[#84867] [Ruby trunk Bug#14357] thread_safe tests suite segfaults — v.ondruch@...
Issue #14357 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch).
11 messages
2018/01/15
[#85364] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14357] thread_safe tests suite segfaults
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/02/03
v.ondruch@tiscali.cz wrote:
[#85368] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14357] thread_safe tests suite segfaults
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/02/03
Eric Wong wrote:
[#85442] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14357] thread_safe tests suite segfaults
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/02/06
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#85451] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14357] thread_safe tests suite segfaults
— Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@...>
2018/02/06
On 02/06/2018 05:00 AM, Eric Wong wrote:
[#84874] [Ruby trunk Bug#14360] Regression CSV#open method for writing from Ruby 2.4.3 to 2.5.0 — shevegen@...
Issue #14360 has been updated by shevegen (Robert A. Heiler).
3 messages
2018/01/15
[#84980] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618][Assigned] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — hsbt@...
Issue #13618 has been updated by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA).
10 messages
2018/01/23
[#85012] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618][Assigned] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/01/23
hsbt@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[#85081] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618][Assigned] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/01/24
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#85082] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618][Assigned] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/01/24
> Thinking about this even more; I don't think it's possible to
[#85088] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — danieldasilvaferreira@...
Issue #13618 has been updated by dsferreira (Daniel Ferreira).
3 messages
2018/01/25
[#85107] [Ruby trunk Misc#14222] Mutex.lock is not safe inside signal handler: what is? — eregontp@...
Issue #14222 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
3 messages
2018/01/25
[#85136] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
samuel@oriontransfer.org wrote:
3 messages
2018/01/26
[ruby-core:85298] [Ruby trunk Feature#14426] [PATCH] openssl: reduce memory allocation in OpenSSL::Buffering#do_write
From:
janko.marohnic@...
Date:
2018-01-31 12:36:42 UTC
List:
ruby-core #85298
Issue #14426 has been reported by janko (Janko Marohnić).
----------------------------------------
Feature #14426: [PATCH] openssl: reduce memory allocation in OpenSSL::Buffering#do_write
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14426
* Author: janko (Janko Marohnić)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
When writing data to an SSLSocket, there are a lot of, in my opinion, unnecessary strings being allocated, concretely in OpenSSL::Buffering#do_write.
When the buffer would be written, it would always be copied into a new string first, regardless of whether the write was partial or not. And in case of partial writes, it's not necessary to create copies of remaining data, we could just use the `String[from, length] = ""` trick immediately which modifies the string in-place.
I also thought that splitting writes on newlines was adding unnecessary memory allocations, so I removed that.
I tested uploading a 5MB file using HTTP.rb, and memory allocation went from 7.7 MB to 0.2 MB with this change.
~~~ ruby
require "http"
require "memory_profiler"
require "stringio"
body = StringIO.new("a" * 5*1024*1024)
MemoryProfiler.report do
HTTP.post("https://example.com", body: body)
end.pretty_print
~~~
---Files--------------------------------
openssl-memory-allocation.patch (913 Bytes)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>