[#80531] Re: [ruby-cvs:65407] normal:r58236 (trunk): thread.c: comments on M:N threading [ci skip] — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
SASADA Koichi <ko1@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On 2017/04/02 11:35, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/08 9:33, Eric Wong wrote:
On 2017/05/08 10:53, SASADA Koichi wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/08 12:01, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/08 15:36, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/09 12:38, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/09 14:12, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On 2017/05/09 15:23, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Thank you.
[#80763] [Ruby trunk Feature#13434] better method definition in C API — naruse@...
Issue #13434 has been updated by naruse (Yui NARUSE).
[#80844] [Ruby trunk Bug#13503] Improve performance of some Time & Rational methods — watson1978@...
Issue #13503 has been updated by watson1978 (Shizuo Fujita).
[#80892] [Ruby trunk Misc#13514] [PATCH] thread_pthread.c (native_sleep): preserve old unblock function — ko1@...
Issue #13514 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
ko1@atdot.net wrote:
On 2017/04/27 8:58, Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[ruby-core:80523] [Ruby trunk Bug#13358] OpenStruct overriding allocate
Issue #13358 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
Backport changed from 2.2: DONTNEED, 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: DONTNEED to 2.2: DONTNEED, 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: REQUIRED
I believe this should be backported to 2.4, this is notably the version the OP used.
----------------------------------------
Bug #13358: OpenStruct overriding allocate
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13358#change-64026
* Author: sitter (Harald Sitter)
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Eregon (Benoit Daloze)
* Target version:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.4.0p0 (2016-12-24 revision 57164) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.2: DONTNEED, 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: REQUIRED
----------------------------------------
In https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/15960b37e82ba60455c480b1c23e1567255d3e05 OpenStruct gained
~~~ruby
class << self # :nodoc:
alias allocate new
end
~~~
Which is rather severely conflicting with expected behavior as `Class.allocate` is meant to [not call initialize](http://ruby-doc.org/core-2.4.0/Class.html#method-i-allocate). So, in fact, the change made `allocate` of `OpenStruct` do what `allocate` is asserting not to do :-/
For `OpenStruct` itself that isn't that big a deal, for classes inheriting from `OpenStruct` it breaks `allocate` though.
Example:
~~~ruby
require 'ostruct'
class A < OpenStruct
def initialize(x, y = {})
super(y)
end
end
A.allocate
~~~
As `allocate` is alias'd to `new` in `OpenStruct` this will attempt to initialize `A` which will raise an `ArgumentError` because `A` cannot be initialized without arguments.
~~~
$ ruby x.rb
x.rb:4:in `initialize': wrong number of arguments (given 0, expected 1..2) (ArgumentError)
from x.rb:9:in `new'
from x.rb:9:in `<main>'
~~~
OpenStruct at the very least should document the fact that its allocate is behaving differently.
Ideally, `OpenStruct` should not alias allocate at all.
---Files--------------------------------
0001-ostruct.rb-improve-fix-for-OpenStruct.allocate-respo.patch (1.19 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>