[#80531] Re: [ruby-cvs:65407] normal:r58236 (trunk): thread.c: comments on M:N threading [ci skip] — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
SASADA Koichi <ko1@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On 2017/04/02 11:35, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/08 9:33, Eric Wong wrote:
On 2017/05/08 10:53, SASADA Koichi wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/08 12:01, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/08 15:36, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/09 12:38, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/09 14:12, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/09 15:23, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Thank you.
[#80763] [Ruby trunk Feature#13434] better method definition in C API — naruse@...
Issue #13434 has been updated by naruse (Yui NARUSE).
[#80844] [Ruby trunk Bug#13503] Improve performance of some Time & Rational methods — watson1978@...
Issue #13503 has been updated by watson1978 (Shizuo Fujita).
[#80892] [Ruby trunk Misc#13514] [PATCH] thread_pthread.c (native_sleep): preserve old unblock function — ko1@...
Issue #13514 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
ko1@atdot.net wrote:
On 2017/04/27 8:58, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[ruby-core:80943] [Ruby trunk Feature#10095] Object#as
Issue #10095 has been updated by janosch-x (Janosch M端ller).
The weakness of "as" is that it is not a verb. This puts it at odds with the majority of core methods and makes it confusing when followed up by more method calls.
Without a follow-up it is indeed quite readable:
`number.as { |x| x ** 2 }`
Treat the number as it's square. Fair enough!
With more stuff chained, though, it becomes confusing, because a sentence like "Treat A as B" has a certain finality to it. In a natural language you would not say something like "Treat A as B as C". Thus a longer chain becomes hard to read:
`number.as { |x| x ** 2 }.next.as { |x| x ** 2 } # => 10201`
Using a verb instead makes it much easier to visualize the flow of events:
`number.convert { |x| x ** 2 }.next.convert { |x| x ** 2 }`
----------------------------------------
Feature #10095: Object#as
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10095#change-64601
* Author: matsuda (Akira Matsuda)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
We've had so many times of feature requests for a method similar to Object#tap that doesn't return self but returns the given block's execution result (e.g. #7388, #6684, #6721 ).
I'm talking about something like this in Ruby of course:
Object.class_eval { def as() yield(self) end }
IIRC Matz is not against introducing this feature but he didn't like any of the names proposed in the past, such as embed, do, identity, ergo, reference, yield_self, itself, apply, map, tap!, etc.
So, let us propose a new name, Object#as today.
It's named from the aspect of the feature that it gives the receiver a new name "as" a block local variable.
For instance, the code reads so natural and intuitive like this:
(1 + 2 + 3 + 4).as {|x| x ** 2}
=> 100
Array.new.as {|a| a << 1; a << 2}
=> [1, 2]
---Files--------------------------------
itself-block.patch (1.35 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>