ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#8768] Thread#kill! patch — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

Wow, MenTaLguY has worked up a patch[1] to ruby-1.8.5 and ruby_1_8 branch for

3 messages 2006/09/01

[#8772] Re: Thread#kill! patch — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2006/09/01

On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 09:19 +0900, why the lucky stiff wrote:

[#8809] Re: Thread#kill! patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/08

Hi,

[#8770] socks_init in ruby/ext/socket/socket.c — Sven Klemm <sven@...3d2.de>

Hi,

2 messages 2006/09/01

[#8771] Re: [PATCH] socks_init in ruby/ext/socket/socket.c — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/01

Hi,

[#8774] suprising benchmark — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>

I wondered what gives you optimalization

3 messages 2006/09/02

[#8775] Re: suprising benchmark — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/02

On Sep 2, 2006, at 2:18 AM, Ondrej Bilka wrote:

[#8781] Re: suprising benchmark — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2006/09/03

On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 07:21:30PM +0200, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#8787] Literal inconsistency — Calamitas <calamitates@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2006/09/04

[#8788] Re: Literal inconsistency — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/04

Hi,

[#8789] Re: Literal inconsistency — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2006/09/04

Calamitas <calamitates@gmail.com> writes:

[#8790] Re: Literal inconsistency — Calamitas <calamitates@...> 2006/09/04

On 9/4/06, Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> wrote:

[#8791] Re: Literal inconsistency — URABE Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2006/09/04

Hi,

[#8792] Re: Literal inconsistency — Calamitas <calamitates@...> 2006/09/04

On 9/4/06, URABE Shyouhei <shyouhei@ice.uec.ac.jp> wrote:

[#8800] Re: Literal inconsistency — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/09/05

On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Calamitas wrote:

[#8793] Re: Literal inconsistency — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/09/04

On 9/4/06, Calamitas <calamitates@gmail.com> wrote:

[#8794] bignums — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>

I want ask how look integration of faster bignums.

7 messages 2006/09/04

[#8801] Re: bignums — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/09/05

On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Ondrej Bilka wrote:

[#8819] Re: bignums — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2006/09/09

On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 12:12:12AM +0200, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#8822] Re: bignums — nobu@... 2006/09/10

Hi,

[#8825] Re: bignums — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2006/09/10

On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 05:05:22AM +0200, nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:

[#8882] Re: bignums — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/09/15

On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Ondrej Bilka wrote:

[#8795] Re: bignums — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/04

Hello,

[#8796] gem_server fails with getnameinfo: ai_family not supported — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5627, was opened at 2006-09-05 00:48

2 messages 2006/09/05

[#8797] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5627 ] gem_server fails with getnameinfo: ai_family not supported — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/05

On Sep 4, 2006, at 10:48 PM, <noreply@rubyforge.org>

[#8798] okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

We have previously talked about getting the sandbox to obey thread switching on

9 messages 2006/09/05

[#8808] Re: okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/08

Hi,

[#8811] Re: okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/09/08

On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 02:22:48PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8812] Re: okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/08

Hi,

[#8839] Re: okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/09/11

[#8917] Re: okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/09/25

Hi,

[#8923] Re: okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/09/25

On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 01:56:58PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#8925] Re: okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/09/26

Hi,

[#8939] Re: okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2006/09/27

Hello,

[#8802] WEBrick::Cookie support for multiple cookies per set-cookie — Aaron Patterson <aaron_patterson@...>

WEBrick's cookie class has a method for parsing Set-Cookie headers, but

3 messages 2006/09/06

[#8805] Re: [PATCH] WEBrick::Cookie support for multiple cookies per set-cookie — GOTOU Yuuzou <gotoyuzo@...> 2006/09/08

In message <20060906023817.GA13370@eviladmins.lan>,

[#8824] Re: [PATCH] WEBrick::Cookie support for multiple cookies per set-cookie — Aaron Patterson <aaron_patterson@...> 2006/09/10

On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:10:51AM +0900, GOTOU Yuuzou wrote:

[#8803] Fix: no black boxes in rdoc diagrams anymore — "Florian Frank" <flori@...>

Hi,

1 message 2006/09/06

[#8804] Emacs ruby-mode: here-doc indentation & more — "Marshall T. Vandegrift" <llasram@...>

2 messages 2006/09/06

[#8854] Re: [PATCH] Emacs ruby-mode: here-doc indentation & more — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/13

Hi,

[#8806] loginfo during check-in — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Heya,

2 messages 2006/09/08

[#8807] Re: loginfo during check-in — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/08

Hi,

[#8810] Server maintenance — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>

Hi,

1 message 2006/09/08

[#8813] ruby-1.8.5 loads fox16.so more than once — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5701, was opened at 2006-09-08 20:59

4 messages 2006/09/09

[#8814] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5701 ] ruby-1.8.5 loads fox16.so more than once — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/09

On Sep 8, 2006, at 7:00 PM, <noreply@rubyforge.org> wrote:

[#8820] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5701 ] ruby-1.8.5 loads fox16.so more than once — "Lyle Johnson" <lyle.johnson@...> 2006/09/09

On 9/8/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:

[#8823] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5701 ] ruby-1.8.5 loads fox16.so more than once — nobu@... 2006/09/10

Hi,

[#8815] Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Howdy,

12 messages 2006/09/09

[#8817] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/09

On Sep 8, 2006, at 10:10 PM, Sean E. Russell wrote:

[#8821] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2006/09/10

On Saturday 09 September 2006 01:42, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#8830] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/10

On Sep 9, 2006, at 7:16 PM, Sean E. Russell wrote:

[#8837] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2006/09/11

On Sunday 10 September 2006 22:57, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#8880] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Vincent Fourmond <vincent.fourmond@9online.fr> 2006/09/15

> One is NEVER allowed to assume that a pointer can be stored in an arithmetic

[#8881] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2006/09/15

On Friday 15 September 2006 16:46, Vincent Fourmond wrote:

[#8883] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2006/09/15

Marc Haisenko wrote:

[#8841] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/09/11

On Monday 11 September 2006 03:58, Marc Haisenko wrote:

[#8848] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/11

On Sep 11, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Sean Russell wrote:

[#8840] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/09/11

On Sunday 10 September 2006 16:57, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#8818] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/09

[#8826] OptionParser < Hash — "greg weber" <eegreg@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2006/09/10

[#8827] Re: [PATCH] OptionParser < Hash — "greg weber" <eegreg@...> 2006/09/10

Think I forgot to attach the patch.

[#8831] Re: [PATCH] OptionParser < Hash — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/09/11

Hi,

[#8834] Re: [PATCH] OptionParser < Hash — "greg weber" <eegreg@...> 2006/09/11

> OptionParser's methods are partioned to 2 kinds. Methods to register

[#8846] Re: [PATCH] OptionParser < Hash — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/11

On Sep 10, 2006, at 11:03 PM, greg weber wrote:

[#8835] Re: [PATCH] OptionParser < Hash — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/09/11

Hi,

[#8856] Re: [PATCH] OptionParser < Hash — "greg weber" <eegreg@...> 2006/09/13

This is great, Nobu!

[#8858] Re: [PATCH] OptionParser < Hash — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/09/13

Hi,

[#8828] REXML fails to parse UTF-16 XML. — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5711, was opened at 2006-09-11 01:25

6 messages 2006/09/10

[#8833] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5711 ] REXML fails to parse UTF-16 XML. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/11

Hi,

[#8842] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5711 ] REXML fails to parse UTF-16 XML. — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/09/11

On Sunday 10 September 2006 22:45, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8843] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5711 ] REXML fails to parse UTF-16 XML. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/11

Hi,

[#8844] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5711 ] REXML fails to parse UTF-16 XML. — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/09/11

On Monday 11 September 2006 12:59, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8845] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5711 ] REXML fails to parse UTF-16 XML. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/11

Hi,

[#8829] require 'rdoc/usage' fails on ppc — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5712, was opened at 2006-09-10 18:06

3 messages 2006/09/10

[#8832] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5712 ] require 'rdoc/usage' fails on ppc — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/11

Hi,

[#8853] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5712 ] require 'rdoc/usage' fails on ppc — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2006/09/13

On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 10:46 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8836] YAML errors with indentation indicator — "Akira FUNAI" <funai.akira@...>

Hi,

1 message 2006/09/11

[#8838] rdoc with optparse — "greg weber" <eegreg@...>

This is a patch to allow rdoc to read the help message from optparse,

3 messages 2006/09/11

[#8847] Re: [PATCH] rdoc with optparse — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/11

On Sep 11, 2006, at 4:19 AM, greg weber wrote:

[#8849] Re: [PATCH] rdoc with optparse — "greg weber" <eegreg@...> 2006/09/11

sorry, diff is attached.

[#8850] constants (rcrs 178, 343,345) — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>

I looked at my rcr 343 and 345. Could you give me some feedback?

1 message 2006/09/12

[#8851] README.EXT -- English adjustments. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

I've been looking at README.EXT and thought I could make the English

1 message 2006/09/12

[#8852] Re: README.EXT -- English adjustments. — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2006/09/12

[#8855] Re: README.EXT -- English adjustments. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/09/13

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#8857] RDOC doesn't show string "#" or "\#" — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5740, was opened at 2006-09-13 11:55

1 message 2006/09/13

[#8859] (test/unit) assert_raise without parameters should check if any exception is being raised — <noreply@...>

Patches item #5748, was opened at 2006-09-13 19:34

1 message 2006/09/13

[#8860] Date._parse doesn't understand hour only time, e.g. 2pm — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5752, was opened at 2006-09-14 10:40

1 message 2006/09/13

[#8861] new changes in strings+symbols — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, matz wrote:

5 messages 2006/09/14

[#8863] Re: new changes in strings+symbols — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/14

Hi,

[#8872] Re: new changes in strings+symbols — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2006/09/14

On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 16:34 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8879] Re: new changes in strings+symbols — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/15

Hi,

[#8886] Re: new changes in strings+symbols — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2006/09/17

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#8862] ruby-1.8 CVS make check fails — ville.mattila@...

1 message 2006/09/14

[#8864] documentation of ruby internals — Deni George <denigeorge@...>

Hello

11 messages 2006/09/14

[#8865] Re: documentation of ruby internals — "A. S. Bradbury" <asbradbury@...> 2006/09/14

On Thursday 14 September 2006 11:30, Deni George wrote:

[#8870] Re: documentation of ruby internals — Mike Dvorkin <mike@...> 2006/09/14

You can use Google translation to read the original. It produces

[#8871] Re: documentation of ruby internals — Deni George <denigeorge@...> 2006/09/14

thank you

[#8867] Re: documentation of ruby internals — Deni George <denigeorge@...> 2006/09/14

Thanx Alex .

[#8873] Re: documentation of ruby internals — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/14

On Sep 14, 2006, at 4:38 AM, Deni George wrote:

[#8866] Re: documentation of ruby internals — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/09/14

On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Deni George wrote:

[#8868] Re: documentation of ruby internals — Deni George <denigeorge@...> 2006/09/14

Hugh Sasse wrote:

[#8869] Re: documentation of ruby internals — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/09/14

On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Deni George wrote:

[#8877] Re: documentation of ruby internals — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/09/15

On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Deni George wrote:

[#8878] Re: documentation of ruby internals — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/09/15

On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 05:05:58PM +0900, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#8874] Problem with generated soap requests / classes using the WSDL Tools — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5763, was opened at 2006-09-14 17:52

1 message 2006/09/14

[#8875] Ruby Hackers Guide Translations — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

I have a full machine translation of Ruby Hackers Guide

2 messages 2006/09/15

[#8876] Re: Ruby Hackers Guide Translations — dreamhead <dreamhead.cn@...> 2006/09/15

Maybe this message should be sent to rhg (the project that translates

[#8884] Curses problem — "Overdorf, Sam" <sam.overdorf@...>

I have been trying to use the "Curses" library and am having the

1 message 2006/09/16

[#8885] numeric.c fails to build on 64-bit platforms (Fedora Core 5 x86_64 gcc 4.1.1) — <noreply@...>

Patches item #5774, was opened at 2006-09-16 12:19

4 messages 2006/09/16

[#8887] Re: [ ruby-Patches-5774 ] numeric.c fails to build on 64-bit platforms (Fedora Core 5 x86_64 gcc 4.1.1) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/18

Hi,

[#8893] Re: [ ruby-Patches-5774 ] numeric.c fails to build on 64-bit platforms (Fedora Core 5 x86_64 gcc 4.1.1) — Tadashi Saito <shiba@...2.accsnet.ne.jp> 2006/09/18

Hi all,

[#8895] Re: [ ruby-Patches-5774 ] numeric.c fails to build on 64-bit platforms (Fedora Core 5 x86_64 gcc 4.1.1) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/09/18

Hi,

[#8888] 1.9 build failure. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

Testing a patch (nowhere near digest) against the latest 1.9 on Sun

4 messages 2006/09/18

[#8889] Re: 1.9 build failure. — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/09/18

Hi,

[#8890] Re: 1.9 build failure. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/09/18

On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#8891] Re: 1.9 build failure. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/18

Hi,

[#8892] Getting docs out of README.EXT — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

I've been trying to find the easiest way to get README.EXT into

2 messages 2006/09/18

[#8894] Re: Getting docs out of README.EXT — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/18

On Sep 18, 2006, at 7:54 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:

[#8896] FXRI/IRB - Shift + Backspace crashes help viewer — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5821, was opened at 2006-09-20 11:59

1 message 2006/09/20

[#8897] Ruby's 'etc' module cannot handle the UID of OS X 'nobody' properly — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5822, was opened at 2006-09-20 11:13

5 messages 2006/09/20

[#8900] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5822 ] Ruby's 'etc' module cannot handle the UID of OS X 'nobody' properly — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/21

Hi,

[#8901] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5822 ] Ruby's 'etc' module cannot handle the UID of OS X 'nobody' properly — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...> 2006/09/21

On 9/20/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#8902] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5822 ] Ruby's 'etc' module cannot handle the UID of OS X 'nobody' properly — Jim Freeze <jimfreeze@...> 2006/09/21

On Sep 20, 2006, at 8:30 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8903] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5822 ] Ruby's 'etc' module cannot handle the UID of OS X 'nobody' properly — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/21

Hi,

[#8898] Typo in example comment for recent string.c v 1.274 commit — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2006/09/21

[#8899] Re: Typo in example comment for recent string.c v 1.274 commit — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/21

Hi,

[#8904] patch bignums — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>

I am so far with implementing faster bignums:

7 messages 2006/09/21

[#8905] Re: patch bignums — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/09/21

Hi,

[#8910] Re: patch bignums — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2006/09/22

On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 06:30:49PM +0200, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#8906] Re: patch bignums — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/09/21

> -----Original Message-----

[#8909] Re: patch bignums — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/22

Hi,

[#8907] Re: patch bignums — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/09/21

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 01:30:49AM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#8908] Re: patch bignums — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/09/22

Hi,

[#8911] Typo in documentation of Kernel#rand — <noreply@...>

Patches item #5869, was opened at 2006-09-23 14:25

1 message 2006/09/23

[#8912] NODE_POSTEXE / gc — ts <decoux@...>

3 messages 2006/09/24

[#8918] Re: NODE_POSTEXE / gc — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/25

Hi,

[#8931] Re: NODE_POSTEXE / gc — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/09/26

On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, ts wrote:

[#8913] Dir.chroot and '/' — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5884, was opened at 2006-09-24 18:54

3 messages 2006/09/25

[#8919] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5884 ] Dir.chroot and '/' — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/09/25

Hi,

[#8921] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5884 ] Dir.chroot and '/' — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/25

Hi,

[#8914] Behavior change for Hash#default in 1.8.5? — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

3 messages 2006/09/25

[#8915] Re: Behavior change for Hash#default in 1.8.5? — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...> 2006/09/25

On 9/24/06, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:

[#8916] Re: Behavior change for Hash#default in 1.8.5? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/25

Hi,

[#8920] rdoc capture output (help message) — "greg weber" <eegreg@...>

Hi,

9 messages 2006/09/25

[#8940] Re: [PATCH] rdoc capture output (help message) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/27

[#8941] Re: [PATCH] rdoc capture output (help message) — "greg weber" <eegreg@...> 2006/09/27

The simplest command line would be

[#8943] Re: [PATCH] rdoc capture output (help message) — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/09/28

greg weber wrote:

[#8953] Re: [PATCH] rdoc capture output (help message) — "greg weber" <eegreg@...> 2006/09/29

It looks like you could seperate this out into a rake task, but then

[#8955] Re: [PATCH] rdoc capture output (help message) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/29

On Sep 29, 2006, at 5:52 AM, greg weber wrote:

[#8965] Re: [PATCH] rdoc capture output (help message) — "greg weber" <eegreg@...> 2006/09/29

Thanks for pushing back on this as a good maintainer should. You

[#8966] Re: [PATCH] rdoc capture output (help message) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/30

On Sep 29, 2006, at 4:56 PM, greg weber wrote:

[#8937] Re: [PATCH] rdoc capture output (help message) — "greg weber" <eegreg@...> 2006/09/27

there was a bug in original implementation. attached is a new rdoc.rb diff

[#8922] Problem with latest array.c changes — "Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@...>

This change

3 messages 2006/09/25

[#8924] Re: Problem with latest array.c changes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/09/25

Hi,

[#8934] Re: Problem with latest array.c changes — "Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@...> 2006/09/27

On 9/25/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#8926] make test 1.9 fail — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>

Print nil prints now nothing and not 'nil'. So following test fails

1 message 2006/09/26

[#8928] Re: RDoc patch, possible bug in socket.c for TCPSocket.new — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Daniel Berger wrote:

1 message 2006/09/26

[#8929] Re: RDoc patch, possible bug in socket.c for TCPSocket.new — gwtmp01@...

6 messages 2006/09/26

[#8930] Re: RDoc patch, possible bug in socket.c for TCPSocket.new — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/09/26

gwtmp01@mac.com wrote:

[#8932] Re: RDoc patch, possible bug in socket.c for TCPSocket.new — gwtmp01@... 2006/09/26

[#8933] Re: RDoc patch, possible bug in socket.c for TCPSocket.new — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/09/26

On 9/26/06, gwtmp01@mac.com <gwtmp01@mac.com> wrote:

[#8935] Re: RDoc patch, possible bug in socket.c for TCPSocket.new — "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@...> 2006/09/27

On 9/26/06, Francis Cianfrocca <garbagecat10@gmail.com> wrote:

[#8936] Re: RDoc patch, possible bug in socket.c for TCPSocket.new — gwtmp01@... 2006/09/27

[#8938] "ri Array.new" doesn't show assignment values — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5921, was opened at 2006-09-27 01:52

1 message 2006/09/27

[#8942] Patch for object.c and Class.inherited — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

1 message 2006/09/28

[#8944] "nundefined method `to_str' for nil:NilClass" exception from mkmf.rb when doing "make distclean" — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5940, was opened at 2006-09-28 10:59

2 messages 2006/09/28

[#8947] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5940 ] "nundefined method `to_str' for nil:NilClass" exception from mkmf.rb when doing "make distclean" — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/09/29

Hi,

[#8945] "nundefined method `to_str' for nil:NilClass" exception from mkmf.rb when doing "make distclean" — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5941, was opened at 2006-09-28 10:59

1 message 2006/09/28

[#8946] "nundefined method `to_str' for nil:NilClass" exception from ext/extmk.rb when doing "make distclean" — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5942, was opened at 2006-09-28 11:07

1 message 2006/09/28

[#8948] socket (and many others) not building on osx? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I'm stumped. A brand new clean build doesn't build socket.

5 messages 2006/09/29

[#8949] Re: socket (and many others) not building on osx? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/09/29

Hi,

[#8950] Re: socket (and many others) not building on osx? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/09/29

[#8951] Re: socket (and many others) not building on osx? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/09/29

Hi,

[#8952] Re: socket (and many others) not building on osx? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/09/29

[#8954] The %? .. ? Operator — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

I'm needing to know the full list of characters that can (or cannot)

6 messages 2006/09/29

[#8957] Re: The %? .. ? Operator — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/29

On Sep 29, 2006, at 9:56 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#8959] Re: The %? .. ? Operator — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/09/29

On Sep 29, 2006, at 1:52 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#8961] Re: The %? .. ? Operator — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/29

On Sep 29, 2006, at 12:41 PM, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#8962] Re: The %? .. ? Operator — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/09/29

On Sep 29, 2006, at 4:08 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#9001] Re: The %? .. ? Operator — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/04

On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#8956] 1.8 CVS regressions — ville.mattila@...

Hello,

3 messages 2006/09/29

[#8960] Re: [BUG] 1.8 CVS regressions — "Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@...> 2006/09/29

Can you try to apply this patch?

[#8967] Re: [BUG] 1.8 CVS regressions — ville.mattila@... 2006/09/30

"Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@gmail.com> wrote on 29.09.2006 23:27:33:

[#8958] rb_protect in rb_f_fork? — ctm@... (Clifford T. Matthews)

Howdy,

3 messages 2006/09/29

[#8980] Re: rb_protect in rb_f_fork? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/02

Hi,

[#8983] Re: rb_protect in rb_f_fork? — ctm@... (Clifford T. Matthews) 2006/10/02

[#8963] abort trap on pure ruby (1.8.x--yesterday's cvs) — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I get the following error from the code below. Doesn't repro in gdb

2 messages 2006/09/29

[#8964] Re: abort trap on pure ruby (1.8.x--yesterday's cvs) — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/09/29

[#8968] No configure option for non-standard library locations (e.g., TCL/TK) — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5972, was opened at 2006-09-30 02:18

2 messages 2006/09/30

[#8970] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5972 ] No configure option for non-standard library locations (e.g., TCL/TK) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/01

Hi,

[#8969] Build summary would be helpful — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5973, was opened at 2006-09-30 02:22

1 message 2006/09/30

Re: Getting docs out of README.EXT

From: Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

Date: 2006-09-18 19:02:16 UTC

List: ruby-core #8894

On Sep 18, 2006, at 7:54 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:

> I've been trying to find the easiest way to get README.EXT into
> html, and finally found that the best way was to use RDoc.  This
> patch is against 1.9.  It seems to work OK, but there's a couple of
> issues.
>
> REAME.EXT is picked up, but nothing from it appears in the ri docs,
> and to be honest, I don't know how I should locate it if it did.

It would need to be attached to a class or module somewhere.   
The :include: directive handles this.  Look at RDoc's ri for an  
example.  I don't know where to attach it, though.

> A `grep -ri README .` in the ri directory turns up nothing.  This also
> shows that at present we have no make target for HTML docs, which is
> probably where this sort of thing should naturally live.  I was
> hoping that with a bit of extra markup we could make this README.EXT
> very browser friendly, with a table of contents, for example.  At
> the moment I've not added in anything along those lines, and it
> would seem pointless till we have an HTML target.  I'm not sure what
> to do about adding an HTML target, because that necessitates having
> a sensible place for the HTML, and declaring it up front, and there
> will be no useful sensible place for it that is applicable to all
> users of ruby.

ri is stored in /usr/local/share/ri/<ver>
rdoc could be stored in /usr/local/share/rdoc/<ver>

> Does anyone have any suggestions as a good way to make this [more]
> useful?

-- 
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant

http://trackmap.robotcoop.com

Thread

In This Thread

Prev Next