[#8815] Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Howdy,

12 messages 2006/09/09
[#8817] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/09

On Sep 8, 2006, at 10:10 PM, Sean E. Russell wrote:

Re: okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch

From: why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>
Date: 2006-09-11 15:42:54 UTC
List: ruby-core #8839


On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 02:49:53 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> In message "Re: okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch"
>     on Sat, 9 Sep 2006 02:16:43 +0900, why the lucky stiff
> <ruby-core@whytheluckystiff.net> writes:
> 
> |Also, should I rename struct thread, since it will be exposed?  And use
> |rb_thread_t throughout?
> 
> It's unavoidable when we expose thread_t.

Very good.  I am still away, in a few more days then.

_why


In This Thread