From: danieldasilvaferreira@... Date: 2018-01-25T08:11:08+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:85104] [Ruby trunk Feature#14392] Pipe operator Issue #14392 has been updated by dsferreira (Daniel Ferreira). shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) wrote: > Don't you have difficulties writing elixir code then? I mentioned already that Elixir it is there only as a reference. I do not code Elixir. > I think that a visibility of a method shall be placed somewhere near the method name. The reason I think otherwise is this: When I look into a specific method my first concern is about the source code not its visibility. Visibility information it is important but secondary when doing code analysis. Why? Because I'm totally confident that there are no issues associated to the visibility that is in place. It is something that is their set to be forgotten. ---------------------------------------- Feature #14392: Pipe operator https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14392#change-69816 * Author: dsferreira (Daniel Ferreira) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: ---------------------------------------- I would like to see implemented in ruby a pipe operator as we have in elixir. An example of application I have in mind is this: ```ruby class Foo def bar(var) puts ���Hello #{var}!��� end |> private def baz(arg) bar(arg) end end foo = Foo.new foo.baz("Fred") # => "Hello Fred!" ``` It can also help simplify method chains: ```ruby class Secret def initialise(user, password) @user = user @password = password end def second_pass(encrypted_string) encrypted_string.chain_4.chain_5.chain_6 end |> private ## # Super encryption def super_encryption @password.chain_1.chain_2.chain_3 |> second_pass end |> public end ``` And also simplify codes like this: ```ruby class Foo def bar(*args) baz = args.select { |arg| arg =~ /regex/ }.first good?(baz) end public :bar def good(arg) arg.to_s.size > 10 end private :good end ``` to become: ```ruby class Foo ## # Bar public method. def bar(*args) args.select { |arg| arg =~ /regex/ }.first |> good? end |> public def good(arg) arg.to_s.size > 10 end |> private end ``` Lots of local variables would be saved and I would expect some performance improvements with that. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: