[#8815] Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Howdy,

12 messages 2006/09/09
[#8817] Re: Segfault in libc strlen, via rb_str_new2 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/09/09

On Sep 8, 2006, at 10:10 PM, Sean E. Russell wrote:

Re: new changes in strings+symbols

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2006-09-15 14:38:15 UTC
List: ruby-core #8879
Hi,

In message "Re: new changes in strings+symbols"
    on Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:12:35 +0900, MenTaLguY <mental@rydia.net> writes:

|Another problem when implementing languages atop Ruby are the
|"synonymous" symbols for unary operators -- e.g. :!, :"!@",
|and :"!(unary)".  Could these be differentiated somehow?

OK, let me consider.  Perhaps moving unification process after intern
should work.

							matz.

In This Thread