[#84867] [Ruby trunk Bug#14357] thread_safe tests suite segfaults — v.ondruch@...
Issue #14357 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch).
11 messages
2018/01/15
[#85364] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14357] thread_safe tests suite segfaults
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/02/03
v.ondruch@tiscali.cz wrote:
[#85368] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14357] thread_safe tests suite segfaults
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/02/03
Eric Wong wrote:
[#85442] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14357] thread_safe tests suite segfaults
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/02/06
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#85451] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14357] thread_safe tests suite segfaults
— Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@...>
2018/02/06
On 02/06/2018 05:00 AM, Eric Wong wrote:
[#85455] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14357] thread_safe tests suite segfaults
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/02/06
Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com> wrote:
[#84874] [Ruby trunk Bug#14360] Regression CSV#open method for writing from Ruby 2.4.3 to 2.5.0 — shevegen@...
Issue #14360 has been updated by shevegen (Robert A. Heiler).
3 messages
2018/01/15
[#84980] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618][Assigned] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — hsbt@...
Issue #13618 has been updated by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA).
10 messages
2018/01/23
[#85012] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618][Assigned] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/01/23
hsbt@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[#85081] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618][Assigned] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/01/24
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#85082] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618][Assigned] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/01/24
> Thinking about this even more; I don't think it's possible to
[#85088] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — danieldasilvaferreira@...
Issue #13618 has been updated by dsferreira (Daniel Ferreira).
3 messages
2018/01/25
[#85107] [Ruby trunk Misc#14222] Mutex.lock is not safe inside signal handler: what is? — eregontp@...
Issue #14222 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
3 messages
2018/01/25
[#85136] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
samuel@oriontransfer.org wrote:
3 messages
2018/01/26
[ruby-core:84624] [Ruby trunk Bug#14252] Refined Method Visibility Lost with Dynamic Dispatch and Reflection
From:
michaud.sonny@...
Date:
2018-01-04 03:25:12 UTC
List:
ruby-core #84624
Issue #14252 has been updated by sonnym (Sonny Michaud).
I wrote an article explaining what I was trying to accomplish when I encountered this behavior, in case that helps elucidate my motivations: https://sonnym.github.io/2018/01/03/privacy-and-exposure-gatekeeprs-and-privileged-consumers/
----------------------------------------
Bug #14252: Refined Method Visibility Lost with Dynamic Dispatch and Reflection
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14252#change-69168
* Author: sonnym (Sonny Michaud)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.5.0p0 (2017-12-25 revision 61468) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN, 2.5: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Consider the following simple objects, one with a protected class method and another with a public class method calling on the protected method. This is accomplished using a refinement that marks the method as public on the singleton class of the original object.
~~~ ruby
class Protected
class << self
protected
def print
:protected
end
end
end
module Publicize
refine Protected.singleton_class do
public :print
end
end
class Public
using Publicize
def self.print
Protected.public_methods.include?(:print) # false
Protected.protected_methods.include?(:print) # true
Protected.print # works
Protected.public_send(:print) # fails
end
end
Public.print
~~~
This works perfectly well for the static `Protected.print` call, but has a number of surprises when trying to do anything more advanced. Namely:
* Attempting to call the method with refined visibility raises a `NoMethodError`
* The method appears in the `protected_methods` list of the original object
* The method does not appear in the `public_methods` list of the original object
As a user, I would expect all those things to be not the case, since, if I opened the class directly and changed the visibility of the method, those three items would no longer be true.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>