[#80974] [Ruby trunk Feature#13517] [PATCH] reduce rb_mutex_t size from 160 to 80 bytes on 64-bit — ko1@...
Issue #13517 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
4 messages
2017/05/02
[#81024] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13517] [PATCH] reduce rb_mutex_t size from 160 to 80 bytes on 64-bit
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2017/05/07
sorry for late response.
[#80996] [Ruby trunk Feature#13544] Allow loading an ISeqs sequence directly from a C extension without requiring buffer is in an RVALUE — sam.saffron@...
Issue #13544 has been reported by sam.saffron (Sam Saffron).
3 messages
2017/05/04
[#81016] [Ruby trunk Bug#13526] Segmentation fault at 0x0055c2e58e8920 ruby 2.3.1p112 (2016-04-26 revision 54768) [x86_64-linux] — s.wanabe@...
Issue #13526 has been updated by wanabe (_ wanabe).
3 messages
2017/05/07
[#81048] Re: [ruby-cvs:65788] normal:r58614 (trunk): rb_execution_context_t: move stack, stack_size and cfp from rb_thread_t — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
It causes compile error on raspi 3.
3 messages
2017/05/09
[#81201] Re: [ruby-cvs:65935] normal:r58761 (trunk): test/test_extilibs.rb: do not check the existence of fiddle — "U.NAKAMURA" <usa@...>
Hi, Eric
4 messages
2017/05/16
[#81202] Re: [ruby-cvs:65935] normal:r58761 (trunk): test/test_extilibs.rb: do not check the existence of fiddle
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/05/16
"U.NAKAMURA" <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
[#81427] Fwd: [ruby-changes:46809] normal:r58924 (trunk): test for IO.copy_stream CPU usage (r58534) — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
6 messages
2017/05/28
[#81428] Re: Fwd: [ruby-changes:46809] normal:r58924 (trunk): test for IO.copy_stream CPU usage (r58534)
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/05/28
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[ruby-core:81328] [Ruby trunk Feature#13568] File#path for O_TMPFILE fds are unmeaning
From:
nobu@...
Date:
2017-05-22 07:49:24 UTC
List:
ruby-core #81328
Issue #13568 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada).
shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) wrote:
> nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) wrote:
> > A correction; The method which `open` calls is `to_path`, not `path`.
> > These are different.
>
> Yes, I'm talking about `File#path`. Situations like [ruby-core:81167](#change-64819) is in my mind. `#to_path` is a separate issue.
`File#path` is not relevant to that situation at all.
`Digest.file` just opens the argument, and `open` calls `to_path` method on it to implicit conversion.
```sh
$ ruby -rdigest -e 'obj = Object.new; def obj.path;raise "path!"; end; Digest::MD5.file(obj)'
Traceback (most recent call last):
4: from -e:1:in `<main>'
3: from /opt/local/lib/ruby/2.5.0/digest.rb:35:in `file'
2: from /opt/local/lib/ruby/2.5.0/digest.rb:50:in `file'
1: from /opt/local/lib/ruby/2.5.0/digest.rb:50:in `open'
/opt/local/lib/ruby/2.5.0/digest.rb:50:in `initialize': no implicit conversion of Object into String (TypeError)
```
```sh
$ ruby -rdigest -e 'obj = Object.new; def obj.to_path;raise "to_path!"; end; Digest::MD5.file(obj)'
Traceback (most recent call last):
5: from -e:1:in `<main>'
4: from /opt/local/lib/ruby/2.5.0/digest.rb:35:in `file'
3: from /opt/local/lib/ruby/2.5.0/digest.rb:50:in `file'
2: from /opt/local/lib/ruby/2.5.0/digest.rb:50:in `open'
1: from /opt/local/lib/ruby/2.5.0/digest.rb:50:in `initialize'
-e:1:in `to_path': to_path! (RuntimeError)
```
> > > Do you think `nil` is better? I think nonexistent path is far more descriptive.
> >
> > The write mode problem is a matter.
> > It would silently (and wrongly) success to write.
>
> What about adding a slash then? like:
>
> ```
> irb(main):001:0> open("/tmp/#165106976 (deleted / nonexistent)", "w")
> Errno::ENOENT: No such file or directory @ rb_sysopen - /tmp/#165106976 (deleted / nonexistent)
> from (irb):1:in `initialize'
> from (irb):1:in `open'
> ```
A dedicated exception such as "Unnamed temporary file in some path" from `to_path` would be more descriptive and better, I think.
> > I think that `File#to_path` should raise if the path dost not exist, but untouch `File#path`.
>
> For `#to_path`, go to #13576. This issue is about `#path`, and I think adding description is the best known solution; leave it untouched does not save anything.
I think this issue is false assertion at the first.
----------------------------------------
Feature #13568: File#path for O_TMPFILE fds are unmeaning
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13568#change-65018
* Author: sorah (Sorah Fukumori)
* Status: Assigned
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: sorah (Sorah Fukumori)
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
By using File::TMPFILE (O_TMPFILE) allows us to create a file without directory entries.
While open(2) with O_TMPFILE don't create a file without directory entries, it still requires a directory name to determine a file system to create a file.
Current Ruby implementation holds such directory names in fptr->pathv and retrievable via File#path.
But such paths are useless and may raise errors. For example, some code [1] checks File#path availability then when available, it attempts to use the path to open a file in different fd, finally raises Errno::EISDIR.
This patch changes File#path (fptr->pathv) not to return String if a fd is opened with O_TMPFILE.
[1]: https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-ruby/blob/v2.9.17/aws-sdk-core/lib/aws-sdk-core/checksums.rb#L15
---Files--------------------------------
tmpfile-path.patch (1.96 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>