[#8787] Literal inconsistency — Calamitas <calamitates@...>
Hi,
Calamitas <calamitates@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/4/06, Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> wrote:
[#8794] bignums — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>
I want ask how look integration of faster bignums.
[#8798] okay, threading & sandbox r70 -- the latest patch — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>
We have previously talked about getting the sandbox to obey thread switching on
Hi,
[#8802] WEBrick::Cookie support for multiple cookies per set-cookie — Aaron Patterson <aaron_patterson@...>
WEBrick's cookie class has a method for parsing Set-Cookie headers, but
[#8813] ruby-1.8.5 loads fox16.so more than once — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #5701, was opened at 2006-09-08 20:59
[#8815] Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>
Howdy,
On Sep 8, 2006, at 10:10 PM, Sean E. Russell wrote:
On Saturday 09 September 2006 01:42, Eric Hodel wrote:
On Sep 9, 2006, at 7:16 PM, Sean E. Russell wrote:
On Sunday 10 September 2006 22:57, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#8826] OptionParser < Hash — "greg weber" <eegreg@...>
Hi,
[#8828] REXML fails to parse UTF-16 XML. — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #5711, was opened at 2006-09-11 01:25
Hi,
[#8861] new changes in strings+symbols — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, matz wrote:
[#8864] documentation of ruby internals — Deni George <denigeorge@...>
Hello
On Thursday 14 September 2006 11:30, Deni George wrote:
[#8885] numeric.c fails to build on 64-bit platforms (Fedora Core 5 x86_64 gcc 4.1.1) — <noreply@...>
Patches item #5774, was opened at 2006-09-16 12:19
Hi,
[#8897] Ruby's 'etc' module cannot handle the UID of OS X 'nobody' properly — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #5822, was opened at 2006-09-20 11:13
Hi,
[#8904] patch bignums — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>
I am so far with implementing faster bignums:
[#8920] rdoc capture output (help message) — "greg weber" <eegreg@...>
Hi,
The simplest command line would be
greg weber wrote:
It looks like you could seperate this out into a rake task, but then
On Sep 29, 2006, at 5:52 AM, greg weber wrote:
[#8929] Re: RDoc patch, possible bug in socket.c for TCPSocket.new — gwtmp01@...
[#8948] socket (and many others) not building on osx? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I'm stumped. A brand new clean build doesn't build socket.
[#8954] The %? .. ? Operator — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
I'm needing to know the full list of characters that can (or cannot)
On Sep 29, 2006, at 9:56 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2
On Monday 11 September 2006 03:58, Marc Haisenko wrote: > On Sunday 10 September 2006 22:57, Eric Hodel wrote: > > On Sep 9, 2006, at 7:16 PM, Sean E. Russell wrote: > > > Hmm. My C is rusty, but I didn't think there was any difference > > > between a > > > pointer and an integer on 32-bit x86. > > > > I don't have one of those (PPC G4). It is very likely that you'll > > run into a platform where this will matter, so your code should be > > correct. > > Yes, for example AMD64: sizeof(int) == 4, sizeof(void*) == 8 > > One is NEVER allowed to assume that a pointer can be stored in an > arithmetic value, e.g. it's possible that on some architecture > arithmetic values are 32 bit and pointers are 36 bit (IIRC there is > an architecture where this is really true). Wow. It is as if I never said "on 32-bit x86". Eerie. --- SER