[#80974] [Ruby trunk Feature#13517] [PATCH] reduce rb_mutex_t size from 160 to 80 bytes on 64-bit — ko1@...
Issue #13517 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
4 messages
2017/05/02
[#81024] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13517] [PATCH] reduce rb_mutex_t size from 160 to 80 bytes on 64-bit
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2017/05/07
sorry for late response.
[#80996] [Ruby trunk Feature#13544] Allow loading an ISeqs sequence directly from a C extension without requiring buffer is in an RVALUE — sam.saffron@...
Issue #13544 has been reported by sam.saffron (Sam Saffron).
3 messages
2017/05/04
[#81016] [Ruby trunk Bug#13526] Segmentation fault at 0x0055c2e58e8920 ruby 2.3.1p112 (2016-04-26 revision 54768) [x86_64-linux] — s.wanabe@...
Issue #13526 has been updated by wanabe (_ wanabe).
3 messages
2017/05/07
[#81048] Re: [ruby-cvs:65788] normal:r58614 (trunk): rb_execution_context_t: move stack, stack_size and cfp from rb_thread_t — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
It causes compile error on raspi 3.
3 messages
2017/05/09
[#81201] Re: [ruby-cvs:65935] normal:r58761 (trunk): test/test_extilibs.rb: do not check the existence of fiddle — "U.NAKAMURA" <usa@...>
Hi, Eric
4 messages
2017/05/16
[#81202] Re: [ruby-cvs:65935] normal:r58761 (trunk): test/test_extilibs.rb: do not check the existence of fiddle
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/05/16
"U.NAKAMURA" <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
[#81427] Fwd: [ruby-changes:46809] normal:r58924 (trunk): test for IO.copy_stream CPU usage (r58534) — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
6 messages
2017/05/28
[#81428] Re: Fwd: [ruby-changes:46809] normal:r58924 (trunk): test for IO.copy_stream CPU usage (r58534)
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/05/28
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[ruby-core:81014] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13518] Indented multiline comments
From:
Matthew Kerwin <matthew@...>
Date:
2017-05-06 22:45:31 UTC
List:
ruby-core #81014
On 7 May 2017 at 08:13, <tscheingeld32@gmail.com> wrote: > Issue #13518 has been updated by tscheingeld (Terry Scheingeld). > > > duerst (Martin Dテシrst) wrote: > > `=begin`/`=end` are rare, and it's better to make them stick out. > > I would make the case that `=begin`/`=end` is rare because it can't be > indented. Multiline comments are very handy. It makes syntax highlighting > much cleaner for embedded content (in my case, documentation) if every line > doesn't have to start with a comment from the outer language. > > ---------------------------------------- > Feature #13518: Indented multiline comments > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13518#change-64677 > > * Author: tscheingeld (Terry Scheingeld) > * Status: Open > * Priority: Normal > * Assignee: > * Target version: > ---------------------------------------- > I'd like to submit the idea that multiline comments could be indented. > That is, `=begin` and `=end` do not have to start at column zero. That > would allow for more flexibility in documenting and commenting code. > 窶汽oes anybody write actual POD in their =begin/=end blocks? Personally, never use them to disable code because to my (Perl programmer's) eye they're strictly for documentation. And I don't use them for that because RDoc does it differently. Cheers -- Matthew Kerwin http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>