-5763 ] Problem with generated soap requests / classes using the WSDL Tools

From: <noreply@...>

Date: 2006-09-14 22:53:20 UTC

List: ruby-core #8874

Bugs item #5763, was opened at 2006-09-14 17:52
You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=5763&group_id=426

Category: Standard Library
Group: 1.8.5
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: David Sledge (dsledge)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Problem with generated soap requests / classes using the WSDL Tools

Initial Comment:
When using the SOAP::WSDLDriverFactory to talk to webservices the form tag of some elements is not honored. If you look at the wsdl in the attached test app you will see that the schemas 'elementFormDefault="qualified"' but the complexType sequence elements have a 'form="unqualified"' tag. The generated soap request is not correct. It adds the namespace for the sequence elements of the complexType anyway. This also happens with the classes generated using the WSDL2Ruby class to generate classdef's. I was able to get around it by generating a driver with WSDL2Ruby and setting the flag on the in parameters to false and then modifying the classdef generated file for the complexType to have nil namespaces in the @@schema_element. Also it seems wrong for the response that I do not have to set the flag on the out parameters of the generated driver class to false or change the @@schema_element in the classdef generated file and it still properly handlers the response xml that does n
 ot have the namespace on its complex type sequence elements.

The test app will give an exception because there is no webservice server running but it still generates the request data logged in the "logs" directory.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=5763&group_id=426

Thread

In This Thread

Prev Next