[#84867] [Ruby trunk Bug#14357] thread_safe tests suite segfaults — v.ondruch@...
Issue #14357 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch).
11 messages
2018/01/15
[#85364] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14357] thread_safe tests suite segfaults
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/02/03
v.ondruch@tiscali.cz wrote:
[#85368] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14357] thread_safe tests suite segfaults
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/02/03
Eric Wong wrote:
[#85442] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14357] thread_safe tests suite segfaults
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/02/06
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#85451] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14357] thread_safe tests suite segfaults
— Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@...>
2018/02/06
On 02/06/2018 05:00 AM, Eric Wong wrote:
[#85455] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14357] thread_safe tests suite segfaults
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/02/06
Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com> wrote:
[#84874] [Ruby trunk Bug#14360] Regression CSV#open method for writing from Ruby 2.4.3 to 2.5.0 — shevegen@...
Issue #14360 has been updated by shevegen (Robert A. Heiler).
3 messages
2018/01/15
[#84980] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618][Assigned] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — hsbt@...
Issue #13618 has been updated by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA).
10 messages
2018/01/23
[#85012] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618][Assigned] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/01/23
hsbt@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[#85081] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618][Assigned] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/01/24
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#85082] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618][Assigned] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/01/24
> Thinking about this even more; I don't think it's possible to
[#85088] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — danieldasilvaferreira@...
Issue #13618 has been updated by dsferreira (Daniel Ferreira).
3 messages
2018/01/25
[#85107] [Ruby trunk Misc#14222] Mutex.lock is not safe inside signal handler: what is? — eregontp@...
Issue #14222 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
3 messages
2018/01/25
[#85136] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
samuel@oriontransfer.org wrote:
3 messages
2018/01/26
[ruby-core:85284] [Ruby trunk Feature#10274][Closed] [PATCH 0/2] more rb_iseq_t reductions (and more planned)
From:
normalperson@...
Date:
2018-01-31 08:29:59 UTC
List:
ruby-core #85284
Issue #10274 has been updated by normalperson (Eric Wong).
Status changed from Open to Closed
Assignee changed from ko1 (Koichi Sasada) to normalperson (Eric Wong)
----------------------------------------
Feature #10274: [PATCH 0/2] more rb_iseq_t reductions (and more planned)
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10274#change-70063
* Author: normalperson (Eric Wong)
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: normalperson (Eric Wong)
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
Both of these are pretty simple, low impact patches:
We are close to being able to fit rb_iseq_t in four 64 byte
cache line (we are 262 bytes after these patches,
a milestone is <= 256 bytes).
* [PATCH 1/2] iseq: reduce from 280 to 272 bytes
- arg_simple is limited to 3 possible values: 0, 1, and 2
- arg_keyword_check is a boolean
- flip_cnt should be int to enforce portable code between 64-bit and
32-bit systems and must fit in FIXNUM space.
I doubt anybody would notice if flip_cnt (or any arg counters)
were 8 bits, even.
* [PATCH 2/2] iseq: remove iseq->iseq field (270 => 262 bytes on 64-bit)
We may store the original iseq after the encoded iseq to reduce
allocation overhead and use a boolean to denote whether or not
the iseq_encoded field contains data at the end.
This simplifies iseq_free and iseq_memsize a little, too.
I will commit in a week or so unless there are objections.
Future:
Move some keyword-related fields into its own struct (similar to
catch table). Maybe compile_data can be split off.
---Files--------------------------------
0001-iseq-reduce-from-280-to-272-bytes.patch (2.35 KB)
0002-iseq-remove-iseq-iseq-field-270-262-bytes-on-64-bit.patch (3.32 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>